Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nomad Media vs Sharepoint 2016 Standard comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nomad Media
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
18th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Digital Asset Management (15th)
Sharepoint 2016 Standard
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Nomad Media is 0.3%. The mindshare of Sharepoint 2016 Standard is 0.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Sharepoint 2016 Standard0.3%
Nomad Media0.3%
Other99.4%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2784540 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Application Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Integrates cloud workflows with databases and has revealed areas we still want to explore
The best features Nomad offers directly integrate with AWS, which is useful for us. The database link feature helps my team because we have a lot of database linking. Nomad has positively impacted my organization as it is still in an evaluation phase, so I cannot comment on that right now. I have early signs and expectations that Nomad might improve efficiency.
Trevors Misigo - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Team Lead at Infosys
Cloud file sharing has transformed secure collaboration and protected our data after cyber attacks
The best features Sharepoint 2016 Standard offers, in my opinion, are that it organizes our documents and other materials into folder libraries within a custom website and provides sharing tools and rules specific to that site. It integrates well with other Microsoft products through Office 365. Adding and removing users is easy for administrators. Its simple document structure makes it clear where to best store documents. Out of those features, I find myself appreciating the integration with Office 365 the most, which makes it easier to share files and collaboration. I would also like to highlight that features such as version control to view any changes made and access control over any file or folder stand out to me. Additionally, the intuitive mobile application for easy access on the go enhances our experience. Sharepoint 2016 Standard has positively impacted my organization because since we had a cyber attack in 2017 and implemented this tool, it has been a secure and easy way to store files and access files for the people who are given permission. It can be accessed from anywhere as long as you have an internet connection. Collaboration has been made easier between departments and also with remote employees and clients.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In my opinion, the best feature that Nomad offers is quality, meaning its reliability and performance."
"The best features Nomad offers directly integrate with AWS, which is useful for us."
"Using Sharepoint 2016 Standard enables me to share my thought process and knowledge bases easily across teams as well as within teams."
"After implementing solutions with Sharepoint 2016 Standard, clients tell me it's perfect and appreciate what we've done together."
"Sharepoint 2016 Standard is great software where we can configure applications inside the environment that are very useful for my company and other companies."
"Sharepoint 2016 Standard serves the purpose of storing and retrieving documents, including product-related documents, project-related documents, and any BI-specific documents."
"My advice to others looking into using Sharepoint 2016 Standard is that being able to store files on Sharepoint 2016 Standard has changed the way we manage this data and has reduced errors that end up costing our company."
"Sharepoint 2016 Standard has positively impacted my organization by providing a very good data repository and organization of various amounts of information that is stored in these Sharepoint sites."
"Overall, sixty to seventy percent of turnaround time was saved with Sharepoint 2016 Standard."
"My affinity for Sharepoint 2016 Standard stems from its flexibility and adaptability, which I consistently experience as a significant reason for its success in my projects."
 

Cons

"Right now, I have not seen a return on investment and cannot share relevant metrics with you."
"Sharepoint 2016 Standard can be improved because the user interface slows down productivity for our staff at times; it is very slow."
"While Sharepoint 2016 Standard is powerful, the UI is outdated compared to modern platforms."
"Sharepoint 2016 Standard can be improved by continuing to evolve with changing technology."
"Sharepoint 2016 Standard can be improved by improving navigation."
"One area where Sharepoint 2016 Standard needs improvements is that it is not easy to identify archived documents."
"Sharepoint 2016 Standard can be improved by continuing to evolve with changing technology."
"I would assess the integration of Microsoft Office apps within Sharepoint 2016 Standard for document management as lacking."
"Logging with two-factor authentication is frustrating as it is required every time, making it very annoying."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nomad Media?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is with the infrastructure team, and I asked them to set it up for us, so I do not know how much it cost.
What needs improvement with Nomad Media?
Nomad can be improved, but so far we have not seen scope for improvement, so we will continue our evaluation. I do not want to add more about the needed improvements, even if it is just a wish list...
What is your primary use case for Nomad Media?
My main use case for Nomad is thinking, and we are planning to use it to enrich distributed media content in our company.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
Pricing for Sharepoint 2016 Standard, in my view, is favorable, as it is based on the days of person-hours worked. In contrast, while attempting to implement another documentation system, the costs...
What needs improvement with Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
Sharepoint 2016 Standard can be improved by continuing to evolve with changing technology. Integration with third-party workflows would improve it.
What is your primary use case for Sharepoint 2016 Standard?
My main use case for Sharepoint 2016 Standard is data collection of many policies and procedure documentation and reporting and project management materials. I use Sharepoint 2016 Standard for cond...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Nomad Media vs. Sharepoint 2016 Standard and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.