No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Okta ISPM vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Okta ISPM
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) (9th)
Ping Identity Platform
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
30
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (6th), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (11th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (5th), Access Management (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Security Software solutions, they serve different purposes. Okta ISPM is designed for Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) and holds a mindshare of 2.4%, up 0.5% compared to last year.
Ping Identity Platform, on the other hand, focuses on Authentication Systems, holds 3.2% mindshare, down 3.6% since last year.
Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Okta ISPM2.4%
Saviynt Identity Cloud26.2%
Veza22.1%
Other49.3%
Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM)
Authentication Systems Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform3.2%
Microsoft Entra ID6.5%
Okta Platform4.8%
Other85.5%
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

Use Okta ISPM?
Leave a review
AmitRathod - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Analyst at Toll Group
Single sign-on has simplified access while adaptive authentication protects complex user journeys
Regarding areas for improvement in Ping Identity Platform, there is not much. In terms of licensing and implementation costs, it has premium pricing, and it has a very complex implementation. It provides greater feasibility, but it takes a very long time in terms of complete building. There is a very limited number of legacy support, which can pose potential difficulties in integrating with certain older or legacy systems. Additionally, issue troubleshooting can be difficult at times. Sometimes issues can be difficult to diagnose and require extensive technical expertise. There is also a very steep learning curve for administrative purposes and potential difficulties with offline authentication scenarios.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) solutions are best for your needs.
892,943 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
22%
Retailer
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingFederate?
The product is affordable and starts at 20,000 dollars/year, depending upon the license and maintenance requirement. It makes our work easier and saves a lot of time.
What do you like most about PingAccess?
PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tool...
What needs improvement with PingAccess?
From the improvement perspective, they could bring IGA capability, which right now they only have in their SaaS offering. Other than that, Ping Identity Platform has multiple products for access ma...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol