Celonis vs QPR ProcessAnalyzer comparison

Celonis and QPR Software are both solutions in the Process Mining category. Celonis is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while QPR Software is ranked #12. Celonis holds a 15.7% mindshare in PM, compared to QPR Software’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Celonis users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of QPR Software users who would recommend it.

Celonis

Read 60 Celonis reviews

7,007 Views
3,153 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Read 2 QPR ProcessAnalyzer reviews

423 Views
423 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Celonis

QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Celonis and QPR ProcessAnalyzer are competitors in the process mining solutions category. QPR ProcessAnalyzer has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features, despite competitive pricing and support from Celonis.

Features: Celonis focuses on advanced data integration, powerful analytics, and process optimization. QPR ProcessAnalyzer offers strong visual analytics, customizability, and in-depth process discovery.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Celonis provides a straightforward deployment process with training and support resources. QPR ProcessAnalyzer features a flexible deployment model and efficient customer service, adaptable to various operational environments.

Pricing and ROI: Celonis has a more cost-effective initial setup with scalable pricing. QPR ProcessAnalyzer requires a higher initial cost but offers substantial ROI with its feature suite and adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Celonis

Ranking in Process Mining

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Data Analysis (6th)

QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Ranking in Process Mining

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of Celonis is 15.7%, down from 19.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.2%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Celonis	15.7%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer	2.2%
Other	82.1%

Process Mining

Featured Reviews

Ebin_Abraham

Data Engineer at Baker Hughes

Process mining has delivered major savings and now needs better automation and task mining

Collaboration with ERPs should be improved. Compared to SAP Signavio, Celonis is less competitive for BPMN modeling. Deployment flexibility needs enhancement, as on-premises support is not as strong as SaaS support. The most important area for improvement is the automation part. End-to-end automation capabilities are desired. Currently, workflows are being used, but actions should be able to go via email, task, APIs, and ultimately write back to the source. Adding RPA capability that can interact with required systems and write back to the source would greatly enhance Celonis. Task mining capabilities also require improvement. UiPath Process Mining and Microsoft Process Mining have better task mining capabilities compared to Celonis. Usability and support from Celonis need improvement. They should help clients find more value in the product. Cost is another significant concern, as Celonis is very expensive compared to other process mining tools. The license cost should be reduced. Celonis should establish partnerships with clients to find more use cases and maximize the value gained from Celonis.

Read full review

reviewer1282173

Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple

We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the spaghetti it throws off when configuring the sequence of processes and tracking the endpoint. I also like the variation from these defined processes and what is being observed on the ground. I'm exploring the root cause analysis a lot these days, and it seems to be quite interesting. But again, there are a lot of external dependencies on that. But I think the spaghetti, and the one that shows the variation and the performance gap, is something which I really like."

"The solution offers very good division management."

"We have found the Orient Explorer to be a valuable feature."

"Celonis' best feature is a new one called Action Flow, an enhanced version of earlier automation features with lots of integration options with other systems so you can access third-party systems and automate some actions there too."

"We can observe the flow and invoices."

"I have seen a positive impact of Celonis in my organization, as I receive many testimonials from clients mentioning that process mining has genuinely helped, especially through Celonis."

"The solution has very detailed documentation for technical items so it is very easy for developers to use."

"Technical support is really good. For me, the sales support matters more. When I'm in a sales cycle, the Celonis sales teams are very helpful. They reach out to me from day zero."

More Celonis pros

"Discovery and root cause analysis"

"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."

Cons

"The UI could be improved."

"The price could be better, but complexity is the biggest problem. Celonis is quite easy to operate once the customizations are done. You need a large amount of skill and knowledge to work with the tool. You need to understand it and know more than the basics."

"They could provide artificial intelligence where, based on data they collect from reference cases, they could give us suggestions."

"It could be less expensive."

