No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) vs Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Data Privacy and P...
Ranking in Data Masking
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Encryption (10th)
Protegrity’s Data Protectio...
Ranking in Data Masking
5th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Database Security (10th), Data Governance (32nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Data Masking category, the mindshare of OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) is 6.3%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform is 6.6%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Masking Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage)6.3%
Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform6.6%
Other87.1%
Data Masking
 

Featured Reviews

SasmitHota - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Architect at MindTree
Easy configuration, high availability, and excellent support
Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise can improve the types of encryptions. They are limited by the number of types of encryption and types of masking they are allowing. In the solution that we were using, the illustration interface and the number of capabilities in terms of data masking were limited. They did not have any database masking capabilities or masking capabilities for unstructured data.
Vinoth Raj Prabhakaran - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Data Architect at Tata Consultancy Services
Beneficial data security, good support, and straightforward initial setup
The initial setup of Protegrity Data Security was straightforward. However, we had a few problems, it's not multi-tenanted. It does not have a hierarchy of roles and differential priorities. To have the initial sandbox version of Protegrity Data Security up and running, took approximately one week. However, it needed to be set up in a resilient way because if it fails, then it is going to be a challenge bringing back the lost information. We have to be particular in terms of architecting it correctly which is taking us a bit of time. We are anticipating anywhere between four to six weeks to be finished.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Those wanting to purchase the solution I would advise not being scared about the price."
"The number one feature I found was that the install was really easy, it was quite helpful."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise is the ease of configuration and the group services rest API."
"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise is the ease of configuration and the group services REST API."
"Its technical support team is helpful."
"The most valuable feature of Protegrity Data Security is the reduction of information being exposed."
"The product is stable."
"The solution’s pricing is moderate."
"The most valuable feature of Protegrity Data Security is the reduction of information being exposed."
 

Cons

"Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise can improve the types of encryptions. They are limited by the number of types of encryption and types of masking they are allowing. In the solution that we were using, the illustration interface and the number of capabilities in terms of data masking were limited."
"For a future release, the interface looks a bit dated and could be improved."
"Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise can improve the types of encryptions. They are limited by the number of types of encryption and types of masking they are allowing."
"For a future release, the interface looks a bit dated and could be improved."
"Protegrity is using a different OS which has some bugs. Sometimes it's causing an initialization error."
"The solution's UI could be better."
"Protegrity Data Security could improve by having more integration."
"Protegrity Data Security could improve by having more integration."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I found some of their licensing is a bit complex. I am also finding that some of their cloud solutions are quite expensive."
"We pay for a few additional services apart from its licenses."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Masking solutions are best for your needs.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Construction Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Wholesaler/Distributor
8%
Financial Services Firm
35%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Voltage SecureData Enterprise, Micro Focus SecureData, Voltage, SecureData, Voltage SecureData
Protegrity Data Security
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Epicor, Allegiant Travel Company, EnvisionRxOptions
A $4 billion retail conglomerate and holding company
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Data Privacy and Protection Foundation (Voltage) vs. Protegrity’s Data Protection Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.