Nozomi Networks vs Tripwire Industrial Visibility [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."
  • More Nozomi Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features.
    Top Answer:The solution should include an integration library.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    5,199
    Comparisons
    3,500
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    213
    Rating
    9.0
    Unranked
    In Operational Technology (OT) Security
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SCADAguardian
    Learn More
    Fortra
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    In the past, industrial control systems weren’t considered high risk for cyberattacks because they weren’t connected to enterprise systems or the internet.
    Today, the use of common technology platforms, IT/OT data sharing, and cloud-based applications and analytics have made OT and IoT systems a primary target for threat actors. CIOs and CISOs are now expected to protect the entire IT/OT landscape, including all physical assets and industrial processes. To achieve this, OT and IoT security needs to be part of an overall digital security strategy managed by a collaborative IT/OT team.

    MAP YOUR NETWORK
    Machine learning isolates each asset on your network and maps the flow of traffic between them.

    FIX VULNERABILITIES SOONER
    Passive scanning detects CVEs without interrupting operations.

    BLOCK ATTACK VECTORS
    Threat modelling shows you how to protect your most sensitive assets.

    AUTOMATE SECURITY CONTROLS
    Change management and event logging catch deviations from your secure baseline.

    Sample Customers
    Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Energy/Utilities Company42%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    University6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise79%
    Buyer's Guide
    Nozomi Networks vs. Tenable OT Security
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi Networks vs. Tenable OT Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Nozomi Networks is ranked 1st in Operational Technology (OT) Security with 3 reviews while Tripwire Industrial Visibility [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Operational Technology (OT) Security. Nozomi Networks is rated 9.4, while Tripwire Industrial Visibility [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Nozomi Networks writes "Has good security features and can be used for OT visibility". On the other hand, Nozomi Networks is most compared with Claroty Platform, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Forescout Platform and Armis, whereas Tripwire Industrial Visibility [EOL] is most compared with Dragos and Claroty Platform.

    See our list of best Operational Technology (OT) Security vendors.

    We monitor all Operational Technology (OT) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.