We performed a comparison between OpenShift and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in PaaS Clouds."The security features of OpenShift are strong when in use of role-based access."
"The most valuable feature of OpenShift is the security context constraint (SCC). The solution’s security throughout the stack is good. And security context constraints provide port-level security. It's a granular level of control, where you can give privileges to certain users to work on certain applications."
"The initial setup is simple, and OpenShift is open-source, so it's easy to install on any cloud platform."
"This solution is providing a platform with OOTB features that are difficult to build from scratch."
"Provides support throughout the whole platform."
"The solution provides a lot of flexibility to the application team for running their applications in the container platform, without needing to monitor the entire infrastructure all the time. It automatically scales and automatically self-heals. There is also a mechanism to alert the team in case it is over-committing or overutilizing the application."
"Great integration with Jenkins for constant integration and development. Supports all the major languages and environments - PHP, Java, Node.js, Ruby, etc."
"OpenShift offers more stability than Kubernetes."
"The simple infrastructure of the service is very useful."
"I have found Oracle Cloud to be a scalable solution."
"The technical support is good, they have been responsive and helpful."
"The pricing of the solution is pretty good."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Cloud is the digital assistant."
"The performance and processing capability are excellent."
"The stability of the solution is very good...The technical support is good."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"I think that OpenShift has too many commands for running services from the CLI, and the configuration files are a little complicated."
"The solution needs to support the new features in Kubernetes more quickly."
"One glaring flaw is how OpenShift handles operators. Sometimes operators are forced to go into a particular namespace. When you do that, OpenShift creates an installation plan for everything in that namespace. These operators may be completely separate from each other and have nothing to do with each other, but now they are tied at the hip. You can't upgrade one without upgrading all of them. That's a huge mistake and highly problematic."
"OpenShift can improve monitoring. Sometimes there are issues. Additionally, the solution could benefit from protective tools if something was to happen in our network."
"There have been some issues with security, in particular, that we had to address. At times they make it “clunky." I am quite confident these parameters will appear in the next releases. They have been reported as bugs and are actually in process."
"The product’s integration with Windows containers and other third-party products needs improvement."
"It could use auto-scaling based on criteria such as transaction volume, queue backlog, etc. Currently, it is limited to CPU and memory."
"We experienced issues around desktop security, that stopped us implementing a new feature that had been developed."
"Oracle Cloud could be improved with better third-party integrations."
"There is room for improvement for stability."
"The solution could always be less expensive."
"The solution needs to improve the discovery and assessment of the existing infrastructure."
"The customization and the requests put through were not flexible enough."
"The solution’s support could be improved."
"There should be more management automation."
"The solution should integrate better with other tools and different vendors."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenShift is ranked 4th in PaaS Clouds with 53 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 3rd in PaaS Clouds with 91 reviews. OpenShift is rated 8.4, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of OpenShift writes "Provides us with the flexibility and efficiency of cloud-native stacks while enabling us to meet regulatory constraints". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". OpenShift is most compared with Amazon AWS, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud and VMware Tanzu Application Service, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Public Cloud and Alibaba Cloud.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.