We performed a comparison between Tenable.io Container Security and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Tenable.io Container Security excels at analyzing vulnerabilities and identifying misconfiguration. Trend Micro Cloud One is praised for its extensive range of features, strong vulnerability protection, and real-time server security. Tenable.io could improve by automating remediation and CIS benchmarks while enhancing asset visibility and implementing customizable compliance options. Trend Micro Cloud One should focus on providing equal support for AWS and Azure and enhance its automation capabilities.
Service and Support: Some users encountered technical issues when contacting Tenable.io support. Trend Micro Cloud One was commended for its exceptional and easily accessible technical support. Users value the expertise and knowledge of the Trend Micro team.
Ease of Deployment: Tenable.io Container Security comes with clear setup documentation, making the deployment process smooth. Some found Trend Micro Cloud One easy to set up, while others found it complicated. It could pose challenges for individuals without a background in IT or information security. The deployment time varied depending on the complexity of the system.
Pricing: Tenable.io Container Security's setup cost is determined by the application's page count. The view of Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is generally positive, though some noted that customers must pay extra for additional services.
ROI: Tenable.io Container Security users have provided no feedback on ROI so far. Trend Micro Cloud One offers a versatile return on investment and smooth integration without any reported issues.
Comparison Results: Trend Micro Cloud One is the preferred choice over Tenable.io Container Security. Users like its comprehensive features, strong vulnerability protection, and real-time server security. The solution is more cost-effective than most, and Trend Micro's support team received high praise, with users valuing their knowledge and expertise.
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, it is a good solution."
"Currently, I haven't implemented the solution due to its deprecation by the site. However, I can highlight some benefits of Tenable Cloud Security, a cybersecurity solution with various features for scanning vulnerabilities in both cloud environments and on-premises container security."
"It helps us secure our applications from the build phase and identify the weaknesses from scratch."
"The strong security provided by the product in the container environment is its most valuable feature."
"The tool's most valuable feature is scanning, reporting, and troubleshooting."
"Nessus scanner is very effective for internal penetration testing."
"Tenable.io detects misconfiguration when you deploy a Docker or Kubernetes container. It's much better to remedy these issues during deployment instead of waiting until the container is already in the production environment."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"The security is good."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"I like the conformity and workload security modules. Workload security is all about intrusion detection and prevention. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has behavioral rules that are auto-populated based on organizational structure. That's one aspect that we liked most."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"The initial setup is highly complex."
"They need to work on auto-remediation so it's easier for the security team to act quickly when certain assets or resources are deployed. The latest version has a CIS benchmark that you need to meet for containers in the cloud, but more automation is needed."
"I feel that in certain areas this product has false positives which the company should work on. They should also try to include business logic vulnerabilities in the scanner testing. Finally, the vulnerability assessment feature should be increased to other hardware devices, apart from firewalls."
"Tenable.io Container Security should improve integration modules. It should also improve stability."
"I believe integration plays a crucial role for Tenable, particularly in terms of connecting with other products and various container solutions like Docker or Kubernetes. It seems that in future updates, enhanced integration is something I would appreciate. Currently, there is integration with Docker, but when it comes to Kubernetes or other container solutions, it appears to be a challenge, especially with on-prem scanners."
"The stability and setup phase of the product are areas with shortcomings where improvements are needed."
"The support is tricky to reach, so we would like better-oriented technical support enabled."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"The pricing can get high."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"The product could use a little bit of automation."
"The licensing model could be improved. To gain full coverage, you need to spend more to buy subscriptions for each kind of service they offer. It will start to be pricey if you want full coverage."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
More Tenable.io Container Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tenable.io Container Security is ranked 22nd in Container Security with 7 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 7th in Container Security with 17 reviews. Tenable.io Container Security is rated 7.8, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Tenable.io Container Security writes "It helps you catch misconfigurations before they go into a production environment where they're harder to deal with". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Tenable.io Container Security is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Wiz, Trivy and Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Orca Security. See our Tenable.io Container Security vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
