Onna vs Ravel Law comparison

Onna and Ravel Law are both solutions in the AI for Legal Affairs category. Onna is ranked #19, while Ravel Law is ranked #18. Onna holds a 1.1% mindshare in AILA, compared to Ravel Law’s 1.0% mindshare.

Onna

91 Views
91 Comparison Views

Ravel Law

94 Views
94 Comparison Views

Onna

Ravel Law

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Onna

Ranking in AI for Legal Affairs

19th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ravel Law

Ranking in AI for Legal Affairs

18th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the AI for Legal Affairs category, the mindshare of Onna is 1.1%. The mindshare of Ravel Law is 1.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

AI for Legal Affairs Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ravel Law	1.0%
Onna	1.1%
Other	97.9%

AI for Legal Affairs

Comparisons

No data available

LawGeex vs Ravel Law

Compared 100% of the time

More Ravel Law Competitors

Overview

Onna is a data integration software that connects to new media platforms, such as Slack, JIRA, and Confluence, to help in-house legal departments with eDiscovery, legal holds, and risk management. Onna lets organizations collect, preserve, search, and centralize their scattered data silos in one single repository.

Onna

Information not available

Ravel Law

Sample Customers

Facebook, EA, CDK Global, TransPerfect

Information Not Available

See our list of best AI for Legal Affairs vendors.

We monitor all AI for Legal Affairs reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.