We performed a comparison between Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features are its reporting capabilities and the host discovery functionality."
"It's easy to use. It's fast, it's a powerful easy to access tool."
"We are very satisfied with the reports, as they provide us with the information that is required for our management."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The remediation project is a pretty effective because it allows us, as clients or countries, to choose specific assets and set limitations on them for a certain period which allows us to track and follow up on those limitations. However, when it comes to real-time monitoring and live dashboards, InsightVM doesn't quite fit the bill. It's not a real-time solution and is not instant."
"It is good and fits well with pretty much all of our use case needs."
"You can bring in and get online to do reports fairly quickly,"
"I really love the new platform. It is really easy to understand, use, and deploy."
"I think that this is a good solution for evaluating vulnerability in the network."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are the reports and the dashboards."
"Initial setup was pretty straightforward."
"Tenable SC's most valuable features are the low number of false positives and the strong capability of providing prioritization for the vulnerabilities detected."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."
"The solution has a lean and easy-to-use interface that is not confusing to first-time users."
"The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs."
"The Auto-Remediate feature is good."
"The team needs to improve the speed and focus on the new bandwidth feed. Sometimes, it takes a while to scan, especially with new updates."
"InsightVM is getting a little stale and is in danger of falling behind its competitors."
"There needs to be much clearer instructions surrounding scanning."
"Within InsightVM, there is no feature to assign a ticket. If we can have more API calls, we can do that from InsightVM."
"The solution should include a tighter integration with third-party threat modeling and threat intelligence tools."
"This solution creates false-positives which can cause issues with reporting."
"There should be containerization within the VM."
"The solution needs to improve its vulnerability design to include CVC results."
"At times we have had the typical bugs."
"Tenable SC can improve by making it easier to create complicated reports and have more effectiveness in the remediation area for comparison between the scans."
"Tenable.sc's user interface could be improved."
"The solution should include compliance-based scanning."
"Tenable SC could be improved with additional connectivity to external company postures and the capability of managing and sustaining agents in the systems directly without additional platforms in the middle."
"Additional costs are associated with using the solution, as additional scanners are required for different endpoints connected to the Tenable Security Center. If Tenable Security Center could extract information from these scanners automatically rather than manually, it would enhance user-friendliness for customers."
"The biggest issue I have with the solution is when I'm using the scanning it picks up the original DNS of that device. That means, before we image it and actually change the DNS to something within our company structure, it'll just be random numbers and letters and Tenable will stick to that DNS for a long time."
"The product could be user-friendly, and they could enhance the web application's security features."
Rapid7 InsightVM is ranked 4th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 55 reviews while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Rapid7 InsightVM is rated 8.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightVM writes "You can scan a network, and receive recommendations to address vulnerabilities with the click of a button". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Rapid7 InsightVM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management, Rapid7 InsightIDR and Wiz, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Horizon3.ai and Tanium. See our Rapid7 InsightVM vs. Tenable Security Center report.
See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.