OpenText AccuRev vs Planview AgilePlace comparison

OpenText and Planview are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #22, while Planview is ranked #18. OpenText holds a 1.1% mindshare in ALM, compared to Planview’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Planview users who would recommend it.

OpenText AccuRev

Read 8 OpenText AccuRev reviews

1,051 Views
1,051 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview AgilePlace

Read 11 Planview AgilePlace reviews

1,918 Views
1,669 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText AccuRev

Planview AgilePlace

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText AccuRev and Planview AgilePlace are competing in the software development and project management space. Planview AgilePlace appears to have an advantage due to its comprehensive features, while OpenText AccuRev offers more attractive pricing and support options.

Features: OpenText AccuRev provides robust version control, process automation, and excellent software configuration management. Its strength lies in managing multiple code streams effectively. Planview AgilePlace excels in visual project management, offering agile boards and robust collaboration tools. Its high visibility into project status makes it versatile for agile teams.

Room for Improvement: OpenText AccuRev could enhance user interface simplicity, integration with third-party tools, and cloud-based functionalities. Planview AgilePlace might benefit from better reporting capabilities, customization options for reports, and streamlined navigation for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText AccuRev offers a traditional deployment model favored by teams focused on lifecycle management, supported by reliable customer service. Planview AgilePlace provides a flexible cloud-based deployment, ideal for teams prioritizing quick implementation and scalability, and is supported by responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText AccuRev has a lower initial cost, suited for cost-conscious teams, although its ROI is limited by development-focused features. Planview AgilePlace, while potentially more expensive, offers a stronger ROI with its broad functionality and adaptability, appealing to organizations seeking long-term efficiency and growth.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText AccuRev vs. Planview AgilePlace Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev vs. Planview AgilePlace

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,588 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText AccuRev

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview AgilePlace

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText AccuRev is 1.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview AgilePlace is 1.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Planview AgilePlace	1.9%
OpenText AccuRev	1.1%
Other	97.0%

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Sameh-Hablas

CEO - Director General & Founder Ai/ IT Expert - Digital Transformation at Al Danah Information Systems Solutions

Helps us with our compliance goals, native quality management systems and with the legacy systems in our organization

To improve the product, it needs some enhancement to the application's interface to be more user-friendly. The product has all the features that we need and we can depend upon it. My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual. That is my point. It is not very friendly to use. For example, we may need the application to be more friendly in other sorts of ways. If we have an integrated module that allows access to the features we want through one click, you do not need to make it two or three clicks on the screen. The interface can be better designed to easily provide access to the features you need. The feature I would like to see in the next release is just for it to be more friendly to use and to be like a smart application that intuits your movement through the application. It needs to be something that works smoothly and intelligent without any complicated navigation of screens.

Read full review

it_user1684173

PM Systems Analyst at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Simple and intuitive, useful for agile management, and helpful for planning based on our capacity and meeting our deadlines

Every feature is valuable. LeanKit is a Kanban-based tool where you have a visual interface that you can use to create various cards and to create boards to house those cards. You can create a board for managing project work. You can create a board to do PI planning. It is pretty close to the agile way of doing business. The Board Layout Editor is excellent in terms of flexibility. They have been improving its usability. Their development is very much agile, so for any feedback that we give them, they let us know if and when they would act on our request for enhancements or change, and then they make those changes. They are responsive.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is taking snapshots while doing the execution of the test cases."

"The solution is very scalable and it's been quite scalable for our organization's purpose."

"Customer Service: Excellent. Our original pre-sales technical contact is now in a different position within the sales organization, but is still willing to field questions, and get the right resources involved to speed up the delivery of customer service."

"The solution is 100% scalable. It's much more scalable than the customer's capacity for implementing it. We do plan to increase usage ourselves."

"We have seen a bonified return on investment."

"Easy to use on Window platform."

"The most valuable feature is the Business Process Testing feature, BPT, because it brings in the most revenue."

"It has a user friendly UI which has been very much appreciated by our organization."

More OpenText AccuRev pros

"LeanKit has also reduced our cycle times."

"Using the tool seems to save time versus trying to do things in a regular manner; it is highly collaborative, everybody can see things in one place, and it is a highly functional but pretty simple tool, which is hard to find in a tool that has a lot of functions but is also simple."

