Symantec Cloud Workload Protection vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] comparison

Broadcom and F5 are both solutions in the Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) category. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of F5 users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform EOL and Symantec Cloud Workload Protection compete in the cloud security solutions category. Symantec Cloud Workload Protection stands out due to its comprehensive features and scalability, making it a more complete solution, while Threat Stack has the advantage in pricing and customer support feedback.

Features: Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform EOL provides real-time threat detection, visibility across cloud environments, and comprehensive reporting capabilities. Symantec Cloud Workload Protection offers automated threat remediation, seamless integration, and enhanced compliance support. Symantec's focus on automation and compliance positions it as a more complete solution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is noted for its streamlined deployment process and responsive customer service. Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform EOL offers a quick deployment process but may not provide the same integration and support level as Symantec. Symantec's efficient deployment and superior customer service make it more accessible for organizations needing quick support.

Pricing and ROI: Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform EOL is appealing for budget-conscious buyers due to its lower setup costs and positive feedback on initial pricing. Symantec Cloud Workload Protection requires a higher initial investment but offers enhanced ROI through its comprehensive features. While Threat Stack is advantageous for upfront budgeting, Symantec justifies its cost with long-term benefits and robust features, positioning it as a strategic investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 892,868 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Featured Reviews

Sreeraj Mohandas

Security Engineer at HashXpert

Consolidated cloud security has reduced manual work and has automated vulnerability remediation

I elaborate on my rating of SentinelOne support by mentioning that there was some time where the troubleshooting took a longer time. In fact, there were many meetings going on. The availability of the document on the internet is on a lesser side because as an engineer, I would want to know about the troubleshooting aspects of this particular tool. When I am facing a customer, I do not prefer to bring the vendor to every call and try to resolve it, as it takes months and months. It would be better to have a training session with the engineer on site to explain and train properly. This is not the case with SentinelOne, so this is the only thing I have a complaint about. I do not have any other room for improvement to suggest within SentinelOne itself. However, I would really want the AI assistant for the threat hunting part to be more accessible. They have it, but they are making it licensed, so it is a bit on the higher end.

Read full review

Mahadi Ma

Engineer at M.Tech

Has a good active directory feature and good technical support

One area for improvement in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is integration. Other features that could be improved are defense control and encryption, particularly in the USB. For example, users should be able to control the USB and have the capability of blocking and allowing USB reading and writing. Having a USB encryption feature in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection would also be very useful. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is more advanced defense on mobile devices such as iOS and Android. For example, even offline or with no internet connection, it would be good if the solution could defend devices against malware and ransomware.

Read full review

Skyler Cain

Software Development Manager at Rent Dynamics

SecOps program for us, as a smaller company, is amazing; they know what to look for

They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter. Even as part of the SecOps Program, that could be helpful; a quick analysis. They're analyzing our whole infrastructure and saying, "You have one VPC and that doesn't make a lot of sense, that should be multiple VPCs and here's why." The architecture of the servers in whatever cloud-hosting provider you're on could be helpful. Other than that, they should continue to expand on their notifications and on what's a vulnerability. They do a great job of that and we want them to continue to do that. It would be cool, since the agent is already deployed and they know about the server, they know the IP address, and they know what vulnerability is there, for them to test the vulnerability and see if they can actually exploit it. Or, once we patch it, they could double-check that it can't be. I don't know how hard that would be to build. Thinking on it off the top off my head, it could be a little challenging but it could also be highly interesting. It would also be great if we could test a couple of other features like hammering a server with 100 login attempts and see what happens. Real test scenarios could be really helpful. That is probably more something close to what they do with the SOC 2 audit or the report. But more visualization of that, being able to test things out on our infrastructure to make sure we can or can't hit this box could be interesting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very straightforward. It is not complicated. For the information that it provides, it does a pretty good job."

"With SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security, I appreciate the monitoring features and the report with the compliance score."

"The cooperative nature of SentinelOne has influenced our decision not to shift."

"I would rate this solution a nine out of ten."

"SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has improved our security posture."

"Singularity Cloud's ability to create custom correlation searches and reduce noise is highly valuable."

"It integrates very well. We sell different products from different vendors. We know that the SentinelOne Singularity platform can be integrated with several different solutions from different vendors."

"The remediation process is good."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pros

"This is a very good tool for cloud protection."

"The most valuable features in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection are endpoint protection and active directory features. The active directory features in the product are very good, and in terms of security, the most valuable feature in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is threat defense or threat protection."

"It will read various logs, diagnose what is wrong, and then alert you."

"Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is a stable solution and it offers very good protection for organizations."

"The most valuable feature is the SecOps because they have our back and they help us with the reports... It's like having an extension of your team. And then, it grows with you."

