Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs UiPath Process Mining comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Process Mining
Ranking in Process Mining
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 1.8%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Process Mining is 6.6%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
Rahul Sharma. - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task
UiPath Process Mining is as lightweight a tool as it is new. It's not able to handle a lot of logs in one go at high speed. The solution's speed is fairly good, but it should be further increased to make it more powerful to process large amounts of logs. Logs should be as much as possible. We have taken one year's and sometimes two years' logs to understand the behavior. We are not here solving small problems because a lot of money is invested. I have observed that handling a large amount of logs slows down the solution's performance. This area is improving because we are now observing a new version of UiPath Process Mining with improved speed. As a developer, I'll be happy to see that happening more quickly, and I am sure the solution is heading there.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"UiPath Process Mining is scalable."
"UiPath provides exceptional customer service and support, primarily due to its active community forum, community.uipath.com, which offers 24/7 support from developers and community members."
"I have found the most valuable features to be virtualization, multi-user, developer tools, API analytics, and workflow management."
"So far, we are just testing it and seeking out use cases, however, so far, it's been an interesting solution to work with."
"It's very useful in turning raw data into actionable information."
"The best feature of UiPath Process Mining, compared to a process discovery tool or mining tool I forgot the name of, is that UiPath Process Mining supplies more details about your current workflow and how it influences the business, including what's the delay or roadblock. The other tool doesn't give you detailed information, so UiPath Process Mining has a significant advantage."
"Its speediness is most valuable. It is quick to develop. It is also quick and easy to learn."
"The core mining analysis is strong."
 

Cons

"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"Its license structure is complex."
"It's not very easy to turn raw data into actionable information."
"Has a very limited way of collecting process data."
"Within UiPath, AI Fabric is a valuable feature, but Process Mining can be further improved with AI. AI is booming. Once they improve the AI capabilities, more and more customers will come to UiPath."
"The solution's UI and UX could be made better."
"The interface could be more user-friendly so that it is easier for business people to use."
"One area for improvement is the integration with legacy systems, which can be challenging, especially with older and in-house developed systems that lack good event logs."
"When I used UiPath, there were no connectors to extract data from databases or data warehouses."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"UiPath Process Mining has different licensing types for users, developers, end-users, or designers. I don't have the figures, price-wise, but because my company is a UiPath partner, there's some discount offered when you buy in bulk. UiPath provides a good deal if you're a bulk user. UiPath Process Mining gives you value for money compared to some of its competitors in the market."
"Our licensing for UiPath Process Mining and the various tools such as Studio Orchestrator is all paid for on an annual basis. However, with the Document Understanding feature, the licensing is per page. So if we're going to read some 20,000-30,000 pages, that becomes one separate licensing stack."
"It is extremely expensive."
"UiPath Process Mining is better priced than Celonis, which we found to be on the costlier side."
"The price of UiPath Process Mining could improve."
"The pricing is on the higher side."
"UiPath Process Mining is a bit overpriced for someone considering the solution without knowing for sure whether it will help them."
"UiPath Process Mining is not very expensive, and that is where it beats Celonis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
862,452 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
25%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about UiPath Process Mining?
I would rate the stability of UiPath Process Mining a nine out of ten.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Process Mining?
UiPath Process Mining is better priced than Celonis, which we found to be on the costlier side.
What needs improvement with UiPath Process Mining?
Adoption is the key. The solution can give great results, but many times, we struggle to drive adoption.
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProcessGold
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Lotte Corporation, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Sunway Group, Deloitte, Heritage Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
862,452 professionals have used our research since 2012.