"We have really benefited from it from the delivery perspective as well as from the perspective of planning the work."

"People found the ability to set up different lanes and the ability to see where they're within the progress most valuable. They can use different colored cards or sticky notes, and then they can separate out which cards belong to a department or the initiative they're working on. They can filter who's working on it, and I've got good feedback about that."

"The "Blocking" feature has helped our scrum masters track impediments and share them at the program level to stakeholders with accountability and detail so that they understand and the action items which can be noted easily."

"Every feature is valuable. LeanKit is a Kanban-based tool where you have a visual interface that you can use to create various cards and to create boards to house those cards. You can create a board for managing project work. You can create a board to do PI planning. It is pretty close to the agile way of doing business."

"LeanKit is amazing when it comes to getting answers about a given card's status. That's one of the biggest takeaways that we've had. The status is right there on the board. Everybody can see it. You just click on it and it gives you everything that you need to know, especially the comments feature because it gives us a timeline of updates. We use that a lot where we write a comment on the card and then we can see and track progress as we move it across the board."

"The usability of it and the readability of it is so much better than what JIRA is."

More Planview AgilePlace pros

Cons

"Limited reporting features for management."

"What I'm missing from the solution is a repository for the code. Something like Git, for example. Some sort of depository for the code that is embedded."

"In the next release, I would like to have a repository for the code which is embedded. Apart from that, it has everything I need."

"Source code conflicts are like evil twins."

"My issue with the product is that it is not easy to use without a guide or a proper manual."

"Stability needs improvement. It has some minor defects that could be improved."

"The tool has an issue whereby it restarts its services on its own."

"The pricing should be more competitive."

More OpenText AccuRev cons

"The first one is that Instant Coffee does not save your work very well in terms of saving it in formats that you can then go back and edit as Visio would."

"I do not know what it can do in the area of scrum. Maybe it has that functionality. I have never tried to set it up. You think of LeanKit from the perspective of Kanban. I don't know if there is a template for scrum, a scaled agile framework, or any of those scaling frameworks."

"Being able to track actual time on cards or sprints, instead of using just the planned start and stop date, would also be useful. I would like to see something like JIRA has with actual sprint starts and stops."

"Our overall impression of Leankit has been very positive, however, our experience with the JIRA integration into our Leankit boards was much harder than we anticipated and that could be improved by simplifying it somehow."

"They have a feature called Instant Coffee. It was in the beta phase. They released it from beta, and now, it is a legit thing. We were in the pilot here. I liked the idea of Instant Coffee, and I like how it is integrated, to some degree, with LeanKit, but I have two big rocks to throw at them on this. The first one is that Instant Coffee does not save your work very well in terms of saving it in formats that you can then go back and edit as Visio would. It leads to the next point, which is, we're not really clear on what they're trying to do with Instant Coffee. I feel that they're trying not to reinvent Visio, Miro, and other software programs out there that do mapping, visual diagrams, etc. Miro is fantastic in that regard. I gather they're not trying to reinvent Miro, but it sure would be nice if it had more aspects of Miro in it, such as being able to draw arrows and write on them on the top."

"The biggest improvement would be the API and data connections and making the data more accessible or quicker to access. One of our team members has brought up actual-time tracking on a card as a potential improvement. They had an interest in knowing how long a specific card had been worked on by a specific user or somebody that was assigned to that card. But there's not really a way for them to start and stop a time that they were actually working on it, except for if we created a different lane and they dragged it into the lane and then stopped using it in the lane."

"We are a 750-employee company, so we got lucky that our board approved the kind of funding we needed for the solution. But, LeanKit probably needs to reduce its pricing."

"Within the current features, if they can give some ability to show more icons on the card, it would be helpful. It would help us in showing more data on the cards."

More Planview AgilePlace cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is a lower cost than other top competetors."

"As far as I understand, it is not an expensive application."

"I don't believe there are any costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"In general, Planview's cost structure is reasonable. You get quite a lot of functionality for the license cost that you get."

