Pipedream vs webMethods.io comparison

Pipedream and IBM are both solutions in the API Management category. Pipedream is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.1. Pipedream holds a 0.1% mindshare in APIM, compared to IBM’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pipedream users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Pipedream

Read 4 Pipedream reviews

140 Views
50 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

3,033 Views
2,148 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Pipedream

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

WebMethods.io and Pipedream are competing in the integration platform category. WebMethods.io appears to have the upper hand in seamless integration and customer satisfaction, while Pipedream is favored for rapid deployment and development features.

Features: WebMethods.io offers robust integration capabilities with strong cloud connectivity and application integration, comprehensive connectors, advanced data mapping, and process automation across hybrid environments. Pipedream provides API-centric integration, powerful event-driven workflows, and a developer-friendly environment through code-level customization. It is flexible and caters to rapid prototyping and agile development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WebMethods.io features a straightforward deployment model supported by extensive documentation and support resources which streamline complex integrations. Its customer service provides detailed guidance and prompt resolution of technical queries. Pipedream benefits from swift deployment due to its lightweight, serverless architecture and offers community-driven support channels with collaborative knowledge sharing, though response times can vary compared to WebMethods.io.

Pricing and ROI: WebMethods.io has a higher initial setup cost but is balanced by strong ROI through comprehensive support and scalable solutions, catering to larger enterprises focused on long-term integration stability. Pipedream offers competitive pricing favored by start-ups and smaller companies preferring flexible, pay-as-you-go models. Its ROI is linked to speed and innovation, appealing to organizations prioritizing rapid deployment over extensive support infrastructure.

To learn more, read our detailed Pipedream vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Pipedream vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pipedream

Ranking in API Management

21st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in API Management

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (10th), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Pipedream is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 2.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Management

Featured Reviews

FrankHo

Analyst at MSXI

A tool that ensures that its users see a return on investment from its use

The UI and the fact that the product is not easy to use are areas with shortcomings where improvements are required. Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself. Pipedream is easy to use for someone with tech skills or someone new who is trying to learn how to code. Though it is user-friendly for people with tech skills, it is not at all user-friendly for people who do not have any tech skills. The user interface of Pipedream is very simple compared to the user interfaces of some other products like monday.com or Asana. Asana and monday.com have visually appealing user interfaces. The user interface of Pipedream is not visually appealing at all. The aforementioned details need to be considered for improvement in the solution. I just wish there was a little bit more documentation on how everything worked when it came to deployment since I was a fairly new employee at the company at that time. Sometimes, the workflow wouldn't work fine in Pipedream, and I had to check it myself for errors. Finding the errors in Pipedream is hard to find. I think it would be good if Pipedream had the ability to send an email to notify you that there is an error with the code instead of having to go back in and then look every day or every hour if there was an error in the code.

Read full review

Michele Illiano

Head of Division at Innovery

Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols

I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance. This is why, for most customers who have to deal with big files, I suggest that they use a product other than ActiveTransfer. I would like to note that this problem mainly concerns large files that undergo extra operations, such assigning, unassigning, or file translation. When these operations take place on large files, ActiveTransfer will use up a lot of resources. Within the product itself, I also believe that there is room for improvement in terms of optimization when it comes to general performance. I suspect that the issues underlying poor optimization are because it is all developed in Java. That is, all the objects and functions that are used need to be better organized, especially when it comes to big files but also overall. webMethods ActiveTransfer was born as an ESB to handle messages, and these messages were typically very short, i.e. small in size. A message is data that you have to send to an application, where it must be received in real-time and possibly processed or acknowledged elsewhere in the system as well. So, because it was initially designed for small messages, it struggles with performance when presented with very large files. All this to say, I suggest that they have an engineer reevaluate the architecture of the product in order to consider cases where large files are sent, and not only small ones. As for new features, compared to other products in the market, I think Software AG should be more up to date when it comes to extra protocol support, especially those protocols that other solutions have included in their products by default. Whenever we need to add an unsupported protocol, we have to go through the effort of custom development in order to work with it. Also, all the banks are obligated to migrate to the new standards, and big companies are all handling translations and operating their libraries with the new protocol formats. But webMethods ActiveTransfer doesn't seem to be keeping up with this evolution. Thus, they should aim to be more compliant in future, along the lines of their competitors such as IBM and Primeur.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Pipedream is the ability to use Python code in general."

"The most valuable features of Pipedream are the prebuilt integrations that require no coding."

"The solution enables users to integrate several things."

"It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts."

"The solution is scalable."

"A product with good API and EDI components."

"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."

"It's a good tool, and it has a stable messaging broker."

"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."

"One valuable feature is that it is event-driven, so when new data is available on the source it can be quickly processed and displayed. Integration is definitely another useful feature, and B2B is one area where webMethods has its own unique thing going, whereby we can do monitoring of transactions, monitoring of client onboarding, and so on."

"Most of the work in our organization can be more easily done using the tool."

"The product is very stable."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"There is a potential area for improvement in handling loop operations over items."

"They should give more information about trigger failure."

"We faced some server timeouts."

"Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself."

"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."

"The price has room for improvement."

"When migration happens from the one release to an upgraded release from Software AG, many of the existing services are deprecated and developers have to put in effort testing and redeveloping some of the services. It would be better that upgrade releases took care to support the lower-level versions of webMethods."

"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."

"There are things that could be improved with the webMethods API gateway. One thing is that it's too attached to the integration service and we'd like it to be a little bit more independent. We would like for them to separate operations so that it doesn't rely on the bulky integration server and so that it can be used everywhere."

"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."

"The on-premises setup can be difficult."

"Some of the things that we use cannot be done in this solution. For these things, we have to either use a Java service or a util service. There is no predefined or existing service that we can use. So, we have to work on the util service and write on top of it. Its price can also be better. It is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product price is fair and inexpensive than one of the competitors."

"Price-wise, for a company, it is a nice product, but for personal use, it is not very beneficial."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"There are no hidden costs in addition to the standard licensing fees for webMethods. For corporate organizations, it's a very cheap or fairly priced product, but for growing or small businesses, it's quite expensive. These businesses would probably need to consider an enterprise services bus at some point. Thus, from a pricing point, it closes out non-cooperate businesses."

"The product is expensive."

"I do see a lack of capabilities inside of the monetization area for them. They have a cloud infrastructure that is pay per use type of a thing. If you already use 1,000 transactions per se, then you can be charged and billed. I see room for improvement there for their side on that particular capability of the monetization."

"I would like to see better pricing for the license."

"Based on our team discussions and feedback, it is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pipedream?

It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pipedream?

The product price is fair and inexpensive than Zapier.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pipedream?

They could provide seamless integration with Jira, similar to classic code integration. Additionally, they should give more information about trigger failure.

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft API Manager vs Pipedream

Compared 100% of the time

More Pipedream Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

API Management

April 2025

Download Pipedream product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

April 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Pipedream is an innovative workflow automation platform designed to streamline and simplify complex data integrations and workflows. Its primary use case is to connect various applications, services, and APIs, enabling seamless data transfer and automation across different systems.

The most valuable functionality of Pipedream is its ability to create and manage workflows using a visual interface. Users can easily build and customize workflows by connecting different actions and triggers, without the need for coding. Pipedream supports a wide range of triggers and actions, allowing users to automate tasks such as data extraction, transformation, and loading, as well as event-driven actions like sending notifications or updating databases.

Pipedream helps organizations by reducing manual effort and improving efficiency. It enables teams to automate repetitive tasks, freeing up valuable time and resources. With its extensive library of pre-built integrations and connectors, Pipedream simplifies the process of connecting and integrating various systems, eliminating the need for custom development. This empowers organizations to quickly build and deploy complex workflows, accelerating their digital transformation initiatives.

Furthermore, Pipedream provides real-time monitoring and debugging capabilities, allowing users to track the execution of workflows and troubleshoot any issues. It also offers advanced features like version control and collaboration, enabling teams to work together on building and maintaining workflows.

Pipedream

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Pipedream vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Free Report: Pipedream vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Pipedream vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pipedream vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best API Management vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.