Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

Microsoft and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0. Microsoft holds a 16.6% mindshare in ISI, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Azure
Read 316 Microsoft Azure reviews
  • 20,523 Views
  • 10,877 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
SAP S4HANA on AWS
Read 41 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews
  • 2,060 Views
  • 2,039 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Microsoft Azure and SAP S4HANA on AWS compete in the cloud services category. Azure holds an advantage with extensive hybrid capabilities and support for various platforms, contrasting SAP S4HANA’s strength in ERP solutions and real-time analytics.

Features: Azure provides extensive hybrid cloud capabilities, support for a variety of development frameworks, and multiple data center locations. It also offers adaptability for both Microsoft and non-Microsoft platforms. Meanwhile, SAP S4HANA's key features include powerful integration capabilities, the ability to provide real-time analytics, and a robust database technology that helps streamline complex processes.

Room for Improvement: Azure users face issues with complex subscription models, challenging user interfaces, and technical support difficulties, along with a need for improved integration capabilities. SAP S4HANA on AWS needs to address high licensing costs, intricate implementation processes, and user interface design gaps, alongside enhancing third-party application integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure offers flexibility with hybrid and public cloud deployments but experiences mixed feedback regarding customer service. SAP S4HANA on AWS focuses on public cloud deployment, known for good customer service despite deployment complexities. Both struggle with certain aspects of technical support.

