No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs UiPath Process Mining comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Process Mining
Ranking in Process Mining
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.9%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Process Mining is 5.6%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
UiPath Process Mining5.6%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.9%
Other91.5%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
PrashantGupta3 - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President Intelligent Automation at 360 One
Automation in banking has reduced manual analysis and has provided consistent high ROI
UiPath Process Mining has provided us with FTE resource reductions, and we have achieved a health summary of this automation with around a 98-99% success rate, which helps us generate ROI on a month-to-month basis. I was part of the initial setup process for everything on the infrastructure side. The initial setup was quite easy with ease of installation because we had direct support from UiPath community, and the infrastructure team was also involved, making it an overall smooth journey for us. I have not communicated much with technical support over the years because UiPath has its community, which resolves most of our queries. On the rare occasions when we have contacted technical support, I found them to be really good, possessing excellent technical expertise, and every issue we raised was resolved 100%. I find UiPath Process Mining to be scalable, which is why we deployed it on AWS cloud, as we do not have to focus on scaling or increasing our automation use cases since we have set it up for auto-scaling. In terms of stability and reliability, I find UiPath Process Mining to be quite stable, and I would rate it around nine out of ten for the application's performance. Overall, I would rate this solution a 9 out of 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"Most of the solutions in this categroy cover the main functionalities and QPR is very close to the top of the game."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"The library that I can implement in the current bot is great."
"The reporting features of ProcessGold are the most valuable, creating things in a manner by which they can be easily represented to the business so the business can easily understand what actually happened in the process."
"The most valuable feature is that activities are available to us just by clicking the box, so it doesn't require much time to make changes for future requirements."
"The best feature of UiPath Process Mining, compared to a process discovery tool or mining tool I forgot the name of, is that UiPath Process Mining supplies more details about your current workflow and how it influences the business, including what's the delay or roadblock. The other tool doesn't give you detailed information, so UiPath Process Mining has a significant advantage."
"The solution has some quality and time assurances to improve our business."
"For us, the most important feature of UiPath Process Mining is something called Document Understanding. We have found it to be extremely valuable, given that the current situation we have right now is that it's not just pure automation of manual and repetitive tasks. What we're doing is more along the lines of what you could call "intelligent" automation. Document Understanding plays a great role in this type of process automation because it helps us in automating the reading of documents better and, therefore, helps to automate intelligence for our customers."
"UiPath Process Mining has provided us with FTE resource reductions, and we have achieved a health summary of this automation with around a 98-99% success rate, which helps us generate ROI on a month-to-month basis."
"The most valuable feature is the AI center for document understanding."
 

Cons

"Communication with clients could be improved."
"We sometimes have problems with the stability."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"It is very expensive."
"Process mining is something that we are doing, but I think it needs to be more mature. UiPath is still new to process mining. They are decent in SAP ERP when it comes to process mining. But compared to Oracle's E-Business Suite and all, they are still pretty new."
"An area for improvement in UiPath Process Mining is that its pricing is too expensive, particularly when compared to Power Automate."
"We found that the flow chart is not very clear for some of the complex processes."
"It is an expensive solution. It would be good if the company could consider some type of change to the licensing model that could help clients better regulate the costs in different ways."
"The main issue for us is how data is being collected. I think a lot of Process Mining's tool has a very limited way of collecting process data."
"The tool could be improved by making integration simpler with most applications."
"I would like a few tutorials that explain step by step how to start, including a few tips for new users."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"The product is affordable. It depends on if you are looking for some capabilities from time to time."
"Our licensing for UiPath Process Mining and the various tools such as Studio Orchestrator is all paid for on an annual basis. However, with the Document Understanding feature, the licensing is per page. So if we're going to read some 20,000-30,000 pages, that becomes one separate licensing stack."
"Licensing costs for UiPath are very reasonable, in my opinion."
"UiPath Process Mining pricing is comparable to other tools in the market."
"The licensing cost depends on the enterprise, and the discounts and offers available at the time. The price of the solution is reasonable."
"There is a standard licensing fee, which is charged for the products, but it is very module-driven and depends on your utilization or your team size. Compared to that of other providers, the cost is average or below average. So, from a pricing perspective, it's not very high."
"UiPath Process Mining is not very expensive, and that is where it beats Celonis."
"The pricing for the product is high. You pay a licensing fee and an additional 20% for support and maintenance."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Construction Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise43
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Process Mining?
Regarding pricing and overall licensing cost, for existing UiPath customers, it is reasonable. However, for those solely interested in process mining without existing UiPath usage, Celonis is gener...
What needs improvement with UiPath Process Mining?
In terms of improvement, I do not think much could be enhanced because it gives us good output. However, in terms of optimization, we can consider further enhancements. There are a few use cases wh...
What is your primary use case for UiPath Process Mining?
Our major use case related to banking and BFSI domains is to start with business automation. We conduct process mining to determine the ROI and other benefits from this automation. UiPath Process M...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProcessGold
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Lotte Corporation, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Sunway Group, Deloitte, Heritage Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.