Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Perception Point Advanced Email Security vs TitanHQ WebTitan comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Perception Point Advanced Email Security enhances protection, cuts false positives, and reduces workload, providing efficient, cost-effective email threat management.
Sentiment score
7.2
TitanHQ WebTitan saves costs, enhances productivity, and offers broad protection, making it a valuable investment despite its expense.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Perception Point offers efficient, professional 24/7 email security support, praised for prompt, knowledgeable service and high customer engagement.
Sentiment score
8.0
TitanHQ WebTitan support is praised for responsiveness and effectiveness, though improvements in ticketing and communication protocols are suggested.
Customer service and support are good, but there is room for improvement in response time.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Perception Point Advanced Email Security excels in scalable, cloud-based infrastructure, ensuring seamless adaptability and performance for growing businesses.
Sentiment score
7.1
TitanHQ WebTitan efficiently supports scalability, accommodating cloud and on-site deployments with easy resource adjustments for varying user sizes.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Perception Point Advanced Email Security is highly stable and reliable, with minimal downtime and strong user satisfaction in performance.
Sentiment score
7.3
TitanHQ WebTitan is highly stable and reliable, with minimal downtime and effective support resolving rare DNS issues.
I don't bother contacting support when there are downtimes and technical issues.
 

Room For Improvement

Perception Point needs improved threat detection, user interface, and integration with added DLP, phishing protection, and security training features.
TitanHQ WebTitan faces login bugs, antivirus issues, deployment challenges, and users seek better customization, support, and Azure AD integration.
Integration and end-user interaction can be improved as the current system does not allow end-users to send back information to the platform, unlike Google Workspace or competitive tools like Ironscales.
Maybe a couple of improvements on their portal would be good.
The technology employed by TitanHQ doesn't learn enough and is still on the basic side.
 

Setup Cost

Perception Point Advanced Email Security provides fair pricing, flexible configurations, and value, suitable for diverse budgets and strategic ROI.
Enterprise users find TitanHQ WebTitan competitively priced, offering budget-friendly plans and high satisfaction despite potential additional costs.
The pricing of TitanHQ is more or less similar to other tools.
 

Valuable Features

Perception Point offers advanced email security with robust threat detection, user-friendly interface, and efficient scanning without MX changes.
WebTitan by TitanHQ is user-friendly and cost-effective, offering robust web filtering, easy setup, scalability, and strong integration features.
I get weekly reporting, and by doing that, I can go and talk to these people directly and make them aware of how many attacks they had and where the attacks are coming from and not only the source of the email, but what category of emails that they are receiving.
Perception Point Advanced Email Security has a correct price point and offers very good email filtering capabilities.
Two links embedded in the email footer indicating whether the email was spam or not.
 

Categories and Ranking

Perception Point Advanced E...
Ranking in Internet Security
8th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (15th)
TitanHQ WebTitan
Ranking in Internet Security
10th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (24th), Web Content Filtering (4th), Domain Name System (DNS) Security (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Internet Security category, the mindshare of Perception Point Advanced Email Security is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TitanHQ WebTitan is 2.3%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Internet Security
 

Featured Reviews

Fabio Amorim Araujo - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good detection and response capabilities
The solution is very easy to use. We don't have any difficulty with transactions. Finding information, customizing configurations, and getting support or documentation is simple. I don't have any negative points to mention. I would recommend this solution to others. On a scale of one to ten, I'd give it a ten. It's amazing for us—the protection, the analysis time compared to Microsoft 365, and the pricing are all good. We're using both solutions—spam and protection channels. Recently, we presented two-week results to a customer, and they liked them and wanted to buy the solution. Our feedback is positive. We're developing a strategy to increase sales of the solution. When we deliver executive summaries to customers, we present good news about our company and discuss how Perception Point Advanced Email Security can help improve their security.
Pusa Alexandru-Catalin - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides basic email protection features but needs improvement in learning capabilities
TitanHQ does a middle-of-the-road job like Bitdefender and SensorNet, and it has a learning feature, though it's not as advanced as previous technology. In the past, I used a far superior product with no false alarms and minimum spam. This tool learned quickly from my inbox, offering simple yet useful features, such as two links embedded in the email footer indicating whether the email was spam or not.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Internet Security solutions are best for your needs.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Retailer
5%
Computer Software Company
20%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Perception Point Advanced Email Security?
The most valuable feature is the technical support services.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perception Point Advanced Email Security?
In Brazil, the dollar price affects the cost. Perception Point Advanced Email Security is about 50 percent less expensive.
What needs improvement with Perception Point Advanced Email Security?
There are always places for improvement, but this needs deeper thought and planning. Integration and end-user interaction can be improved as the current system does not allow end-users to send back...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TitanHQ WebTitan?
The pricing of TitanHQ is more or less similar to other tools. I would be willing to pay more for a better service.
What needs improvement with TitanHQ WebTitan?
The technology employed by TitanHQ doesn't learn enough and is still on the basic side. I had previously used 'only my email' service, which had superior features, went bankrupt due to technical is...
What is your primary use case for TitanHQ WebTitan?
I mainly use TitanHQ for email protection, specifically for no false alarms and minimal spam.
 

Also Known As

No data available
WebTitan, WebTitan Web Filter
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Clarks, Pepsi, Purple, Comcast, Virgin, McDonalds, Sprint, Adtran, Xirrus, Eir, ViaSat
Find out what your peers are saying about Perception Point Advanced Email Security vs. TitanHQ WebTitan and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.