No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Nanitor vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nanitor
Ranking in Patch Management
46th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (92nd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (73rd), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (30th)
TeamViewer ONE
Ranking in Patch Management
21st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (22nd), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Nanitor is 0.7%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer ONE is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
TeamViewer ONE0.8%
Nanitor0.7%
Other98.5%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use Nanitor?
Leave a review
Nitesh Ranjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
892,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
15%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?
Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. However, the setup is easy and friendly to use. My overall rating for this product is...
What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to...
What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?
I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.
 

Also Known As

No data available
TeamViewer IoT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Carey Paul Honda
Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Microsoft, NinjaOne and others in Patch Management. Updated: May 2026.
892,611 professionals have used our research since 2012.