OmniPeek vs SCOM comparison

BlueCat and Microsoft are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. BlueCat is ranked #45 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. BlueCat holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Microsoft’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlueCat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

OmniPeek

Read 8 OmniPeek reviews

2,952 Views
1,771 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SCOM

Read 83 SCOM reviews

8,966 Views
6,007 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

OmniPeek

SCOM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

SCOM and OmniPeek are competing in the network management and monitoring category. While each has unique strengths, OmniPeek may have an edge due to its advanced real-time packet analysis capabilities, which appeal to tech buyers focused on specific network insights.

Features: SCOM provides comprehensive network health monitoring, integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, and robust reporting tools. OmniPeek is recognized for its granular packet analysis, real-time network diagnostics, and wireless support.

Room for Improvement: SCOM could enhance its initial deployment complexity, integrate more third-party tools, and simplify user interface design. OmniPeek might expand support for larger enterprise environments, improve its integration with non-wireless networks, and provide a more intuitive user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OmniPeek offers a straightforward deployment model and responsive customer support. SCOM requires extensive configuration within Microsoft's ecosystem but benefits from Microsoft's established support infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: SCOM's setup costs can be an initial barrier but deliver strong ROI through integration in Microsoft environments. OmniPeek has more economical entry pricing focused on packet-level insights and provides value with lower upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed OmniPeek vs. SCOM Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OmniPeek vs. SCOM

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OmniPeek

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (38th)

SCOM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

14th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of OmniPeek is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SCOM is 1.5%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SCOM	1.5%
OmniPeek	0.6%
Other	97.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AjayKumar19

Senior Software Engineer at Microchip Technology Inc.

Helps analyze network packets effectively and saves time for testers

I have utilized the packet capturing capabilities in OmniPeek. Using the Alpha sniffer and hardware-supported network devices, we can perform sniffer capturing for Wi-Fi wireless packets and router packets. The interface allows us to capture packets and observe connection establishment, data transfer, and the downloading and uploading of packets, such as TCP and UDP packets. The software works for both wireless and wired connections, including Ethernet. As a wireless test engineer in the wireless industry, the features of OmniPeek help me monitor network activity. While there are alternatives such as Wireshark, OmniPeek supports Windows and is particularly helpful for testers, especially for device certification validation. This software enables packet analysis to verify protocol compliance and identify issues. For developers, packet captures from OmniPeek assist in understanding and debugging issues.

Read full review

Akshita Kukreja

Assistant Manager at SMS group GmbH

Have integrated effective monitoring and seamless alerting with improved visualization capabilities

The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool. We have implemented and integrated this to create dashboarding of the SCOM monitoring system for the database, SQL, and the Linux servers we have configured in SCOM. We have created separate dashboarding for it, and the monitoring and creating rules and monitors in the management servers and management packs that SCOM provides are very useful for us. The alerting mechanism of SCOM has benefited our operations because we have modified the thresholds as per our internal requirements. We have configured threshold modifications for the CPU, memory, and especially for disk space. For routine disk space usage on the system, we have provided a separate threshold configuration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek was the ability it gave us to see the connection procedure."

"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek is the ability to assign custom color codes to the different packets easily."

"The most valuable features are the voice bot, which checks the quality of service for voice, and the expert view that gives me insight on what and where to troubleshoot."

"The most valuable feature is OmniPeek is user-friendly."

"OmniPeek shows the entire packet flow and structure, particularly in security-related scenarios, whereas Wireshark sometimes fails to capture all packets."

"OmniPeek's ability to convert application visibility into flow helps me quickly understand application performance over LAN, WAN, or wireless."

"The most valuable feature of OmniPeek was the ability it gave us to see the connection procedure."

More OmniPeek pros

"This solution allows us to standardize all of the reports for monitoring the network, so it helps a lot for auditing purposes."

"It works better than other products I’ve used – namely SolarWinds, which is cumbersome and error prone for web app monitoring. SCOM is not."

"The advantages of SCOM are that it is definitely user friendly and a more appropriate solution for what we need."

"It discovers the components automatically, which is a fantastic thing. The discovery works in an automatic way, and it has a dynamic way of discovering the components, assets, and applications. It doesn't require any manual intervention."

"The System Center 2012 R2 is really powerful, all products work great together, is not so expensive anymore, easy to license, and can cover from end to end (Networking, Hardware layer, OS, App and services, ports, etc.)."

"The good reporting capabilities was one of the major functions which made us choose SCOM as the tool for handling MS application operations (only used for that, not the OS platforms)."

"Being able to make and customize management packs and send out notifications is very valuable."

"IT management experienced a big improvement after implementation of this product."

More SCOM pros

Cons

"OmniPeek needs to improve its performance level."

"The solution's automation has room for improvement."

"I am not using OmniPeek for automation, we only do manual testing. Automation testing is tedious to do."

"I don't see a clear roadmap in the future for improving this software."

"I would like to see the saving feature improved. We have had issues if you do not save your progress then you have to start from the beginning."

"Making it more clear on how to configure the filters, or really automating them, would be an improvement."

"Sometimes setting up the filters for the product is difficult, and I can't quickly sharpen them from the home screen."

"I would like to see the saving feature improved. We have had issues if you do not save your progress then you have to start from the beginning."

More OmniPeek cons

"The console feature is very poor, and it would be very good for us if this were improved."

