TruView vs Zabbix comparison

Read 106 Zabbix reviews

25,708 Views
15,425 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

TruView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Zabbix and TruView are competing products in the network monitoring landscape. Zabbix seems to have the upper hand for those prioritizing cost efficiency and versatile data handling, whereas TruView stands out with its feature richness and advanced analytics, appealing to users despite its higher price point.

Features: Zabbix offers a strong open-source model, scalability for growing networks, and broad monitoring across various platforms. TruView provides detailed analytics, deep packet inspection, and comprehensive network visibility. The distinction lies in TruView’s focus on granule analytics compared to Zabbix’s generalized monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Zabbix could enhance its user interface and streamline setup for less technical users, while providing more advanced analytics features. TruView might benefit from more competitive pricing, improving initial deployment complexity, and offering a lighter version for smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zabbix features a flexible deployment process that may require technical resources given its open-source nature. TruView offers structured support and a streamlined setup, ideal for those needing less hands-on configuration. Additionally, TruView provides personalized customer service, balancing its initial deployment complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Zabbix’s open-source model leads to low setup costs with strong ROI, ideal for budget-conscious deployments. TruView, while more expensive initially, offers significant long-term ROI through its powerful analytical tools, justifying its cost for those valuing deep network intelligence.

To learn more, read our detailed TruView vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: July 2025).

Download the complete report

TruView vs. Zabbix

July 2025

Helped 861,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TruView

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

67th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zabbix

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

106

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (9th), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of TruView is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 12.7%, up from 11.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Zotex

Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Monitors traffic, analyzes flows, tracks packets, and measures bandwidth across our network

We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights.

Read full review

B Ahmed

Manager, Information Technology Zara & Inditex at Cenomi

Enables seamless global client monitoring with reliable remote connectivity

I use the solution to provide a perfect environment for remote connectivity with my clients. Many tools that I require for system maintenance are included. I can easily monitor all of my clients throughout the world I did not give much thought to it, however, improvements could be made to Zabbix.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use TruView primarily for network performance analysis and monitoring. It helps us track traffic, flows, packets, and bandwidth to understand our network's condition and detect any anomalies or attacks. However, the product's age limits its advanced features for performance analysis. The main advantage lies in its low cost and reliable functionality, as we have a permanent license and do not require support. Real-time monitoring in TruView is somewhat limited, as there is a delay of about five minutes in data updates, making it less effective for immediate insights."

"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."

"Like other common Linux distributions, some of the most valuable features of this solution are the ease of use and deployment. It's simple and has a lot of packages and a lot of software."

"The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration."

"Setup was straightforward. Initial deployment took two or three months."

"The overall functionality of Zabbix is very good. The monitoring of bank applications that Zabbix provides is great. The information is displayed on a dashboard that is easily viewed."

"We like the user-interface for this solution, which makes it an easy to use tool."

"The features I found most valuable are the user interface and a wide range of network devices that are easy to configure."

"We use it to monitor and manage our servers."

"It has an intuitive UI with beautiful graphs and customizable maps."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."

"We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service."

"To improve Zabbix, adding more features to support the monitoring of modern workloads like containers would be beneficial."

"The main problem with Zabbix is that you have to spend time writing templates for all of the products that you have."

"I would like for this solution to be more cloud-friendly."

"If Zabbix had a better dashboard then it would be nice."

"Sometimes, the documentation is a little bit written in Estonia – a country in Europe. The language barrier and translation to English can sometimes make it difficult to understand what they're trying to get at. It's just a language thing."

"I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes."

"The user interface could be better."

"Zabbix is powerful, but it is difficult to understand initially. There are many things that can be improved, but we might not be using Zabbix to its fullest extent. The software has more features than we need."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I was using the free, Community Edition."

"It's free software released under the GNU/GPL license."

"It is open source. If you want to have a subscription or official support, you can pay for it. They have different plans, which are not that expensive. The plans are based on per monitoring server, not per monitored equipment. So, it is not at all expensive, and you can also live without the support if you want a cheaper option."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."

"There is a license required for this solution and we pay annually for our license."

"Zabbix and Grafana are both open source products, we only needed to go to their website and download the application and we began to use them. The solutions are free."

"We were searching for an open source solution and Zabbix fit the bill because it is free and open source under the GPL license."

"The solution is free to use but they offer support as a paid service. If you can go read the manuals and do the fine-tuning based on your needs, you do not need to pay anything and you will have a full solution."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

19%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about TruView?

The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TruView?

There are certain licensing costs. For example, if you use NetFlow, you need to purchase a license depending on the size of your connector. Similarly, for voice monitoring, you need a separate lice...

What needs improvement with TruView?

We have faced delays in data retrieval and the lack of support due to the product being out of service.

What do you like most about Zabbix?

The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

We didn't use the commercial version. We used the free version.

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

I think it's the best solution for monitoring. I don't know any better.

Comparisons

No data available

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 10% of the time

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 10% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 7% of the time

NetXMS vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios XI vs Zabbix

Compared 3% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

Download TruView product report

TruView

June 2025

Download Zabbix product report

June 2025

Overview

Visual TruView by Fluke Networks is a unified solution for Application Aware Network Performance Management (AANPM). TruView embeds the most important data sources such as packet, transaction, NetFlow/IPFIX, and SNMP to present analytics in a time-correlated single dashboard view. These correlated views help you quickly see how well the infrastructure is transporting applications and how well those applications are performing in the context of end-user experience. And, TruView’s integrated 10 Gbps full line rate stream-to-disk packet capture ensures you’ll never miss an important event again.

NETSCOUT

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Sample Customers

FloraHolland, Miami-Dade Public Library System, Southeastern Freight Lines, Valdosta State University, Everett Clinic, Bioreference, Key Information Systems, ACER, Odeabank A.S.

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba