Pillir vs SS&C Blue Prism comparison

Pillir and SS&C Technologies are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Pillir is ranked #34, while SS&C Technologies is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.8. Pillir holds a 0.8% mindshare in LCDP, compared to SS&C Technologies’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Pillir users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of SS&C Technologies users who would recommend it.

Pillir

Read 2 Pillir reviews

378 Views
295 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SS&C Blue Prism

Read 5 SS&C Blue Prism reviews

1,928 Views
463 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Pillir

SS&C Blue Prism

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Pillir and SS&C Blue Prism are competing in the automation and digital transformation market. Pillir is preferred for its cost-effectiveness and customer service, whereas SS&C Blue Prism is favored for its advanced technological capabilities, justifying its higher cost.

Features: Pillir provides rapid application development, offline capabilities, and seamless SAP integration. SS&C Blue Prism is known for sophisticated robotic process automation, scalable infrastructure, and a focus on complex automation tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Pillir's cloud-based model allows for straightforward deployment and quick support response. SS&C Blue Prism requires on-premises deployment and offers comprehensive training and support resources suited for larger operations.

Pricing and ROI: Pillir offers competitive pricing with lower initial setup costs, ensuring faster ROI for budget-conscious businesses. SS&C Blue Prism, with its extensive features, requires a higher initial investment, offering long-term benefits for enterprises seeking scalable automation solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Pillir vs. SS&C Blue Prism Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Pillir vs. SS&C Blue Prism

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pillir

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

34th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (42nd)

SS&C Blue Prism

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (15th), Business Process Management (BPM) (16th), Process Automation (13th), Medical Insurance Claims Software (2nd), Insurance Claims Processing (3rd), Document Management Software (8th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (11th), Loan Management Software (3rd), Document Automation Software (3rd), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (19th), AI Customer Experience Personalization (11th), AI Finance & Accounting (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Pillir is 0.8%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SS&C Blue Prism is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SS&C Blue Prism	1.2%
Pillir	0.8%
Other	98.0%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

it_user130401

Application Developer Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees

Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model

I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment. We have people going through all of their shifts without connectivity, yet it automatically later synchronizes well with SAP, without creating extra documents or anything like that. The ability to take ABAP code and automatically convert it to a mobile app and then adjust it to our needs is something that I haven't seen in any other low-code solution on the market, and it has been life-changing for us. I love how easy it is to manage the design of the process using drag and drop. I know they are working to make the developer experience even better, and I'm very excited about it. The modernizer element that converts existing ABAP business logic to the cloud-native mobile-friendly solution is a very powerful tool that I haven't seen in the market.

Read full review

VikasKumar16

Technical Auditor at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has defined complex workflows and handled detailed automation scenarios efficiently

It requires extensive knowledge if somebody wants to work on SS&C Blue Prism, compared to other tools. The downside is you need to be very aware of the tool. You need to know how to write the workflow and have a detailed understanding of SS&C Blue Prism. It takes more time to learn compared to other tools in the market which are more user-friendly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."

"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."

"We have a lot of customer requests on a daily basis for different use cases, and we have different processes for that."

"Some important features include the language capabilities, which are crucial since RPA has to read the documents provided by the customer."

"The key feature of SS&C that I find valuable is the general workflow visibility."

"I find the design studio, where I can build the automation, and the control room feature, which allows me to run and monitor the automation, to be the most useful."

Cons

"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."

"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."

"Blue Prism is more costly than UiPath in terms of robotic licenses and orchestrators."

"I noticed that it lacks the ability to automatically record the process steps like some of its competitors."

"There is a need for improved integration with external systems in SS&C."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is straightforward consumption based on the number of end-users."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Retailer

18%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SS&C Blue Prism?

The pricing was not particularly competitive. It wasn't flexible for different geographies. For instance, in Africa, they didn't have a different pricing model to account for affordability. The pri...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SS&C Blue Prism?

It requires extensive knowledge if somebody wants to work on SS&C Blue Prism, compared to other tools. The downside is you need to be very aware of the tool. You need to know how to write the w...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SS&C Blue Prism?

My main use case for SS&C Blue Prism is automating business processes in different areas of the company, for legacy application automations, for SAP, different web services, and we provide that...

See all answers

Comparisons

Mendix vs Pillir

Compared 100% of the time

More Pillir Competitors

Alfresco vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 30% of the time

Camunda vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 13% of the time

FIS Commercial Lending Suite vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 11% of the time

IBM BPM vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs SS&C Blue Prism

Compared 8% of the time

More SS&C Blue Prism Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

November 2025

Download Pillir product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Design

December 2025

Download SS&C Blue Prism product report

Also Known As

appsFreedom

SS&C AWD

Overview

Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern cloud-native applications, available on the web and via any mobile device. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journey to accelerate their digital transformation, enabling innovation at the edge while maintaining a clean SAP digital core.

Pillir

SS&C Blue Prism, renowned for its language capabilities and workflow design, supports detailed automation building, enhancing productivity. Despite some challenges like cost and limited integration, it offers substantial potential in automating diverse processes.

SS&C Blue Prism offers strong capabilities in document reading and a straightforward workflow design, making it accessible with basic BPM knowledge. Detailed automation design in the studio and effective monitoring in the control room are notable features. While facing higher costs and a steeper learning curve, it supports process mining and generative AI initiatives, crucial for industries aiming at transformation and activation services. Limited external system integration and lack of agile delivery encourage a strategic approach in its deployment.

What are the key features?

Strong Language Capabilities: Essential for document reading and interpretation.
Straightforward Workflow Design: Provides ease of use for individuals with basic BPM knowledge.
Detailed Automation Building: Design studio allows comprehensive workflow definitions and scenario planning.
Effective Monitoring: Control room supports detailed automation oversight.

What ROI should users expect?

Efficiency in Task Automation: Automates repetitive tasks in back-office services.
Enhanced Process Integration: Facilitates automation by integrating data inputs in insurance sectors.
Support for Process Mining: Aids in generative AI initiatives and process transformation.
Complex Project Management: Useful in managing large-scale migration projects.

SS&C Blue Prism finds its application across industries. In service industries, it automates repetitive tasks while supporting migration projects. Within the insurance sector, it helps automate claims handling and pricing by integrating data efficiently. Companies use it when transitioning processes, such as upgrading systems from older versions to new applications.

SS&C Technologies

Sample Customers

Dole packaed food, Par Pacific, Brown Forman (Jack Daniels and other brands), Mobile Mini, Nabors

AWS, EY, Deloitte, ABBYY, Microsoft, GLYNT.AI, Pfizer, Invesco, Western Union

Buyer's Guide

Pillir vs. SS&C Blue Prism

December 2025

Free Report: Pillir vs. SS&C Blue Prism

Find out what your peers are saying about Pillir vs. SS&C Blue Prism and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Pillir vs. SS&C Blue Prism report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.