"The dashboard features are not user-friendly for our management team, only for the technical department."

"Overall, I find that this is a good solution but the presentation layer is really bad."

"I would like to see better support for monitoring Unix-based systems."

"I feel that the stability of the tool has room for improvement and I would like to see that in the next version."

"There are some negative points about this product. Sometimes, the capabilities of the software don't appear, and you can't directly see the results."

"The initial setup should be easier to complete."

"The dashboard is still not so great and, most of the time, a third-party tool is required for presentation."

More SCOM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for this solution could be improved, as it is a very expensive product."

"There are different types of licenses available."

"We have only purchased the add-on once and have not paid for any subsequent versions as it was too costly for us."

"The pricing and licensing are fair."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is paid annually."

"We have an EA with Microsoft, and it comes as part of the EA."

"If you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, then this is part of the agreement."

"It is more expensive than the competition."

"The platform is cost-effective due to our existing Microsoft support."

"Two customers bought the enterprise agreement with Microsoft and paid for Software Assurance. But few customers don't buy it for Software Assurance. They just buy it and deploy it, and they think that we will be using it for the next five years."

"Our Enterprise Agreement includes the price."

More SCOM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	54

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with OmniPeek?

There isn't anything specific that needs improvement in OmniPeek, as it performs better than Wireshark for our requirements. However, OmniPeek could benefit from supporting different platforms. Pla...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OmniPeek?

I have been working with the OmniPeek product for almost two years at the start of my career, primarily using it for wireless 802.11 Wi-Fi packets, sniffer, and analysis. My experience with OmniPee...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering OmniPeek?

I didn't explore much about OmniPeek beyond its basic features. OmniPeek is user-friendly and easy to start working with, especially on the Windows platform. For beginners, it is very easy to handl...

See all answers

What do you like most about SCOM?

The tool helps to monitor Windows servers. It offers alerts from a central location.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?

I am not aware of the exact pricing as it is managed by my supervisor. As an academic institution, we receive substantial discounts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SCOM?

We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting. We can work on deploying new ways of viewing things and modifying visualizat...

See all answers

Comparisons

TruView vs OmniPeek

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OmniPeek

Compared 6% of the time

Colasoft Capsa vs OmniPeek

Compared 6% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs OmniPeek

Compared 6% of the time

LiveNX vs OmniPeek

Compared 5% of the time

More OmniPeek Competitors

Nagios XI vs SCOM

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs SCOM

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

LogicMonitor vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

More SCOM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OmniPeek

April 2026

Download OmniPeek product report

Buyer's Guide

SCOM

April 2026

Download SCOM product report

Also Known As

Savvius OmniPeek

System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012

Overview

OmniPeek enables effective network monitoring by offering packet capturing capabilities for Wi-Fi and routers, providing insights crucial for maintaining network performance and troubleshooting issues.

OmniPeek serves as a pivotal tool for wireless packet analysis, assisting teams with capturing and analyzing Wi-Fi 802.11 packets across standards. It aids in testing WLAN protocols and provides application performance and security analytics, supporting network issue monitoring, protocol analysis, and troubleshooting both on-premises and cloud applications. Real-time analytics integration with LiveNX and expert view functionalities make it a preferred choice for user-friendly network operation, although improvements in platform support, automation, and guidance are sought by users.

What are OmniPeek's key features?

Packet Capturing: Efficiently captures Wi-Fi and router packets for robust network analysis.
Channel-Based Sniffing: Monitors DFS and non-DFS transitions, vital for network stability.
Real-Time Analytics: Integrates with LiveNX for live data insights.
Custom Color Coding: Enhances packet visibility for easier analysis.
Expert View: Offers in-depth troubleshooting capabilities.

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simple interface enhances usability and efficiency.
Protocol Compliance: Verifies protocols for reliable network operations.
Application Performance Monitoring: Ensures optimal application functionality.
Voice Quality Checks: Maintains high communication standards.

OmniPeek is implemented across sectors that require precise wireless packet analysis. It's crucial for testing WLAN protocols, validating IP blocks, and ensuring network performance during enterprise-level authentications and internet egress, offering organizations user-friendly solutions for comprehensive WLAN monitoring.

BlueCat

SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.

SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.

What are key features of SCOM?

Microsoft Environment Monitoring: Specialized for Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with Active Directory and Azure for streamlined operations.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor visual data displays to enhance monitoring and decision-making.
Extensive Management Packs: Broad range of management packs for enhanced resource and application control.
Robust Alert Mechanisms: Comprehensive alerting to maintain service stability and address potential issues promptly.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced management of server applications and infrastructure.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Detailed insights into performance and service availability.
Proactive Issue Notification: Timely alerts for quick issue resolution.
Improved Control: More efficient server management through automation and visibility.

In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Apcon, Aruba Networks, Avaya Inc., Cisco Systems, Ekahau, Gigamon Systems, HP, IBM, IXIA, Meru Networks, Napatech, NextComputing, Procera Networks, Qualcomm Atheros, Ralink Technology Corporation, Telchemy

Dialog Telekom

Buyer's Guide

OmniPeek vs. SCOM

April 2026

Free Report: OmniPeek vs. SCOM

Find out what your peers are saying about OmniPeek vs. SCOM and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OmniPeek vs. SCOM report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.