Pricing and ROI: Azure's competitive pricing and pay-as-you-go model provide flexibility, yet issues with cost predictability exist. SAP S4HANA on AWS, perceived as expensive, justifies its costs with robust features and potential ROI through streamlined operations. Both solutions provide long-term value, requiring cost management for optimized ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Microsoft Azure saves costs and boosts efficiency with scalable cloud services, pay-as-you-go pricing, and reduced maintenance expenses.
Sentiment score
7.4
SAP S4HANA on AWS boosts performance, efficiency, and ROI, with payback in months and long-term financial benefits.
The value for money is good, and Microsoft Azure has positively impacted our operational costs.
When we use Microsoft Azure, it provides enhanced security from our perspective, though I am not certain about the financial return on investment or benefits for our users as I do not have that information.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
On a very good implementation, usually, if the scale of the business is large, the implementation can give a payback within six, seven, or eight months of implementation.
Although our investment was higher compared to the previous ERP system, we are able to derive ROI from SAP S4HANA on AWS.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report
HM
FP
AtifNajam - PeerSpot reviewerSrinivasVadde - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.5
Customer service is mixed; paid support is praised for responsiveness, while free options may face delays and complexity.
Sentiment score
6.5
SAP S4HANA on AWS support receives mixed reviews; AWS prompt, SAP varies, necessitating improvement and expertise due to complexity.
Regarding technical support from Microsoft, I find they are responsive and helpful, depending on which support package you're on.
The support from Microsoft Azure is good.
I rate technical support as excellent because we have not experienced many problems when calling for assistance.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
We received the right support during our implementation and continue to benefit from it.
They have a support model available, with first-level support handling initial issues when I integrate the system.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report
JE
HM
FP
SrinivasVadde - PeerSpot reviewerAtifNajam - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Azure excels in scalability and flexibility, supporting various workloads, though cost and limitations may concern some users.
Sentiment score
7.8
SAP S4HANA on AWS provides scalable support for large enterprises, integrates well, but requires technical expertise for efficient scaling.
The scalability of Microsoft Azure is excellent for growth and adaptation, depending on company requirements.
Microsoft Azure is not just one product; it is a platform with multiple products within Microsoft Azure, and I would say it is scalable and would rate it a nine.
Scalability with Microsoft Azure is amazing, which is a primary reason for using cloud solutions.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
AWS has been running probably 96% of Fortune 500 companies across the globe, so scalability is not an issue.
The product is versatile and can manage complexity beyond expectations.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report
FP
JE
KP
AtifNajam - PeerSpot reviewer
KK
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Microsoft Azure is highly reliable and scalable, despite occasional outages; users confidently rate it high for stability and performance.
Sentiment score
7.8
SAP S4HANA on AWS is praised for stability and reliability, though performance can vary with specific setups and configurations.
Microsoft Azure is quite stable, but recent outages and security issues have slightly decreased my confidence.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
As a finance controller, we have seen improvements in finance deliverables, SLAs in payables, and reconciliation timelines.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Azure needs pricing transparency, intuitive interface, improved support, better technical features, and refined management tools for users.
SAP S4HANA on AWS needs better integration, cost efficiency, user-friendly interfaces, improved support, scalability, and enhanced deployment resources.
There is still room for improvement in terms of pricing.
The administrative side is suitable for technical people, but our finance and HR super users find it less user-friendly, as they prefer drag-and-drop features to build their own solutions without contacting IT.
We cannot progress without artificial intelligence because technology is moving in that direction, and we should adapt to be in line with those developments.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.
SAP introduced flexible workflows, which are even better if I want customized workflows for my documentation within the procurement domain.
The interface and interaction with the technical team require intensive training.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report
JE
HM
FP
SrinivasVadde - PeerSpot reviewerAtifNajam - PeerSpot reviewer
KK
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Azure offers flexible, competitive pricing, yet complexity makes AWS and GCP potentially more cost-effective for enterprises.
SAP S4HANA on AWS is costly but offers value with flexibility, significant enterprise investment, and potential discounts.
Microsoft solutions might be cheaper than some services like AWS, but some solutions may be more expensive depending on the services compared.
Copilot is expensive based on recent pricing for our POC.
Regarding the pricing for Microsoft Azure services, I would rate our satisfaction as very good.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.
SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report
KP
HM
FP
SrinivasVadde - PeerSpot reviewer
KK
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Azure offers flexibility, scalability, global presence, integration, security, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness for enhanced organizational infrastructure.
SAP S4HANA on AWS offers a user-friendly interface, real-time processing, scalability, AI integration, and cost-effective, high-availability hosting.
Power BI, another feature of Azure, is extremely elegant and has robust features that support forecasting using R and Python.
Data integrations are particularly effective on Microsoft Azure, especially with our banner services that we automate through Power Automate.
The scalability of Microsoft Azure is very good for growing and adapting to company requirements.
For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Azure report
The costing and personnel planning integration are among the strongest areas of this solution.
From the finance side, we have enhanced our internal controls and reduced the timeline for closing the month from a year to just two days.
The configurations are quite comprehensive, and the product can handle many complex scenarios.
For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report
KP
HM
FP
AtifNajam - PeerSpot reviewerSrinivasVadde - PeerSpot reviewer
KK
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
316
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (1st)
SAP S4HANA on AWS
Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
7th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 16.6%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 3.5%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Nicolas Chabrier - PeerSpot reviewer
Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration
The only thing is regarding the management of multi-cloud environments. That's not really possible. So basically, it's wonderful if you manage Microsoft clearly and if you manage Microsoft Azure, but if you need to consume external services and have a global overview of all your consumption, it's not the case. Google, for instance, has tools that help you manage multiple environments, which makes sense because Google is really the cloud provider. So that's why they need to be compliant with the others. But for sure, Microsoft's approach is different, and it's wonderful when you're one hundred percent on Azure. But if you'd like to have something more of a multi-cloud strategy, that's a bit of a gap where they could improve.
Read full review
AtifNajam - PeerSpot reviewer
Strong integration in manufacturing and enhances flexibility with useful workflow management
Installation is very straightforward, however, implementation takes years or months based on the project's size. In manufacturing, the requirement might go from ten to 12 people. If I'm a sales-oriented company, such as an FMCG or something else, then I might need around seven or eight people at the very minimum. It is not an easy task to migrate. If I'm moving from a different ERP to S/4HANA, I need a proper project that probably spans several months, with significant engagement from both the business side and the technical side. I need an opportunity partner on it. Processing to SCE S/4HANA takes a bit of effort.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 14, 2013
Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
Read full review
 