"The rules are really great. They give us more visibility and control over what's being triggered. There's a large set of rules that come out-of-the-box. We can customize them and we can create our own rules based on the traffic patterns that we see."

"We find the licensing and pricing very easy to understand and a good value for the services provided."

"Technical support is very helpful."

"We like the ability of the host security module to monitor the processes running on our servers to help us monitor activity."

"There has been a measurable decrease in the meantime to remediation... because we have so many different tech verticals already collated in one place, our ability to respond is drastically different than it used to be."

"It is scalable. It deploys easily with curl and yum."

"We're using it on container to see when activity involving executables happens, and that's great."

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] pros

Cons

"The areas with room for improvement include the cost, which is higher compared to other security platforms. The dashboard can also be laggy."

"A two-month grace period for extended searches would be a valuable improvement."

"I export CSV. I cannot export graphs. Restricting it to the CSV format has its own disadvantages. These are all machine IP addresses and information. I cannot change it to the JSON format. The export functionality can be improved."

"One area that could be improved in SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is their policies; the way they have configured the policies could be enhanced."

"We can customize security policies but lack auditing capabilities."

"Their search feature could be better."

"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."

"The documentation that I use for the initial setup can be more detailed or written in a more user-friendly language to avoid troubles."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security cons

"One area for improvement in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is integration."

"One area for improvement in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is integration. Other features that could be improved are defense control and encryption, particularly in the USB. For example, users should be able to control the USB and have the capability of blocking and allowing USB reading and writing. Having a USB encryption feature in Symantec Cloud Workload Protection would also be very useful."

"In the future, we may need to use features that are only available in one of the competing products."

"The solution’s ability to consume alerts and data in third-party tools (via APIs and export into S3 buckets) is moderate. They have some work to do in that area... The API does not mimic the features of the UI as far as reporting and pulling data out go. There's a big discrepancy there."

"I would like further support of Windows endpoint agents or the introduction of support for Windows endpoint agents."

"It's too expensive, but I'm always going to say that. It is very expensive compared to some other products."

"The reports aren't very good. We've automated the report generation via the API and replaced almost all the reports that they generate for us using API calls instead."

"The one thing that we know they're working on, but we don't have through the tool, is the application layer. As we move to a serverless environment, with AWS Fargate or direct Lambda, that's where Threat Stack does not have the capacity to provide feed. Those are areas that it's blind to now..."

"The API - which has grown quite a bit, so we're still learning it and I can't say whether it still needs improvement - was an area that had been needing it."

"They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective."

"The compliance and governance need improvement."

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing was a little less than other providers."

"The tool is cost-effective."

"The pricing for PingSafe in India was more reasonable than other competitors."

"PingSafe falls somewhere in the middle price range, neither particularly cheap nor expensive."

"It is cost-effective compared to other solutions in the market."

"As a partner, we receive a discount on the licenses."

"I would rate the cost a seven out of ten with ten being the most costly."

"I understand that SentinelOne is a market leader, but the bill we received was astronomical."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pricing and cost advice

"The licensing cost for Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is paid yearly."

"What we're paying now is somewhere around $15 to $20 per agent per month, if I recall correctly. The other cost we have is SecOps."

"Pricing seems to be in line with the market structure. It's fine."

"It came in cheaper than Trend Micro when we purchased it a few years ago."

"I'm happy with the amount that we spend for the product that we get and the overall service that we get. It's not cheap, but I'm still happy with the spend."

"It is a cost-effective choice versus other solutions on the market."

"It is very expensive compared to some other products. The pricing is definitely high."

"We find the licensing and pricing very easy to understand and a good value for the services provided."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	52
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	58

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?

The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is that the pric...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingSafe?

Integration could be improved because not all solutions can be integrated with SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Wiz vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 8% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

FortiCNAPP vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 4% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Competitors

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Symantec Cloud Workload Protection

Compared 46% of the time

Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs Symantec Cloud Workload Protection

Compared 21% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs Symantec Cloud Workload Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Symantec Cloud Workload Protection

Compared 12% of the time

Tenable Cloud Security vs Symantec Cloud Workload Protection

Compared 8% of the time

More Symantec Cloud Workload Protection Competitors

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Snyk vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

FortiCNAPP vs Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

More Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

April 2026

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report

Download SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

May 2026

Symantec Cloud Workload Protection report

Download Symantec Cloud Workload Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL]

April 2026

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] report

Download Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] product report

Also Known As

PingSafe

No data available

Threat Stack, CSP,

Overview

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers a streamlined approach to cloud security with intuitive operation and strong integration capabilities for heightened threat detection and remediation efficiency.

