No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Armis vs Nozomi Networks comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Armis
Ranking in IoT Security
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM) (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (7th), Cyber-Physical Systems Protection (1st)
Nozomi Networks
Ranking in IoT Security
2nd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Operational Technology (OT) Security (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the IoT Security category, the mindshare of Armis is 11.9%, down from 19.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 13.3%, down from 30.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IoT Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Armis11.9%
Nozomi Networks13.3%
Other74.8%
IoT Security
 

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Lead Pre-Sales at M.TECH Solutions India Pvt. Ltd.
Comprehensive visibility has transformed how I secure and prioritize risks across connected devices
The best features Armis offers include vulnerability management for OT and IoT devices, providing risk prioritization, and offering protection across all connected assets. Armis cyber exposure management is very good as it provides continuous visibility, risk prioritization, and protection across all connected assets. Armis has positively impacted my organization by providing asset discovery for both OT and IoT, as well as threat visibility for OT and IoT devices along with vulnerability information, including the CVE number so that I can fix the threat on OT and IoT devices. Most of the time, focus is on IT devices and attention is not paid to OT and IoT. Armis facilitates focus on OT and IoT as well, closing the gap that often exists. Armis makes life easier for customers by providing visibility of OT and IoT, as well as threat visibility. Armis has a user-friendly interface, is very useful for customers, provides quality support, and has a global presence allowing easy access for both customers and Armis representatives. The console is user-friendly. Armis handles compliance requirements in my industry very well and is useful.
Apurva Nigam - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Team Member In Engineering And Cybersecurity at Mindsprint
Comprehensive dashboards have enabled detailed asset visibility and proactive risk mitigation
On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved. For example, when I export any data, there are only 50 columns available. What if there were more columns? Nozomi Networks does not provide that data, so I have to go to the query section. The AI is currently useful for writing queries in English that are converted into their coding language for queries. Sometimes it provides the correct data, and sometimes it does not understand the request. From my attempts, I would say 50 percent of the time it has given me the proper data, and 50 percent of the time it might need improvement. Every day or week, new threat intelligence and AI upgrades are being released for Vantage, and all those upgrades are being implemented. Things are getting better, but I believe there are areas of improvement.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution’s vulnerability monitoring system is very good."
"The technology is good."
"Armis transforms cybersecurity from a cost center into a business performance driver, delivering quantifiable ROI through reduced risk, operational efficiency, and compliance readiness for board-level discussions."
"I find the most valuable features of Armis to be its focus on IT, OT security, and medical device security."
"Armis has reduced the cost of employment because before, I had to take all the logs, and the logs required so many more employees, but currently, one employee is handling everything, saving the cost of four employees."
"Real-time asset monitoring in Armis helps with network operations, especially in comparison to Nozomi."
"Armis is easy to use."
"Armis has a positive impact by improving enterprise-wide asset visibility, strengthening risk awareness, and helping the security operations team reduce blind spots."
"This is a good product and I definitely recommend it."
"Nozomi Networks has the best AI-based detection and intrusion detection solution, as it is very robust, easy to deploy, and easy to use with a very user-friendly GUI and good support in terms of product and after-sales support."
"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."
"The feature I like best is its stability."
"I believe it is the best."
"The network visualization feature of Nozomi impacts security operations positively."
"I chose Nozomi because it is far ahead of other competitors, like Curator and Elastic."
"The tool's visibility is good. We can see the traffic flow."
 

Cons

"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."
"The vulnerability assessment for Windows is not that great. It misses out on a lot of vulnerabilities."
"The OpenText solution we used had to improve its development in relation to cloud environments. They have started to offer a version that works on the cloud, but they are really behind in that aspect today."
"After implementing Armis, an organization experiences it as an add-on. Without asset visibility or vulnerability prioritization, it becomes a useless product."
"There isn't anything specific that needs improvement."
"In terms of stability, Armis is not completely stable, as sometimes incidents may occur."
"There are occasional issues with some built-in integrations that require troubleshooting, particularly with DHCP integration. Developing additional integrations would be beneficial."
"I would like more customizable options for configurations."
"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."
"Creating custom queries is time-consuming."
"On the negative side, I believe their AI, which is IQ, could be more improved."
"Nozomi Networks should improve its pricing."
"Nozomi Networks currently offers add-ons, such as ARP agents, that can be installed on machines to expand the information we receive from sensors. However, these are part of a licensing structure, which can be costly."
"I believe there is room for improvement regarding on-premises AI."
"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cheap."
"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."
"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Security solutions are best for your needs.
896,467 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Armis?
AI is one improvement I noted for Armis, and I may have other examples as well.
What is your primary use case for Armis?
I confirm my experience with Armis, and as a cybersecurity specialist, I have several years of experience in this sphere. In terms of AI-driven risk assessments in Armis, I have insights to share b...
What advice do you have for others considering Armis?
I am still dealing with Armis to some extent, as I have not stopped working with it for more than a year. I can confirm that I am also working with other vendors such as Fortinet and various vulner...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?
Nozomi Networks and Claroty are on the expensive end of the market, so the client should have those budgets available.
What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?
The potential area of improvement I see for Nozomi Networks is that there are many unknown malwares that cannot be identified because they are not updated in the National Vulnerability Database. Th...
What is your primary use case for Nozomi Networks?
My main use case for Nozomi Networks is that I have experience with implementation, designing, and configuration.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SCADAguardian
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Samsung Research America, IDT Corporation, Gett
Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Armis vs. Nozomi Networks and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
896,467 professionals have used our research since 2012.