Answers from the Community

JR
Nov 7, 2021
Nov 7, 2021
Looking for a comparison chart between SAP S4 HANA on AWS and Microsoft Azure
SAP S/4HANA is a system for managing relational databases. The in-memory system, as well as the columnar structure, results in retrieving the data with better performance than RDBMS systems. You can deploy it in AWS or in Azure. Here is a brief comparison: Azure dedicates specific virtual machines and bare metal servers to run SAP HANA. SAP HANA applications run on an SAP application. With Azur...
See 2 answers
EB
Aug 26, 2021
Hello @Md Saiful Hyder , @MangeshDixit , @JeffreyVergara , @SaleemKhokhar, @HimanshuTejwani, @SathishKumar and@Enrico Boseli. Do you have any inputs/advice for @Julie Roy?  Thanks in advance!
Read full answer
LF
Nov 7, 2021
SAP S/4HANA is a system for managing relational databases. The in-memory system, as well as the columnar structure, results in retrieving the data with better performance than RDBMS systems. You can deploy it in AWS or in Azure. Here is a brief comparison: Azure dedicates specific virtual machines and bare metal servers to run SAP HANA. SAP HANA applications run on an SAP application. With Azure, you have an entire SAP application (VM) layer that includes servers, storage, and network configuration. You can deploy resources from 36 Intel with memory of 768GB to 480 Intel processors with 24TB of memory. Finally, you can combine AP and non SAP data. You can apply advanced data services, such as analytics and AI. Aws Azure Supported use cases Production, non-production Production, non-production Supported resources Up to 48TB of memory Up to 12TB Licensing Pay per use BYOL subscription Services Single and multi-node architecture. Load balancing, instance provisioning. Load balancing, clustering, Active Directory, and the HANA database. SAP S/4HANA on AWS provides infrastructure services. AWS has the advantage of making SAP HANA available, cost-effective, and fault-tolerant. With AWS you can configure a single EC2 to host SAP HANA with EBS storage and your chosen operating system. Another option is to use multi-AZ to deploy primary and secondary nodes, using one for production and another for non-production. You have two main options: First, BYOL (Bring your own license). It supports native HANA applications, S/4HANA, Business Suite on HANA, and you can have OLAP memory up to 100 TB. Second, the express edition, which is free to use for in-memory databases, but keep in mind you’ll have to stay under 32 GB. Conclusions Which is best will depend on your use cases. Azure in my opinion offers better performance for big data and AI workloads. AWS provides more reliability and redundancy.
Read full answer
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Educational Organization
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?
IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...
See all answers
Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?
One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...
See all answers
How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?
I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...
See all answers
What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?
With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?
The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?
Currently, we have some integration areas like Concur and Ariba that could be improved. Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 12% of the time
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 9% of the time
Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 9% of the time
Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Red Hat OpenShift vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 9% of the time
Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure Logo
Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure
Compared 6% of the time
More Microsoft Azure Competitors
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS
Compared 12% of the time
Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS Logo
Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS
Compared 8% of the time
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS Logo
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS
Compared 7% of the time
Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS Logo
Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS
Compared 7% of the time
Alibaba Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS Logo
Alibaba Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS
Compared 2% of the time
More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure
August 2025
Microsoft Azure reportDownload Microsoft Azure product report
Buyer's Guide
SAP S4HANA on AWS
July 2025
SAP S4HANA on AWS reportDownload SAP S4HANA on AWS product report
 

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure
SAP S/4HANA on AWS
 

Overview

Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.

Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.

What are Azure's key features?
  • Integrated Services: Ensures compatibility with Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments.
  • Scalability: Supports growing business demands with flexible computing power.
  • Security: Offers robust cloud-based security features for data protection.
  • Cost Efficiency: Provides options that optimize costs for diverse requirements.
  • Application Deployment: Facilitates quick rollout of apps and services.
What benefits should users expect from Azure?
  • Operational Optimization: Allows companies to streamline processes effectively.
  • Innovative Efficiency: Empowers businesses to innovate with powerful tools.
  • Reliable Support: Backed by strong technical support and comprehensive documentation.
  • Flexible Cloud Solutions: Offers a range of options for cloud migrations and infrastructure management.

Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.

Microsoft

SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

  • Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
  • Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
  • Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
  • Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
 

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.
Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS
July 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Azure vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.