Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Celonis vs QPR ProcessAnalyzer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Celonis
Ranking in Process Mining
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
AI Data Analysis (6th)
QPR ProcessAnalyzer
Ranking in Process Mining
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Process Mining category, the mindshare of Celonis is 16.9%, down from 18.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is 2.3%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Mining Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Celonis16.9%
QPR ProcessAnalyzer2.3%
Other80.8%
Process Mining
 

Featured Reviews

GM
Management Data Engineer & Governance Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Process mining expertise has uncovered root causes and is driving revenue-focused decisions
There are a few things about Celonis that need improvement. One specific limitation is in the view module; when creating a filter bar, I cannot resize the filter section beyond the default size provided by Celonis. If I wish to include more than 15 filters, I cannot do so due to this limitation. Additionally, I feel that Copilot feature has several areas for improvement, as it sometimes gets stuck after providing a few responses, requiring me to restart the chat. For specific incidents, if I mention an incident with a certain service tier, the system uses the like operator and shows related results that may not be exactly what I need, which I have already raised with Celonis support team for resolution.
reviewer1282173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a consultancy with 1-10 employees
Useful dashboards, plenty of features, and initial setup simple
We previously worked with other solutions, such as Software AG for process monitoring. It was a good solution. All the products that we worked with have very good functionality. We are mostly working with QPR ProcessAnalyzer, but we may work again with the Software AG process analysis software. QPR ProcessAnalyzer is suited for the mid-scale market while Software AG servers mostly the higher-level market. All the products can work and can do the work for us.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In my opinion, it's quite an advanced tool."
"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. It's very good. It offers good data consistently."
"The most valuable features are process mining, task mining, business analytics, and machine learning."
"Celonis is intuitive, powerful, and user-friendly."
"The documentation, multi-hop analysis, and SLA breaches are the most valuable features we have discovered."
"Celonis has positively impacted my organization as it holds a Titanium partnership with Celonis."
"find Action Engine for notifying the user, and also Studio Spark, and knowledge models; all these features are useful."
"The solution has very detailed documentation for technical items so it is very easy for developers to use."
"Discovery and root cause analysis"
"I have found the most valuable features of QPR ProcessAnalyzer to be Process Discovery, KPIs, definition, and dashboarding. These are the main features we are working on."
 

Cons

"Celonis needs to improve the feature channel. They should incorporate more generative AI elements into their solution."
"They should leverage the solution's machine learning algorithms."
"The tool must have better process graphs."
"With every upgrade, the product is completely changed."
"The way they manage the data should also be improved. There is a lot of room for improvement there because a lot of duplicated data gets created, which should be improved. There should be ease of data management and code management."
"The marketplace should offer process connectors for Oracle JDEdwards, and Peoplesoft."
"Celonis should have the ability to automate in the next release, in my opinion."
"It requires specialized expertise to set it up in the backend."
"Communication with clients could be improved."
"The user interface of QPR ProcessAnalyzer could improve, it is not very intuitive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Celonis' pricing a ten out of ten because it is expensive."
"Celonis has the highest pricing in the process mining domain."
"The cost would be a concern for a certain category of customers. Flexible cost models would help smaller players be able to adapt Celonis into their business operations."
"Celonis is expensive, but it is functional."
"Though Celonis is a bit pricey, it is worth it."
"The solution’s pricing is based on APC. It charges you based on the amount of GV that you use."
"The price could be better. If you ask a customer, they will always say it's highly-priced. In my personal opinion, the cost can be at the lower end. I think it's suitable for large organizations at this point in time."
"The solution requires an annual license. There is room for improvement because it is priced for organizations and not for individuals. For an individual, it would be too expensive for them to use it."
"The price of QPR ProcessAnalyzer is more competitive compared to other solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
880,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise42
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?
SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...
What do you like most about Celonis?
Celonis, especially for high-risk finance-related processes, helped us make precise decisions and uncover hidden values within our architecture. It was one of the most significant values our busine...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?
I am not heavily involved in that particular aspect, but I have heard that Celonis is somewhat expensive.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool
Nokia, Ericsson,Solvay,KBC,fortum,Stark Group,Fennovoima,Aalto University,Vaisala,Kemira,Barona,State of Zacatecas,Tata Teleservices,Judiciary of Chile, World Vision, Lithuanian Public Healthcare, Dubai Aluminium,Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company,University of Latvia,South African Airways
Find out what your peers are saying about Celonis vs. QPR ProcessAnalyzer and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
880,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.