Dragos vs Nozomi Networks comparison

Dragos and Nozomi are both solutions in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category. Dragos is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0, while Nozomi is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8. Dragos holds a 11.6% mindshare in OT, compared to Nozomi’s 29.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Dragos users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nozomi users who would recommend it.

Dragos

Read 2 Dragos reviews

1,952 Views
453 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nozomi Networks

Read 8 Nozomi Networks reviews

5,304 Views
1,654 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Dragos

Nozomi Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dragos and Nozomi Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Dragos vs. Nozomi Networks Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dragos vs. Nozomi Networks

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dragos

Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nozomi Networks

Ranking in Operational Technology (OT) Security

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IoT Security (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Operational Technology (OT) Security category, the mindshare of Dragos is 11.6%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nozomi Networks is 29.5%, up from 28.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Operational Technology (OT) Security

Featured Reviews

Jehin Nadar

OT Cybersecurity Engineer at Nadar

Offers strong incident response features but requires more asset visibility and flexibility

Dragos' best features are that they are more focused towards Incident Response, so they have a dedicated playbook in their platform, making it easier for anyone investigating any incidents to investigate the alerts. One of the main features of Dragos is that they have a dedicated Incident Response team, so if clients need any help, they are there to help. Dragos does real-time monitoring as well, collecting mirror traffic from the span port of the switch, and as soon as it gets the traffic, it analyzes it in real time and shows what's going on in the networks, which relates to the real-time visibility feature for ICS networks.

Read full review

Massimiliano La Camera

Business Development Account Manager at Xenia Network Solutions

Provides cost saving and offers device visibility

I think it's a stable solution and don't foresee any problems in the future. It's a leading security platform and is widely used in Italy. This gives them full visibility of all devices, which is often difficult to achieve. IT managers usually lack visibility into all products and security solutions. However, this platform lets customers gain visibility of their entire device environment. I rate its stability an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Dragos is more expensive than other vendors, probably about fifteen to twenty percent more, but it is generally worth the investment."

"Dragos' best features are that they are more focused towards Incident Response, so they have a dedicated playbook in their platform, making it easier for anyone investigating any incidents to investigate the alerts."

"The most valuable features of Nozomi Networks are the visibility of OT protocols and the versatility in finding the details of the assets feeding the tool."

"It has impacted security operations in a better way."

"I chose Nozomi because it is far ahead of other competitors, like Curator and Elastic."

"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."

"Nozomi Networks is an easy-to-use and powerful tool."

"The network visualization feature of Nozomi impacts security operations positively."

"The tool's visibility is good. We can see the traffic flow."

"The feature I like best is its stability."

More Nozomi Networks pros

Cons

"Dragos could improve its asset visibility and discovery tools, as the competitor Claroty has better options in this area."

"I think Dragos can offer more flexibility similar to Nozomi and more visibility into the assets, nodes, and links, which would make it more competitive in the future."

"I would like more customizable options for configurations."

"The solution should include an integration library."

"Creating custom queries is time-consuming."

"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."

"I believe there is room for improvement regarding on-premises AI."

"Nozomi Networks currently offers add-ons, such as ARP agents, that can be installed on machines to expand the information we receive from sensors. However, these are part of a licensing structure, which can be costly."

"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."

"Nozomi Networks should improve its pricing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."

"The solution's pricing is good and cheaper than that of Claroty."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Energy/Utilities Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dragos?

Dragos is more expensive than other vendors, probably about fifteen to twenty percent more, but it is generally worth the investment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Dragos?

Dragos could improve its asset visibility and discovery tools, as the competitor Claroty has better options in this area. Additionally, integrating out-of-the-box with major ERPs like SAP would be ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Dragos?

We use Dragos ( /products/dragos-reviews ) specifically for managing IoT devices in the industrial sector within our manufacturing ecosystem. It provides a platform to manage, update, and keep trac...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nozomi Networks?

The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nozomi Networks?

Nozomi Networks is priced moderately. Its cost is not too expensive, but it is not low either.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nozomi Networks?

Nozomi Networks currently offers add-ons, such as ARP agents, that can be installed on machines to expand the information we receive from sensors. However, these are part of a licensing structure, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Claroty Platform vs Dragos

Compared 27% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Dragos

Compared 11% of the time

Darktrace vs Dragos

Compared 8% of the time

SCADAfence vs Dragos

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Dragos

Compared 4% of the time

More Dragos Competitors

Claroty Platform vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 35% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 12% of the time

Armis vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Nozomi Networks

Compared 6% of the time

More Nozomi Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Operational Technology (OT) Security

May 2025

Download Dragos product report

Buyer's Guide

IoT Security

May 2025

Download Nozomi Networks product report

Also Known As

Dragos Platform

SCADAguardian

Overview

We provide industrial asset identification, threat detection, and response to help organizations stay ahead of adversaries. The Dragos platform delivers codified industrial cybersecurity expertise that enables security teams to detect and respond faster to industrial cybersecurity threats, reducing dwell time and down time. We enhance ICS defenders’ efficiency and effectiveness via the Dragos platform, Dragos WorldView intelligence reports, and the Dragos Threat Operations Center.

Dragos

Nozomi Networks enhances ICS and OT cybersecurity through threat detection, monitoring, and comprehensive asset management. Users value its real-time anomaly detection, advanced threat detection via machine learning, and intuitive interface, which streamline workflows and boost efficiency, ensuring compliance and robust network security.

Nozomi

Sample Customers

NaturEner

Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group

Buyer's Guide

Dragos vs. Nozomi Networks

June 2025

Free Report: Dragos vs. Nozomi Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Dragos vs. Nozomi Networks and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dragos vs. Nozomi Networks report.

See our list of best Operational Technology (OT) Security vendors.

We monitor all Operational Technology (OT) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.