No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs UiPath Process Mining comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
11th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Process Mining
Ranking in Process Mining
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.5%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Process Mining is 5.3%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
UiPath Process Mining5.3%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.5%
Other92.2%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
GS
Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
End-to-end visibility and transparency help remove bottlenecks
UiPath Process Mining impacts our company positively by providing us with a lot of insights. It helps us optimize our shared services operations. We can see where the process bottlenecks are and address them. It's useful for optimization and reducing bottlenecks across the business processes. UiPath Process Mining helps to free up staff's time for other projects. UiPath Process Mining helps save 10% to 12% of our time. UiPath Process Mining helps us reduce our total cost of ownership (TCO). It helps us reduce our TCO by approximately 5%. It has potential, but we are not using it fully. UiPath Process Mining takes two to three months to implement and another two to three months to adopt. We could see its value within four to six months. UiPath Process Mining comes with quite a few connectors and tools, so its integration capability is decent. UiPath Process Mining provides excellent end-to-end visibility as long as you have the right data source systems and quality. Many times, we struggle with data quality, but if you have good quality data, it provides you with good end-to-end results.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"Most of the solutions in this categroy cover the main functionalities and QPR is very close to the top of the game."
"UiPath Process Mining is scalable."
"Once you understand the flow, using Process Mining to streamline processes is easy. It has drag-and-drop abilities that make it very easy to operate."
"The tool definitely increases process transparency, though improvements in orchestration integration would be beneficial."
"We haven't automated processes based on UiPath Process Mining, but we've used it to gain insight into our processes. It also helps us refine and speed up our standard operating procedures."
"You can build flows with this product."
"I think Process Mining's most important feature is the process mapping tool."
"UiPath's human-in-the-loop features are helpful."
"The capabilities are strong and the product performs at a high level."
 

Cons

"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"We sometimes have problems with the stability."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The dashboard could be improved by allowing customization and they could introduce a Mac version of the solution."
"It should be more intuitive and easy to work with. There should be more ways of creating filters, and it should be easy to make our own customized dashboards."
"Unlike scan.ai, UiPath Process Mining doesn't provide high-level insights. It isn't easy to integrate. They should stop selling and try to bring more value into the system. A person can have only 10 UiPath Process Mining licenses, but nobody uses them, so in hindsight, everybody feels like UiPath is a failed product."
"The training materials sometimes don't keep up with the system changes."
"UiPath Process Mining is not easy for everyday users."
"The ability to transform raw data into actionable information can be challenging due to the variability in our customers' processes."
"UiPath Process Mining is associated with a high cost and a difficult learning curve for those unfamiliar with process mining tools."
"The installation documentation and guides for users from UiPath Process Mining could be a little better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"UiPath Process Mining is better priced than Celonis, which we found to be on the costlier side."
"UiPath Process Mining pricing is comparable to other tools in the market."
"It is extremely expensive."
"The price of UiPath Process Mining could improve."
"The pricing is on the higher side."
"Licensing costs for UiPath are very reasonable, in my opinion."
"Licensing costs are on an annual basis."
"UiPath Process Mining is not very expensive, and that is where it beats Celonis."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise42
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Process Mining?
Regarding pricing and overall licensing cost, for existing UiPath customers, it is reasonable. However, for those solely interested in process mining without existing UiPath usage, Celonis is gener...
What needs improvement with UiPath Process Mining?
In future releases, better integration towards overall business process orchestration would be beneficial for UiPath Process Mining.
What is your primary use case for UiPath Process Mining?
The use cases for UiPath Process Mining vary, but it is recommended where companies have a level of maturity in understanding their processes, yet haven't fully mapped them and utilized data. We us...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProcessGold
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Lotte Corporation, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Sunway Group, Deloitte, Heritage Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.