No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs UiPath Process Mining comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Process Mining
Ranking in Process Mining
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.8%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Process Mining is 5.3%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
UiPath Process Mining5.3%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.8%
Other91.9%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
PrashantGupta3 - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President Intelligent Automation at 360 One
Automation in banking has reduced manual analysis and has provided consistent high ROI
UiPath Process Mining has provided us with FTE resource reductions, and we have achieved a health summary of this automation with around a 98-99% success rate, which helps us generate ROI on a month-to-month basis. I was part of the initial setup process for everything on the infrastructure side. The initial setup was quite easy with ease of installation because we had direct support from UiPath community, and the infrastructure team was also involved, making it an overall smooth journey for us. I have not communicated much with technical support over the years because UiPath has its community, which resolves most of our queries. On the rare occasions when we have contacted technical support, I found them to be really good, possessing excellent technical expertise, and every issue we raised was resolved 100%. I find UiPath Process Mining to be scalable, which is why we deployed it on AWS cloud, as we do not have to focus on scaling or increasing our automation use cases since we have set it up for auto-scaling. In terms of stability and reliability, I find UiPath Process Mining to be quite stable, and I would rate it around nine out of ten for the application's performance. Overall, I would rate this solution a 9 out of 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Most of the solutions in this categroy cover the main functionalities and QPR is very close to the top of the game."
"Its speediness is most valuable. It is quick to develop. It is also quick and easy to learn."
"It provides root cause analysis, which identifies delays and deviations in processes, visualizes bottlenecks, and assesses their impact with insightful visualizations."
"UiPath's human-in-the-loop features are helpful."
"If you're in a situation where UiPath will be helpful to you, then you're going to get an amazing return."
"UiPath Process Mining has a good roadmap ahead for the future."
"Their support is really good, and it is a stable product."
"It saves our clients a lot of time."
"UiPath Process Mining is scalable."
 

Cons

"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"We sometimes have problems with the stability."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The main issue for us is how data is being collected. I think a lot of Process Mining's tool has a very limited way of collecting process data."
"The product has to be simplified because there are some facets that are just too complex. It's not easy for everyone to understand. You have to do training on ProcessGold and then you can use it."
"What needs improvement in UiPath Process Mining is manual delay support. For example, I have a pending workflow, and I've not taken action in the last five or ten days, and because of this, the whole process gets delayed, but UiPath Process Mining doesn't provide any manual delay insights. It gives about seventy to seventy-five percent detail on end-to-end process delays, the scope of automation, or the gap, but not about the manual delay, so what would make the solution better is if it communicates manual delay information. Every business process relies on human activity, with either approval or review, so UiPath Process Mining should capture that area and provide a workflow or diagram that shows more details, such as the impact of the delay, the workflow time without the human delay, etc. That could be too difficult, but it's what I'm expecting as a customer. More automation in UiPath Process Mining would be great."
"There is room for improvement in the design studios. Design studios and exception handling are the two that we usually migrate to Blue Prism because Blue Prism's exception handling and design studios are much more user-friendly."
"There is always a challenge with the infrastructure set up for the client."
"There should be better handling of errors or exceptions."
"Process mining could improve in optimization of resources."
"Process mining is something that we are doing, but I think it needs to be more mature. UiPath is still new to process mining. They are decent in SAP ERP when it comes to process mining. But compared to Oracle's E-Business Suite and all, they are still pretty new."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"It is very expensive."
"UiPath Process Mining is priced high compared to other solutions."
"UiPath's licensing is based on how many documents we process using this solution."
"The price of UiPath Process Mining could improve."
"There is a standard licensing fee, which is charged for the products, but it is very module-driven and depends on your utilization or your team size. Compared to that of other providers, the cost is average or below average. So, from a pricing perspective, it's not very high."
"Licensing costs for UiPath are very reasonable, in my opinion."
"The licensing cost depends on the enterprise, and the discounts and offers available at the time. The price of the solution is reasonable."
"UiPath Process Mining pricing is comparable to other tools in the market."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Construction Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise43
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Process Mining?
Regarding pricing and overall licensing cost, for existing UiPath customers, it is reasonable. However, for those solely interested in process mining without existing UiPath usage, Celonis is gener...
What needs improvement with UiPath Process Mining?
In terms of improvement, I do not think much could be enhanced because it gives us good output. However, in terms of optimization, we can consider further enhancements. There are a few use cases wh...
What is your primary use case for UiPath Process Mining?
Our major use case related to banking and BFSI domains is to start with business automation. We conduct process mining to determine the ROI and other benefits from this automation. UiPath Process M...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProcessGold
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Lotte Corporation, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Sunway Group, Deloitte, Heritage Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.