No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Armis vs Nozomi Networks comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Armis
Ranking in IoT Security
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (1st), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (1st)
Nozomi Networks
Ranking in IoT Security
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Armis is 12.6%, down from 19.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 13.7%, down from 31.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Armis12.6%
Nozomi Networks13.7%
Other73.7%
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

GA
IDM Consultant at GCA Consultoria de Informática Ltda
Identity management has streamlined user lifecycle and now guarantees first-day access
The best features Armis offers include the interaction with my manager in Brazil, whose first name is Rui, and who provided a lot of experience, especially Horácio, who used to work for Microsoft. Horácio helped with issues related to Active Directory and provided ideas on how to best integrate the solutions. The aspect of Armis solution that stood out to me was its flexibility to integrate different applications. The collaboration of the team is really important and key for the project to go well and bring the results the customer is looking for. The solution has the necessary resources and connectors that have built many of the rules needed for integration, regardless of whether the application is an Active Directory, an LDAP directory, a database, or even a specific solution such as SAP. It is also flexible enough to build the business rules that apply specifically to that customer. Armis has positively impacted my organization and my client's organization by ensuring that on day one, new users had all the access they needed to work for the applications that were integrated. Additionally, if a user was dismissed from the company, they would lose all access to the integrated applications because Active Directory, which was key for user authentication, would disable their account. I do not recall any specific statistics regarding measurable results, but there was positive feedback from managers concerning the process during the time I was there.
Apurva Nigam - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint
Comprehensive dashboards have enabled detailed asset visibility and proactive risk mitigation
On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Networks does not provide that data, so I have to go to the query section. The AI is currently useful for writing queries in English that are converted into their coding language for queries. Sometimes it provides the correct data, and sometimes it does not understand the request. From my attempts, I would say 50 percent of the time it has given me the proper data, and 50 percent of the time it might need improvement. Every day or week, new threat intelligence and AI upgrades are being released for Vantage, and all those upgrades are being implemented. Things are getting better, but I believe there are areas of improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The technology is good."
"It determines which assets and devices are at risk, alerts you if there's a risk, and categorizes all assets, including personal computers, mobile phones, servers, televisions, cars, and video game consoles."
"Armis is very easy to implement due to its agentless design and offers a granular level of visibility for all assets in the network."
"Armis is easy to use."
"Real-time asset monitoring in Armis helps with network operations, especially in comparison to Nozomi."
"The initial setup and deployment were simple."
"Armis saves time by automating asset inventory management, allowing enterprises to quickly strategize by understanding their assets and exposures."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."
"The tool's visibility is good. We can see the traffic flow."
"The feature I like best is its stability."
"Nozomi Networks has the best AI-based detection and intrusion detection solution, as it is very robust, easy to deploy, and easy to use with a very user-friendly GUI and good support in terms of product and after-sales support."
"I chose Nozomi because it is far ahead of other competitors, like Curator and Elastic."
"This is a good product and I definitely recommend it."
"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."
"It has impacted security operations in a better way."
"The network visualization feature of Nozomi impacts security operations positively."
 

Cons

"The OpenText solution we used had to improve its development in relation to cloud environments. They have started to offer a version that works on the cloud, but they are really behind in that aspect today."
"The vulnerability assessment for Windows is not that great. It misses out on a lot of vulnerabilities."
"Armis could improve its geographic spread and marketing campaigns across regions."
"There isn't anything specific that needs improvement."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"Like any IT tool, continuous learning and improvement are essential for the solution."
"There are occasional issues with some built-in integrations that require troubleshooting, particularly with DHCP integration. Developing additional integrations would be beneficial."
"After implementing Armis, an organization experiences it as an add-on. Without asset visibility or vulnerability prioritization, it becomes a useless product."
"I would like more customizable options for configurations."
"Nozomi Networks should improve its pricing."
"Creating custom queries is time-consuming."
"On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved."
"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."
"I believe there is room for improvement regarding on-premises AI."
"We have faced downtimes, crashes, or performance issues with certain implementations."
"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cheap."
"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."
"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
887,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Armis?
AI is one improvement I noted for Armis, and I may have other examples as well.
What is your primary use case for Armis?
I confirm my experience with Armis, and as a cybersecurity specialist, I have several years of experience in this sphere. In terms of AI-driven risk assessments in Armis, I have insights to share b...
What advice do you have for others considering Armis?
I am still dealing with Armis to some extent, as I have not stopped working with it for more than a year. I can confirm that I am also working with other vendors such as Fortinet and various vulner...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks and Claroty are on the expensive end of the market, so the client should have those budgets available.
What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?
On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Netw...
What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?
I am a service provider handling the portal for Nozomi Networks across 35 different sites. I use the dashboard, Vantage, Guardian, and CMC. I have configured everything and use the system as both a...
 

Also Known As

No data available
SCADAguardian
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung Research America, IDT Corporation, Gett
Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis vs. Nozomi Networks and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
887,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.