We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature for us is the different types of reporting it provides."
"Rapid7 InsightVM has given us a practical view of the vulnerabilities present in our organization."
"One of the most valuable features is it's graphical dashboard feature. It is quite easy to manage the widgets, and we can customize those according to our queries."
"We can create our own templates."
"We feel the interface is very good. It is very easy to use, even a nontechnical person can use it."
"When it comes to the process, installation is very easy and does not take long."
"Using Rapid7, we can install a scan engine, we can do our VPN connections, and we can conduct internal scans of remote sites. We prefer the web application. It's smarter and more accurate from an application perspective."
"InsightVM's best features are the vulnerability database and remediation steps."
"It is a very, very user-friendly tool...The setup is easy"
"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."
"The solution is very simple to use."
"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."
"The solution is quite friendly."
"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is an easy-to-use product. I"
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"It is quite straightforward to set up."
"There are end-user needs and expectations that are being overlooked in the development that could be addressed by appointing a customer advisory board."
"There should be containerization within the VM."
"We'd like the agent to cover more compliance issues."
"It would be nice to have an additional feature that would provide reports on who has logged onto the console or who did what on the console."
"This solution integrates with another module in Metasploit, that doesn't exist in the other solutions. It is subscribed to on our roadmap, but we chose to implement both Nexppose and AppSpider."
"The integration with other solutions like JIRA could be better. Perhaps there could be some additional updates in the next phase that could integrate with it, so then you can proceed with the VT much easier."
"There is a significant learning curve, that non-technical individuals, especially those not specialized in computer science or the information security industry, might face."
"One area I would like to improve in InsightVM is its integration with other solutions."
"We'd like to see a bit more user-friendliness."
"The interface could be improved; right now it's running on two interfaces simultaneously."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable."
"They need to have more dependable and faster support."
"The product is a bit expensive."
"The user interface could be improved by being able to change the user interface to fit your position or your job. The graphs are set in stone and you can only print reports."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 38 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Arctic Wolf Managed Risk, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Orca Security. See our Rapid7 InsightVM vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.