Pypestream vs Salesforce Community Cloud comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing for Salesforce CRM is extremely expensive."
  • More Salesforce Community Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Community Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:All the business intelligence included in the tool gives more information about the cycle of the sales stage.
    Top Answer:We pay the license annually for Salesforce CRM. Pricing is extremely expensive. I'm not aware of any hidden costs besides the cost of the license.
    Top Answer:The user interface of the screenshots feature is a little bit old and hasn't been updated for a long time.
    Ranking
    5th
    Views
    37
    Comparisons
    21
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    1st
    Views
    854
    Comparisons
    95
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    306
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Pypestream is a customer engagement solution founded to help enterprises establish a trusted direct to consumer relationship. We provide a two-way persistent connection via private messaging with AI-backed conversational experiences, or “pypes”. Pypestream digitally transforms and automates customer service, marketing & promotions, and business to employee engagements across a variety of industries.

    Salesforce Community Cloud, a social platform, that connects and collaborate with customers, partners, and employees. Build a community for everyone critical to your business ecosystem, from agencies, vendors, and suppliers, to patients, job applicants, and even retail locations. Community Cloud employs Salesforce's Chatter social CRM platform for chat and screensharing, allowing users to exchange data and images in real time throughout an ongoing conversation. The platform supports customer relationship management (CRM) and provides channels for customers to find information and communicate with other customers. The console also includes a "Buy" button to enable e-commerce.
    Sample Customers
    Solera, Sling TV, EY, TriWest Healthcare Alliance, Lincoln Center, Patients & Purpose, Insurance Thought Leadership
    Brown-Forman, GE Aviation, Pernod Ricard, Toyota, Virgin America, GE, IAVA
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    University12%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Salesforce Community Cloud vs. Zendesk
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce Community Cloud vs. Zendesk and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Pypestream is ranked 5th in Community Platforms while Salesforce Community Cloud is ranked 1st in Community Platforms with 2 reviews. Pypestream is rated 0.0, while Salesforce Community Cloud is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Salesforce Community Cloud writes "Helps us with sales management of customer life cycles with good business intelligence". Pypestream is most compared with , whereas Salesforce Community Cloud is most compared with Magnolia CMS, Adobe Experience Cloud and Lithium.

    See our list of best Community Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Community Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.