No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Armis vs Nozomi Networks comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Armis
Ranking in IoT Security
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (1st)
Nozomi Networks
Ranking in IoT Security
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Armis is 11.4%, down from 18.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 12.0%, down from 28.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nozomi Networks12.0%
Armis11.4%
Other76.6%
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead Pre-Sales at M.TECH Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.
Comprehensive visibility has transformed how I secure and prioritize risks across connected devices
The best features Armis offers include vulnerability management for OT and IoT devices, providing risk prioritization, and offering protection across all connected assets. Armis cyber exposure management is very good as it provides continuous visibility, risk prioritization, and protection across all connected assets. Armis has positively impacted my organization by providing asset discovery for both OT and IoT, as well as threat visibility for OT and IoT devices along with vulnerability information, including the CVE number so that I can fix the threat on OT and IoT devices. Most of the time, focus is on IT devices and attention is not paid to OT and IoT. Armis facilitates focus on OT and IoT as well, closing the gap that often exists. Armis makes life easier for customers by providing visibility of OT and IoT, as well as threat visibility. Armis has a user-friendly interface, is very useful for customers, provides quality support, and has a global presence allowing easy access for both customers and Armis representatives. The console is user-friendly. Armis handles compliance requirements in my industry very well and is useful.
Apurva Nigam - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint
Comprehensive dashboards have enabled detailed asset visibility and proactive risk mitigation
On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Networks does not provide that data, so I have to go to the query section. The AI is currently useful for writing queries in English that are converted into their coding language for queries. Sometimes it provides the correct data, and sometimes it does not understand the request. From my attempts, I would say 50 percent of the time it has given me the proper data, and 50 percent of the time it might need improvement. Every day or week, new threat intelligence and AI upgrades are being released for Vantage, and all those upgrades are being implemented. Things are getting better, but I believe there are areas of improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."
"Armis transforms cybersecurity from a cost center into a business performance driver, delivering quantifiable ROI through reduced risk, operational efficiency, and compliance readiness for board-level discussions."
"Armis has reduced the cost of employment because before, I had to take all the logs, and the logs required so many more employees, but currently, one employee is handling everything, saving the cost of four employees."
"Armis has a positive impact by improving enterprise-wide asset visibility, strengthening risk awareness, and helping the security operations team reduce blind spots."
"I find the most valuable features of Armis to be its focus on IT, OT security, and medical device security."
"Armis has positively impacted my organization by helping me identify vulnerabilities more effectively, especially on assets that I did not know existed on the network."
"Real-time asset monitoring in Armis helps with network operations, especially in comparison to Nozomi."
"Armis has positively impacted my organization and my client's organization by ensuring that on day one, new users had all the access they needed to work for the applications that were integrated."
"Nozomi Networks is the easiest to use, with the capability to build really quickly an overview of your infrastructure."
"The feature I like best is its stability."
"Our last customer using Nozomi Networks is very happy with it and appreciates the reports and all features, and they use Nozomi Networks in the SOC where the technical people monitor and see the performance of the OT product and are very satisfied."
"The best feature of Nozomi Networks is that it has built OT-oriented protocols such as OPC UA, DNP3, Modbus, and Siemens S7, and for these protocols, Nozomi Networks identifies them very perfectly."
"The network visualization feature of Nozomi impacts security operations positively."
"Nozomi Networks has positively impacted my organization by allowing me to build a roadmap based on what I see, ultimately leading to a better security posture, which includes knowing what is inside the network and what vulnerabilities exist."
"Nozomi Networks has led to specific outcomes or measurable improvements for my team, including faster response times."
"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."
 

Cons

"We have faced issues with the tool's stability."
"After implementing Armis, an organization experiences it as an add-on. Without asset visibility or vulnerability prioritization, it becomes a useless product."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"In terms of stability, Armis is not completely stable, as sometimes incidents may occur."
"The vulnerability assessment for Windows is not that great. It misses out on a lot of vulnerabilities."
"Like any IT tool, continuous learning and improvement are essential for the solution."
"The OpenText solution we used had to improve its development in relation to cloud environments. They have started to offer a version that works on the cloud, but they are really behind in that aspect today."
"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."
"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."
"I would add that the documentation is lacking some information, so you need to ask customer support for it, but you cannot have everything."
"I see challenges with Nozomi Networks mainly as a detection or visibility tool, but it does not actively block traffic by design for safety reasons."
"On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved."
"The solution should include an integration library."
"Nozomi Networks should improve its pricing."
"Integrating with other security devices is a little difficult because this process is not currently automated."
"The pricing was quite high based on the end customer's perspective."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cheap."
"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."
"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
University
7%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Armis?
For improvement, I suggest adopting more automation and making the solution AI-enabled. If Armis can be autonomous, it will be more useful for customers. If it can respond to threats in real-time, ...
What is your primary use case for Armis?
My main use case is to identify all the devices in my network, connect to them, and identify the exposure alerts for those devices. I only have to discover all the devices, connect to them, and ide...
What advice do you have for others considering Armis?
I advise that if you want cybersecurity, then you can mostly explore this tool. Armis is very useful. Instead of other tools, it will be very helpful and the AI feature is very great.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks and Claroty are on the expensive end of the market, so the client should have those budgets available.
What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?
The potential area of improvement I see for Nozomi Networks is that there are many unknown malwares that cannot be identified because they are not updated in the National Vulnerability Database. Th...
What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?
My main use case for Nozomi Networks is that I have experience with implementation, designing, and configuration.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SCADAguardian
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung Research America, IDT Corporation, Gett
Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis vs. Nozomi Networks and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.