NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and SolarWinds Network Device Monitor compete in the network monitoring category. NETSCOUT appears to have an advantage in detailed packet analysis, while SolarWinds offers better flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
Features: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers comprehensive packet analysis, detailed traffic monitoring, and real-time communications monitoring. It includes a single-pane-of-glass view that integrates application flows and dependency mapping. The platform provides visibility into voice traffic issues such as packet loss and latency, supporting the capture of past data for retroactive analysis. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor focuses on flexibility in monitoring data flow across networks, setting alert thresholds, and providing comprehensive reports. However, its packet analysis and specific monitoring features like link monitoring are less detailed than those of NETSCOUT.
Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE often requires significant expertise to manage due to its complexity, as users report it as needing dedicated staff. Suggestions include a more user-friendly GUI and modular pricing for features. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor lacks granularity in monitoring, and improvements could be made in flexibility and user interface for easier customization. Security enhancements and better integration with other solutions are also suggested areas for improvement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE supports both on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments but often requires dedicated on-site engineers, which affects customer satisfaction with deployment ease. SolarWinds is mostly on-premises with fewer deployment challenges reported. Both tools offer robust technical support, with NETSCOUT potentially needing specialized support contributing to higher service costs, while SolarWinds provides satisfactory standard support.
Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is considered expensive, with customers often paying for unused features due to its comprehensive nature. Despite the cost, it shows ROI by reducing troubleshooting time and increasing network uptime. SolarWinds Network Device Monitor is more competitively priced but still perceived as expensive by some users. It demonstrates ROI by decreasing troubleshooting time and assisting in preventing network issues, thus enhancing customer retention.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| NETSCOUT nGeniusONE | 1.5% |
| SolarWinds Network Device Monitor | 0.6% |
| Other | 97.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 37 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
