We performed a comparison between QPR ProcessAnalyzer and UiPath Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis, UiPath, Automation Anywhere and others in Process Mining."I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"The most valuable feature of UiPath Process Mining is the process graph, which gives you a depiction of the process and lets you know where the issues and delays are occurring."
"The solution has some quality and time assurances to improve our business."
"The solution counts the number of cross-sections at each step of the year which allows you to see all the data to figure out what is happening in the company. You do not need to manually collect data, it continuously updates the data. Overall the solution is easy to use and has dashboards."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis of operational processes."
"You can build flows with this product."
"The best feature of UiPath Process Mining, compared to a process discovery tool or mining tool I forgot the name of, is that UiPath Process Mining supplies more details about your current workflow and how it influences the business, including what's the delay or roadblock. The other tool doesn't give you detailed information, so UiPath Process Mining has a significant advantage."
"The core mining analysis is strong."
"With UiPath in place, we are moving away from training people on the core applications, which are pretty complex. We've built a headless frontend, so it's really easy for anybody to join our company and be productive."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"Has a very limited way of collecting process data."
"I would like to see better integration with the Azure and AWS machine learning platforms."
"While it is fairly stable, this is something that could be improved."
"The remote desktop we utilize suffers from inconsistent performance, sometimes functioning well and other times not."
"UiPath Process Mining is not easy for everyday users."
"Improvements could be made in educating a new support team for enhanced efficiency and effectiveness."
"An area for improvement in UiPath Process Mining is that its pricing is too expensive, particularly when compared to Power Automate."
"It is stable, but not the top of the curve. It can be improved, let's put it that way."
Earn 20 points
QPR ProcessAnalyzer is ranked 15th in Process Mining while UiPath Process Mining is ranked 2nd in Process Mining with 74 reviews. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is rated 8.6, while UiPath Process Mining is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of QPR ProcessAnalyzer writes "Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Process Mining writes "A stable solution with a comparison feature that helps people to understand and visualize the impact of a particular task". QPR ProcessAnalyzer is most compared with Celonis and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, whereas UiPath Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Manager, FortressIQ, Minit and SAP Signavio Process Intelligence.
See our list of best Process Mining vendors.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.