Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Splunk SOAR vs The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Splunk SOAR
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (3rd)
The Nagomi Proactive Defens...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (25th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Splunk SOAR is designed for Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) and holds a mindshare of 7.6%, down 7.7% compared to last year.
The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM), holds 0.2% mindshare.
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Splunk SOAR7.6%
Microsoft Sentinel15.0%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR9.7%
Other67.7%
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform0.2%
XM Cyber15.4%
Cymulate14.8%
Other69.6%
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Hamada Elewa - PeerSpot reviewer
Creating automation workflows has reduced detection time but integration and visibility challenges remain
The visibility of Splunk SOAR's playbook viewer is rather unclear to me; I wonder what the visibility is for. There are indeed some problems with integrating Splunk SOAR with other Splunk products or other vendors in my system, and it took a while after implementing Splunk SOAR to train my SOC team on how to use the playbooks. Splunk SOAR does not help me reduce my security event volume; in fact, it makes them massive. Splunk SOAR does not help me free up resources to work on other projects; they are not good in this regard. I have not seen time to value with Splunk SOAR; I am curious about what time to value means. I believe Splunk SOAR can be improved by adding more integrations and out-of-the-box integrations, and by increasing the number of admins that can access the solution simultaneously. I see the need to inject more AI in creating the playbooks. I think they can inject more threat intelligence into the solution.
Use The Nagomi Proactive Defense Platform?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise30
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Splunk Phantom?
Splunk SOAR's quick response to incidents is the most valuable part.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Phantom?
I don't have experience with costs; management handles that aspect.
What needs improvement with Splunk Phantom?
I'm not an expert on Splunk SOAR, but I'm sure our team members know what areas could be improved. I haven't spoken to them specifically about what could be improved or what they would want Splunk ...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Phantom
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Recorded Future, Blackstone
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: October 2025.
872,869 professionals have used our research since 2012.