Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Netskope vs Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Netskope
Ranking in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (4th)
Zscaler Private Access (ZPA)
Ranking in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)
10th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Benjamin Naranjo - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides secure remote access and web navigation protection with highly customizable features
The most helpful features in Netskope are the data loss prevention module, the anti-malware module, and the integration that it has with Information Rights Management from Microsoft. It has better categorization and more granular features regarding web protection, as it allows me to control HTTP methods. I can publish WhatsApp web for my users as read-only, for example. Other providers cannot; they are only on and off, and do not have the granularity for a website to be read-only. That comes with a downside, which is that they need to regularly update their controls to support those features in those websites.
Martin Partridge - PeerSpot reviewer
User access is simplified and secured through central core functionalities
The simplicity and logical structure of Zscaler make it easy to use and administer. It allows grouping, enabling en masse access conveniently. Unlike the BlueCoat proxy, which was more prescriptive and individual-focused, Zscaler offers group access. Additionally, Zscaler's modern tools enhance the network architecture by passing everything through a central core of security, ensuring everything is secure before accessing the internet.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"They are very good at CASB as compared to other players."
"The detection capability is very nice and lightweight."
"Netskope is highly scalable and has supported our organization's growth without any challenges."
"Netskope is an efficient, reliable, and easy-to-manage solution."
"The automation offered by the product is pretty solid."
"Their technical support is very good."
"Netskope is a one-platform security product that provides security functions. It is the most advantageous product in the Japanese market."
"In Azure, we have multiple subscriptions and with every subscription, we add some kind of instance ID. We can work with the instance ID so that we allow all of the instances containing nodules. Everything else, we block. This way, if you go to outlook.com and check your email, if you log in with your company account, the instance ID will show. The network will take action according to the instance ID and say, "You are using the enterprise email. I'll let you surf. I'll let you see your email." But when you try to log in with your own email address, like Hotmail or Gmail, the instance ID will be different. This way we are not completely blocking Outlook, but we are blocking people from accessing their Outlook. We are only allowing the enterprise-level emails, and we are not allowing user-based emails."
"Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) is more secure than these particular VPN solutions."
"Zscaler Private Access helps by resolving network choke issues, allowing application access from public networks without needing to integrate with internal networks."
"It provides security and has a great service user experience."
"The scalability is amazing. Whenever we need to upgrade the users, it increases immediately."
"Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) does an excellent job offering secure remote access to internal applications for our distributed workforce because it provides a granular way to grant access for specific people with specific applications."
"Zscaler has allowed an easy, secure way for us to access our internal resources from outside."
"Zscaler Private Access helps by resolving network choke issues, allowing application access from public networks without needing to integrate with internal networks."
"Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) is much more secure than VPN because users are only allowed to access specific applications rather than the whole network."
 

Cons

"The solution's implementations can be made much easier because, currently, it is complex in nature."
"Netskope needs to improve its stability."
"The solution is still pretty new to the CASB environment."
"The initial setup is complex and should be simplified."
"In some cases, when you have a lot of policies, it can get confusing for users and you can get lost in the GUI."
"There is currently no DLP on-premises."
"The configuration and user behaviour analytics can be improved."
"The limitations in Zero Trust's publisher sessions are a concern. Currently, it supports only between 15,000 to 32,000 sessions."
"I am not happy with the technical support from Zscaler Private Access (ZPA), particularly in India, where reachability is an issue with salespersons."
"The solution is not scalable; we deploy it in a high-availability environment, but it's not automated."
"One area for improvement is setting posture profiles for vendor machines."
"There are some bugs in the solution, which they are clearly working on, and they are still not resolving them. So it's taking some time."
"The lack of control over the 700+ external IPs through which traffic exits Zscaler is problematic."
"Zscaler restricts customization to a maximum of 256 customizable rules, which can be a limitation for us."
"Sometimes connection errors occur when users are unable to connect to the particular cloud."
"The current pain points we sometimes experience relate to the additional security applications we have on the laptops, and sometimes I don't know if I didn't get any notification from the application because it's an agent problem or something security-wise blocking this."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive solution."
"Licensing is on a yearly basis."
"There is a license required for this solution and there are many licensing models available. For example, what applications are covered as part of the license."
"Licensing fees are paid annually."
"I wasn't involved in the initial discussions about its cost. However, within the next year, by around June, I'll need to review the vendors' quotes. Typically, our procurement team handles the process by issuing an RFP to vendors to get quotes. From there, we evaluate based on pricing and may conduct a proof of concept to assess value."
"The price of the solution is fair but it depends on your use case."
"Pricing is a little expensive but it is affordable."
"The price is in the middle range compared to other solutions."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) solutions are best for your needs.
864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
5%
Insurance Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better, Zscaler internet access or Netsckope CASB?
We researched Netskope but ultimately chose Zscaler. Netskope is a cloud access security broker that helps identify and manage cloud applications, protecting your sensitive data from exfiltration....
What do you like most about Netskope CASB?
The product's analytics part is pretty fine.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zscaler Private Access (ZPA)?
Prices for Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) are higher than traditional solutions, but it provides enhanced security.
What needs improvement with Zscaler Private Access (ZPA)?
The only room for improvement is the troubleshooting problem with iPhones as of now. The review should be anonymous; there should not be any personal or business details given. Both should be anony...
What is your primary use case for Zscaler Private Access (ZPA)?
We are using secure remote access for internal applications, and that's why we are using Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) now. I work with Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). I use it just for the VPN functi...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Netskope CASB
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

NetApp, Genomic Health, Caterpillar, Apollo, Pandora, Continental Resources, Fractal, infinera, Tesla
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Netskope vs. Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.