In the competitive market of API testing and functional testing tools, ReadyAPI Test and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers cater to distinct user bases focused on API and developer testing, respectively. ReadyAPI Test seems to have an upper hand in API functional testing due to its versatility and ease of setup, while OpenText offers significant advantages for developer-oriented testing environments.
Features: ReadyAPI Test is highly regarded for its ability to handle SOAP, REST, and JDBC protocols effectively. It focuses on assertions and automated integration, making it ideal for thorough API functional testing. Users benefit from Groovy scripting and the capability to link web services seamlessly. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers emphasizes support for multiple programming languages, integration with prominent IDEs like Eclipse and Visual Studio, and is particularly beneficial for those incorporating developer testing early in the lifecycle.
Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test might enhance integration capabilities, stability, and the comprehensiveness of its support documentation. There is also feedback suggesting more flexible licensing options and enhanced reporting visualization. OpenText Functional Testing could improve its browser support, integration with CI/CD pipelines, and object recognition capabilities. Enhancing licensing flexibility and offering competitive pricing are also recommended.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test is typically deployed on-premises but is known for faster support and knowledge-rich forums, though it can still improve. OpenText provides both on-premises and cloud deployments with slightly more flexibility. Its prompt and informed support is generally appreciated, yet some concerns exist about clarity and consistency in integration support.
Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test's licenses are considered costly, with concerns about increasing prices over time. Despite the expense, it offers good ROI by boosting automation capabilities. OpenText is also noted for high-cost licenses, especially with floating licenses limiting scalability. Nevertheless, it remains competitive due to its support for a broad range of technologies and visible ROI through efficient automated testing and reduced maintenance costs.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.9% |
| ReadyAPI Test | 0.9% |
| Other | 96.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
