We performed a comparison between Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I've been very pleased with their support overall."
"In terms of dealing with our business-critical workloads, Nutanix is a highly scalable, highly resilient, and very high-performing solution."
"The solution can scale well."
"The overall infrastructure is the most valuable part of Nutanix Cloud Clusters."
"The scalability is good."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Clusters is to protect the data."
"The most valuable features of Nutanix Clusters are Prism Central, Micro-segmentation, and cluster scaling automation."
"The most valuable feature is having the full features of my Nutanix on-premises applications in the cloud."
"SAP S4HANA's most valuable features include backup, security, storage, infrastructure, and enabling AI."
"The solution adds great value to any organization."
"The internal integration within departments and integration with third parties is simplified in the system."
"Technical support is very good from SAP and AWS...Scalability is always available in the solution...With a stable environment, it should be running very nicely."
"The tool's installation is easy. I rate it an eight out of ten."
"I like that they are very familiar with our VM which makes it easy to use."
"The solution is scalable."
"We have approximately 1,000 people using the solution in my organization. The solution is scalable."
"There are still some things that could be improved about the product."
"The biggest weakness with Clusters at this point is that the adoption rate is low because customers don't know enough about it."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"Some of the interfaces aren't as intuitive as they should be."
"The technical support for Nutanix Clusters could be better."
"I'd like more flexible options to get in and out of migration modes."
"The pricing can be better."
"We've had some challenges with the implementation."
"The solution is costlier than other products."
"This solution is very resource-intensive, including high memory and CPU utilization."
"The manufacturing application system, it's not as user-friendly in S4HANA."
"The solution needs a warehouse management feature. Right now, there's a built-in WM, but they don't have an EWM extended warehouse management built-in, in S/4HANA. It's a separate product. So if they can add that, that would be great."
"SAP S4HANA on AWS could improve by having the entire solution available as a web solution. They only have Fiori right now, and it's a solution for certain modules, but not for all the modules that SAP currently has. We would like to see the GUI removed, it is not very good. We want it to be web-based."
"I would like for them to have more integration with virtualization platforms."
"The documentation isn't clear enough."
"There are times when the solution can become slower. The stability could improve."
Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is ranked 13th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 9 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is rated 8.6, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) writes "Helps manage costs, eliminates waste, and has excellent technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, Azure Stack, AWS Outposts, VMware Cloud on AWS and Microsoft Azure, whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and Amazon AWS. See our Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
