ReadyAPI Test and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers compete in the API testing tools category. ReadyAPI Test appears to have the upper hand with its capabilities for API testing and customizations, while OpenText excels in developer team integration.
Features: ReadyAPI Test offers robust API mocking, functional testing, and load testing. Its flexibility and comprehensive test suite enhance test quality with support for SOAP, REST, JDBC, and Groovy scripting. OpenText Functional Testing provides strong integration with Java and C# programming environments, supports multiple technologies, and is compatible with various development IDEs.
Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test can improve its outdated interface, memory consumption, and support response time. Users desire better integration with test management systems and improved automation capabilities. OpenText Functional Testing should focus on stability, object recognition, and pricing, with suggestions for better CI/CD integration and broader application compatibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products have primarily on-premises deployment, though OpenText offers some cloud-based flexibility. ReadyAPI reports slow support, whereas OpenText is noted for quick customer service and helpful documentation. OpenText's wider deployment options and fast response time give it an edge.
Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test is costly, but users recognize its comprehensive feature set. OpenText also has high licensing fees but includes advantageous floating licenses. Both tools offer significant ROI, with OpenText potentially providing more value in developer-focused environments due to its integration capabilities.
Initially, it was quite poor, but it seems they are making efforts to improve.
For technical support, I would give them an eight because whenever we have a concern, they immediately reach out to us.
We regularly update the product, and overall, it is stable.
In some cases, object recognition is not 100%, and a customized solution is necessary.
The price of OpenText UFT Developer is a bit higher than expected, but there are no better tools available for a valid comparison.
OpenText UFT Developer is user-friendly and integrates well with Visual Studio.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 3.1% |
| ReadyAPI Test | 1.6% |
| Other | 95.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