"I don't know what it would be on its own. It was basically included with what we were already paying or using. So, it was a no-brainer. It wasn't like we had to sell the company on making a purchase or anything like that. There weren't any costs that came in after implementing it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,588 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Insurance Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 22% of the time

TFS vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 20% of the time

GoCD vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 10% of the time

Digital.ai Agility vs OpenText AccuRev

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText AccuRev Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 16% of the time

Jira Align vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 16% of the time

Rally Software vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 8% of the time

Polarion ALM vs Planview AgilePlace

Compared 6% of the time

More Planview AgilePlace Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev

June 2026

Download OpenText AccuRev product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview AgilePlace

June 2026

Download Planview AgilePlace product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus AccuRev, AccuRev

Planview LeanKit, LeanKit

Overview

OpenText AccuRev offers a robust and reliable approach to software configuration management, making it an essential tool for teams who prioritize efficient and detailed version control.

OpenText AccuRev stands out due to its stream-based architecture, helping teams manage complex codebases seamlessly. It supports parallel development, facilitating the streamlined management of simultaneous projects. Its scalability ensures seamless adaptation to changing team sizes and project demands.

What are the key features of OpenText AccuRev?

Stream-based architecture: Enables efficient management of branching and merging.
Parallel development: Supports multiple code paths for concurrent project work.
Scalability: Adapts to team size and project complexity effortlessly.
Time-based visualizations: Enhances understanding of project history and changes.
Enterprise-level security: Ensures safe and secure data handling practices.

What benefits should users evaluate in OpenText AccuRev?

Improved team collaboration: Facilitates smooth workflows among development teams.
Increased efficiency: Streamlines processes and reduces manual overhead.
Enhanced control: Offers precise management over project changes and iterations.
Cost savings: Reduces resources needed for managing complex projects.

OpenText AccuRev is implemented across industries like software development, finance, and telecommunications to manage large-scale applications. Its adaptability has made it a go-to option where change management and version control are critical for project success.

OpenText

Planview AgilePlace provides an intuitive platform for managing and visualizing work, supporting task tracking, Kanban boards, and agile management while enhancing collaboration and transparency.

Planview AgilePlace is a tool for tracking and optimizing team workflows through visual boards and advanced features like swim lanes and lean methodologies. It integrates with Power BI, facilitates strategic planning through its card status updates and Scrum integration, and improves project prioritization with resource management and financial tracking. It stands out due to its intuitive design and ease of use. While effective, the platform could enhance integration with Enterprise One and JIRA, improve customization, and offer better time-tracking functionalities. Enhanced reporting, dashboard capabilities, and API access are also anticipated upgrades. Users desire further enhancements in AgilePlace's recurring card functionalities and industry-specific agile project management features.

What are the key features of Planview AgilePlace?

Customizable Kanban Boards: Design boards with swim lanes and dependencies for efficient task management.
Visible Work Tracking: Improve transparency with clear visual workflows and defined card status.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless connectivity with tools like Power BI for improved data analysis.
Efficient Reporting: Generate comprehensive reports to support strategic decisions.
LeanKit's Interface: Navigate tasks easily with an intuitive layout and agile features.

What benefits should users look for in Planview AgilePlace reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Foster teamwork through shared visual management tools.
Strategic Planning: Utilize Scrum integration and resource management for effective planning.
Improved Task Management: Streamline workflows with tailored Kanban boards and visible progress tracking.
Enterprise-wide Integration: Connect with systems like JIRA for comprehensive project oversight.
Usability and Visibility: Benefit from an intuitive platform that simplifies project tracking and execution.

Planview AgilePlace finds application in industries requiring agile management and task visualization, such as technology and finance. It supports project management from initial requests to closure, aligning team priorities and enhancing workflow management. Teams leverage its capabilities for planning, resource allocation, and capital project tracking, integrating seamlessly with enterprise systems to deliver outcomes efficiently.

Planview

Sample Customers

Akcelerant, SDL, CSG, Avid Technology Inc., Azimuth Systems Inc, Drivecam, Endgame, f5 Networks, Follett Software, Hyland Software, Indanet, Kronos, McAfee

REA Group, Thompson Reuters

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AccuRev vs. Planview AgilePlace

June 2026

Free Report: OpenText AccuRev vs. Planview AgilePlace

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText AccuRev vs. Planview AgilePlace and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,588 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText AccuRev vs. Planview AgilePlace report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.