"For example, we would like to see improvement of the simulation capabilities to include a BPMN-compliant modeler. That is, we would like to be able to connect the simulation to the BPMN modeler. I think it's one of the features that is missing in Celonis."

"Celonis needs to improve the feature channel. They should incorporate more generative AI elements into their solution."

"Essentially, the solution should allow for more plug and play instead of requiring a person to be adept at a certain level in coding and developing."

"In the solution, you have access to how the process is, and are able to integrate that with other systems that allow you to make changes to the process itself, this process can be improved."

More Celonis cons

"Communication with clients could be improved."

"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is quite a significant investment. From a cost perspective, they need to reevaluate the licensing model. The cost is justified, but they need to make the licensing model slightly different."

"The price could be better. If you ask a customer, they will always say it's highly-priced. In my personal opinion, the cost can be at the lower end. I think it's suitable for large organizations at this point in time."

"Evaluating the price of the solution can be a difficult question. It is all about the business case and the return of the investments. That is typically how we also see this type of solution. It depends very much on the return. The entry-level is focused on enterprise size companies, for the SMB segment is it is out of their range. It is definitely expensive."

"Pricing-wise, Celonis is a five out of ten right now because my clients just started with the solution. When my clients start looking at scaling Celonis, the cost will grow. Every user has an additional charge, and every gig of data you bring in costs extra."

"I was not involved in that, but I am sure it was cost-effective for them. That's why they made the decision to take it."

"Celonis is cost-effective."

"Though Celonis is a bit pricey, it is worth it."

"Celonis offers free learning possibilities. I am using the free version of Celonis."

More Celonis pricing and cost advice

"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	44

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Celonis?

Celonis, especially for high-risk finance-related processes, helped us make precise decisions and uncover hidden values within our architecture. It was one of the most significant values our busine...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?

I am not heavily involved in that particular aspect, but I have heard that Celonis is somewhat expensive.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Celonis

Compared 50% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs Celonis

Compared 11% of the time

UiPath Process Mining vs Celonis

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Celonis

Compared 6% of the time

BIC Process Mining vs Celonis

Compared 2% of the time

More Celonis Competitors

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence vs QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Compared 24% of the time

UiPath Process Mining vs QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Compared 16% of the time

More QPR ProcessAnalyzer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Celonis

March 2026

Download Celonis product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Mining

March 2026

Download QPR ProcessAnalyzer product report

Overview

Celonis is the global leader in execution management. Powered by its process mining core, Celonis has evolved from its beginnings as a Process Mining company into an execution management pioneer, enabling companies to unlock execution capacity and perform at full potential. Celonis offers advanced technology in data execution, combining real-time process data, the intelligence to make sense of that data, and the execution capacity to take immediate, decisive action. Celonis’ Execution Management System makes data work for its customers by identifying inefficiencies and weaving interconnected processes together – thereby eliminating billions in corporate inefficiencies, empowering better business decisions and triggering the right actions automatically. Celonis is headquartered in Munich, Germany and New York City, USA and has 15 offices worldwide.

Celonis

Cutting-edge process mining: The fast track to improved business performance
Taking the time to study the flow of your operations is always a good idea – no matter how your business is doing. When things are going well, you may discover ways to make them even better. And if it's not going so well, you need to be sure to understand the real rather than the perceived nature of the problem.

So what's the best way to analyze your operations?
There are basically two options. The first is to ask employees, customers and other stakeholders for feedback. The second way is Process Mining. In other words: you ask the data.

Gathering information from the people involved with your business can be very valuable, but it may not give you the full picture. Process Mining with QPR ProcessAnalyzer will.

QPR ProcessAnalyzer is an enterprise-grade software product for advanced process mining. Smart, quick-to-install, and easy-to-use, it rapidly studies your operational data and immediately identifies concrete ways to improve your business.

QPR Software

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool

Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways

Buyer's Guide

Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer

March 2026

Free Report: Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer

Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer report.

See our list of best Process Mining vendors.

We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.