SAP S4HANA on AWS vs Virtustream xStream comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Virtustream are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while Virtustream is ranked #25. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.9% mindshare in ISI, compared to Virtustream’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Virtustream users who would recommend it.

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Read 41 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews

2,356 Views
1,956 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Virtustream xStream

Read 1 Virtustream xStream review

185 Views
110 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Virtustream xStream

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAP S4HANA on AWS and Virtustream xStream based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS).

To learn more, read our detailed Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Virtustream xStream

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

25th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 3.9%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Virtustream xStream is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

AtifNajam

Group CIO at Ghulam Faruque Group

Strong integration in manufacturing and enhances flexibility with useful workflow management

Installation is very straightforward, however, implementation takes years or months based on the project's size. In manufacturing, the requirement might go from ten to 12 people. If I'm a sales-oriented company, such as an FMCG or something else, then I might need around seven or eight people at the very minimum. It is not an easy task to migrate. If I'm moving from a different ERP to S/4HANA, I need a proper project that probably spans several months, with significant engagement from both the business side and the technical side. I need an opportunity partner on it. Processing to SCE S/4HANA takes a bit of effort.

Read full review

RONNIE HENRY

Business Systems Manager at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

Improves efficiencies, has encryption, and great mission-critical customer support

Previously we had an amateur solution where we were managing on our own data center but we had the management in-house. It was a strategic move to give people who were more competent and with business focus other core initiatives. It was a strategic outsource model. The equipment we were using was out date and at the end of its life cycle, we had to make some transitions, do a hardware replacement, or move on. We moved on to this solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to use and user-friendly."

"SAP has an auto-scaling feature, but Azure doesn't."

"We have approximately 1,000 people using the solution in my organization. The solution is scalable."

"The support is top-notch."

"The most valuable feature of SAP S4HANA on AWS is that when developed on a new structured system it can be configured."

"The internal integration within departments and integration with third parties is simplified in the system."

"This product is currently the leading product within this category."

"After the implementation phase of the product, it becomes a very stable tool."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pros

"The solution has encryption which we did not have before."

Cons

"Currently, we have some integration areas like Concur and Ariba that could be improved. Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers."

"I would like to see a lower price for the solution."

"SAP S4HANA on AWS could improve by having the entire solution available as a web solution. They only have Fiori right now, and it's a solution for certain modules, but not for all the modules that SAP currently has. We would like to see the GUI removed, it is not very good. We want it to be web-based."

"SAP S4HANA on AWS could improve by having more data centers because there are limited data centers in the region I am in. Amazon AWS has announced a few more data centers to be added, but they're still not 100 percent operational for SAP solutions."

"Over the last three to four years, I haven't encountered significant issues with SAP S/4HANA. While occasional system bugs are normal in software, the overall experience has been positive. As a business partner, it stands out as a reliable ERP solution."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"The AI aspect of SAP S4HANA can be improved."

"This solution is very resource-intensive, including high memory and CPU utilization."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS cons

"Our account representative was inexperienced, they could improve on how they are managing accounts."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing fees are on an annual basis."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"The pricing is a little bit high."

"I would rate the pricing as a two and a half out of five."

"It's expensive. It would be good if AWS and Azure could reduce the computing cost for people who move to the public cloud."

"Compared to its competitors, SAP S4HANA on AWS is a costly solution."

"The licensing of the product is reasonable but the cost of the hardware is exorbitant."

"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the highest price, I rate the solution's pricing an eight."

More SAP S4HANA on AWS pricing and cost advice

"The solution is a bit expensive, we are still negotiating the price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?

With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?

The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?

Currently, we have some integration areas like Concur and Ariba that could be improved. Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 68% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 8% of the time

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP S4HANA on AWS

May 2025

Download SAP S4HANA on AWS product report

Buyer's Guide

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

June 2025

Download Virtustream xStream product report

Also Known As

SAP S/4HANA on AWS

No data available

Overview

SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Virtustream's xStream Management Platform provides a unified, cloudagnostic control plane that integrates infrastructure orchestration, enterprise application automation and a suite of business intelligence and service management tools.

Virtustream

Sample Customers

Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland

Continental, Domino Foods, Florida Crystals, Intel, Lanx, UOL Group

Buyer's Guide

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS). Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.