No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs UiPath Process Mining comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
10th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Process Mining
Ranking in Process Mining
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
82
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.7%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Process Mining is 5.4%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
UiPath Process Mining5.4%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.7%
Other91.9%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.
PrashantGupta3 - PeerSpot reviewer
Vice President Intelligent Automation at 360 One
Automation in banking has reduced manual analysis and has provided consistent high ROI
UiPath Process Mining has provided us with FTE resource reductions, and we have achieved a health summary of this automation with around a 98-99% success rate, which helps us generate ROI on a month-to-month basis. I was part of the initial setup process for everything on the infrastructure side. The initial setup was quite easy with ease of installation because we had direct support from UiPath community, and the infrastructure team was also involved, making it an overall smooth journey for us. I have not communicated much with technical support over the years because UiPath has its community, which resolves most of our queries. On the rare occasions when we have contacted technical support, I found them to be really good, possessing excellent technical expertise, and every issue we raised was resolved 100%. I find UiPath Process Mining to be scalable, which is why we deployed it on AWS cloud, as we do not have to focus on scaling or increasing our automation use cases since we have set it up for auto-scaling. In terms of stability and reliability, I find UiPath Process Mining to be quite stable, and I would rate it around nine out of ten for the application's performance. Overall, I would rate this solution a 9 out of 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Most of the solutions in this categroy cover the main functionalities and QPR is very close to the top of the game."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
"UiPath Process Mining has improved our organization by clearing invoices, as we use it to take information from the manual invoice generated by the suppliers to read, scan, and input the invoice data into the SAP system for clearance."
"The reporting features of ProcessGold are great."
"For us, the most important feature of UiPath Process Mining is something called Document Understanding. We have found it to be extremely valuable, given that the current situation we have right now is that it's not just pure automation of manual and repetitive tasks. What we're doing is more along the lines of what you could call "intelligent" automation. Document Understanding plays a great role in this type of process automation because it helps us in automating the reading of documents better and, therefore, helps to automate intelligence for our customers."
"There were a lot of gaps in our process, and UiPath Process Mining allowed us to find and fill those gaps, so now the process takes less time, and the customer outcome delivery has been improved."
"The library that I can implement in the current bot is great."
"Process mining helped in understanding data complexity and security, determining if human validation was required before dispatching credits or debits in SAP, and creating a comprehensive blueprint of the process."
"Simple solution that allows us to write code."
"By automating the document filing system for our customer with an insurance domain, we were able to save them eight to nine years of individual-person-effort with regard to filing."
 

Cons

"We sometimes have problems with the stability."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"It should be more intuitive and easy to work with. There should be more ways of creating filters, and it should be easy to make our own customized dashboards. Currently, if I want to create a dashboard similar to the one we have in AppOne but with different attributes, it is very difficult. There are activities, but I don't want activities. I want other attributes. Its user interface is not very intuitive. You need to play around with it. I have been playing around with the UiPath Process Mining tool for almost two years, and now I feel confident in handling it. It is a difficult tool."
"The ability to transform raw data into actionable information can be challenging due to the variability in our customers' processes."
"UiPath could improve on how it works with the project management process and flow."
"There should be better handling of errors or exceptions."
"The number of file formats that can be uploaded should be increased."
"Integration with new technologies should be kept up-to-date so they can be adopted as they are released."
"Setting up UiPath is relatively complex. It potentially involves multiple business units. First, you need to set up the connectors. If you want to analyze enterprise performance, you will have to do enterprise connectors, which means you must deal with different system owners, security, and things like that. That can get complicated."
"We received adequate support, but sometimes the turn around time to get into a particular root cause was high."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
"We pay yearly, and I believe a support fee is paid monthly."
"The licenses are flexible, they start once they are activated. The license is purchased annually. The cost of the solution is very good compared to other similar solutions."
"The cost of UiPath Process Mining is costly but there are no additional costs in addition to the licensing fee."
"UiPath Process Mining is priced high compared to other solutions."
"The licensing cost depends on the enterprise, and the discounts and offers available at the time. The price of the solution is reasonable."
"UiPath's licensing is based on how many documents we process using this solution."
"Licensing costs are on an annual basis."
"UiPath Process Mining has different licensing types for users, developers, end-users, or designers. I don't have the figures, price-wise, but because my company is a UiPath partner, there's some discount offered when you buy in bulk. UiPath provides a good deal if you're a bulk user. UiPath Process Mining gives you value for money compared to some of its competitors in the market."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Marketing Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Construction Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business34
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise43
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Process Mining?
Regarding pricing and overall licensing cost, for existing UiPath customers, it is reasonable. However, for those solely interested in process mining without existing UiPath usage, Celonis is gener...
What needs improvement with UiPath Process Mining?
In future releases, better integration towards overall business process orchestration would be beneficial for UiPath Process Mining.
What is your primary use case for UiPath Process Mining?
The use cases for UiPath Process Mining vary, but it is recommended where companies have a level of maturity in understanding their processes, yet haven't fully mapped them and utilized data. We us...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ProcessGold
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Lotte Corporation, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Sunway Group, Deloitte, Heritage Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about QPR ProcessAnalyzer vs. UiPath Process Mining and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.