Singularity Cloud Security stands out for its real-time detection and response, effectively minimizing detection and remediation timelines. Its automated remediation integrates smoothly with third-party tools enhancing operational efficiency. The comprehensive console ensures visibility and support for forensic investigations. Seamless platform integration and robust support for innovation are notable advantages. Areas for development include improved search functionality, affordability, better firewall capabilities for remote users, stable agents, comprehensive reporting, and efficient third-party integrations. Clarity in the interface, responsive support, and real-time alerting need enhancement, with a call for more automation and customization. Better scalability and cost-effective integration without compromising capabilities are desired.

What are SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security's standout features?

Ease of Use: Intuitive operation simplifies navigation across platforms.
Real-Time Detection: Quick identification and response to threats.
Automated Remediation: Streamlines recovery processes with integration capabilities.
Forensic Visibility: Aids in thorough threat analysis and prevention strategies.
Comprehensive Console: Offers full visibility and historical data tracking.
Platform Integration: Supports seamless operation across cloud and hybrid environments.

What benefits should users expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automation and third-party integration improve threat response.
Improved Detection: Reduces mean time to detect and respond to threats.
Operational Support: Comprehensive visibility and forensic tools aid operational decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Affordable integration with scaling capabilities without high overhead.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is deployed in industries needing robust cloud security posture management, endpoint protection, and threat hunting. Utilized frequently across AWS and Azure, it assists in monitoring, threat detection, and maintaining compliance in diverse environments while providing real-time alerts and recommendations for proactive threat management.

SentinelOne

Symantec Cloud Workload Protection offers a robust security solution designed for safeguarding workloads in cloud environments, providing users with comprehensive threat protection and adaptability across diverse platforms.

As cloud deployments grow, Symantec Cloud Workload Protection provides end-to-end visibility and control over workloads, ensuring strong security. It specializes in securing complex and dynamic cloud infrastructures. By leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities, it mitigates risks effectively, facilitates compliance, and automates security processes. Its adaptability to multi-cloud environments and continuous monitoring make it an essential tool for businesses focusing on cloud security.

What are the key features?

Comprehensive Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats efficiently using real-time analytics.
Automated Security Responses: Enables automated remediation to minimize response times.
Multi-Cloud Support: Provides seamless integration across leading cloud platforms.
Compliance Management: Assists in adhering to industry standards for cloud security.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Security Posture: Reduces risk exposure by addressing threats quickly.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers overall security costs through automation and streamlined processes.
Improved Compliance: Helps achieve and maintain necessary compliance standards.
Scalability: Adapts to evolving cloud environments without significant overhead.

In industries like finance and healthcare, where data security is critical, Symantec Cloud Workload Protection is implemented to bolster defenses against potential breaches and ensure compliance with strict regulations. Its capability to integrate seamlessly into existing infrastructures makes it an attractive option for industries aiming to safeguard sensitive data effectively.

Broadcom

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] offers robust security features including endpoint monitoring, rule customization, and integration capabilities, with easy connectivity to cloud services like Docker and AWS.

Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] provides tools for enhancing security visibility across cloud infrastructure. It supports AWS and Docker integration, facilitating efficient threat detection and management. Users appreciate its capability to configure customizable alerts and monitor endpoints, sessions, API interactions, and cloud services. However, there are areas needing improvement, such as better serverless environment support and reduced alert frequency. The platform services smaller organizations by compensating for limited security resources with its comprehensive monitoring and auditing tools.

What are the key features?

Easy Cloud Service Integration: Streamlined connectivity with Docker and AWS for efficient monitoring.
Customizable Rule Sets: Tailor security rules to meet specific organizational needs.
Email Alerts: Receive timely notifications about security events and threats.
Interactive Session Monitoring: Track live sessions for suspicious activities.
API Integration: Connect effortlessly with third-party tools for an enhanced security posture.
SecOps Support: Assistance for organizations lacking dedicated security teams.

What are the benefits and ROI features?

Streamlined Threat Detection: Effective process monitoring to identify potential threats.
Cost Efficiency: Serves companies with limited resources by providing essential security functions.
Comprehensive Audits: Helps in regular examinations of cloud infrastructure, enhancing compliance.
Visibility into Cloud Operations: Offers a detailed dashboard for threat visibility and monthly vulnerability assessments.

In specific industries, Threat Stack Cloud Security Platform [EOL] is utilized for its strength in monitoring cloud infrastructure and preventing unauthorized access. Organizations in fields where cloud operations are critical use it for regular audits and monitoring. Its capabilities in threat management are leveraged to maintain secure operations and compliance, especially where there is no dedicated security team.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

LifeLock

StatusPage.io, Walkbase, Spanning, DNAnexus, Jobcase, Nextcapital, Smartling, Veracode, 6sense

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wiz, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP). Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

892,868 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.