We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and vCenter Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable product."
"The robotic process automation has increased the confidence of business users."
"There is a feature to accelerate the development so that business analysts can directly create their user stories and assign the task to the developers."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the various workflows."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The solution offers excellent workflows."
"While Pega technical support is okay, it also depends on the issues you need help with and who your contact is with Pega."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its good automation features."
"We can manage and relocate resources easily."
"The most valuable feature is how easy it makes it to manage the VM."
"The storage motion is a good feature. It is a very good tool."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"vCenter Orchestrator is very reliable and stable."
"The most crucial feature of vCenter is its scalability. We can use it to expand our network, so we don't have to report our client devices. The network configuration features are also helpful because we can migrate entire networks."
"The solution is stable."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
"They need to support the solution better, at this time the company does not have enough support."
"What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works."
"Pega's technical support could be better."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities."
"Pega BPM could improve the UI, it is poorly designed to have a good UX experience."
"The training aspect of Pega BPM requires significant enhancement. There should be more opportunities for third-party training and engaging events, such as hackathons where individuals can share their expertise. Additionally, the training structure itself should be more organized, as I have received feedback from my colleagues in the COE that the current training approach is overwhelming and requires excessive referencing to obtain accurate information. Another area for improvement would be the user experience with regard to RPA. Simplifying the IDA for citizen developers would make it easier for them to adopt the RPA tool."
"I believe vCenter Orchestrator should be part of VMware vSphere's basic bundle. As a product, vCenter Orchestrator should not be licensed at all because the world has progressed way beyond what it can offer."
"I would like to see, from within the Web Console, being able to define the project and custom templates per user; almost like how CloudSpec has approached the solution."
"This is an expensive solution."
"I would like to see a greater ability to do mobile administration."
"This solution needs to have more built-in workflows."
"Many times, customers' licenses are not used because the client is not aware of the features and the product benefits. When somebody is buying a product, they just do a default configuration."
"We encounter challenges related to the renewal of support subscriptions."
"A feature to review and setup tasks should be added."
Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Process Automation with 55 reviews while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Process Automation with 44 reviews. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Enables us to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director, Cisco UCS Director and ServiceNow Orchestration. See our Pega BPM vs. vCenter Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
