N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

Why PeerSpot?

N-able and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. N-able is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0, while TeamViewer is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. N-able holds a 4.8% mindshare in RMM, compared to TeamViewer’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

N-able N-sight Remote Monit...

Read 16 N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management reviews

2,371 Views
1,968 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

TeamViewer ONE

Read 34 TeamViewer ONE reviews

3,117 Views
1,870 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

N-able N-sight Remote Monit...

TeamViewer ONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 24, 2026

N-able N-sight and TeamViewer ONE are two leading remote management solutions. N-able N-sight is favored for pricing and support, while TeamViewer ONE is recognized for its superior features, as noted by users.

Features: N-able N-sight offers comprehensive reporting, script deployment in cloud environments, and remote monitoring across multiple platforms. TeamViewer ONE stands out for its ease of use, stable remote access, and support features that enhance IT maintenance and collaboration tasks.

Room for Improvement: N-able N-sight users seek improved pricing models, reporting customization, and advanced AI integration. TeamViewer ONE could enhance its flexibility with better licensing options, increased security, and reduced connectivity issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: N-able N-sight provides flexible deployment across private, public clouds, and on-premises, offering control and responsive customer service. TeamViewer ONE, while flexible in deployment, occasionally faces challenges with licensing and connectivity issues affecting customer service consistency.

Pricing and ROI: N-able N-sight offers a cost-effective per-node pricing model with strong ROI through efficient management. TeamViewer ONE's higher pricing is offset by its free version and flexibility in paid versions, but users find it generally more expensive compared to competitors.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able N-sight Remote Monit...

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamViewer ONE

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (21st), Patch Management (18th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is 4.8%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer ONE is 4.5%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management	4.8%
TeamViewer ONE	4.5%
Other	90.7%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Daniel Gombe

Chief Executive Officer at SOIT Business Solutions

Remote management and incident handling have improved with customizable alerts and efficient patch management

The best feature in N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is the ease of use because I can remote into any machine that's under management without having to drive out to the customer all the time. It helps to reduce workflows because I can create scripts that I can automate, so I don't have to have many people working for me. It helps to reduce incident response times because it's a combination of tools that logs incidents to the PSA, creates tickets, and allows us to manage incidents all in one for an MSP. It does improve service delivery because we can see what's wrong with certain devices before even the customer has a problem, allowing us to remedy it with the necessary tools.

Read full review

Nitesh Ranjan

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably

One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integrated backup and the scripting are good, and we use them the most."

"It is a pretty good all-around solution, especially for a small business like us who need to look after a limited number of clients."

"The most helpful feature is script deployment because we can create whatever we want to deploy on our devices. This works in a cloud environment, where we previously relied on Active Directory. Since the start of the COVID outbreak, all the staff members began working from home, and most of the people there did not use the VPN to transfer the policies."

"I find all features of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management valuable, but the most valuable is its monitoring feature. The solution has great monitoring functionalities. For example, you can monitor a device in terms of its RAM, CPU, etc. You can also monitor the connectivity through N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management, and you can also check whether a device is down or up through the solution. I also like that you can monitor Windows servers, Linux servers, printers, network devices, and virtualization servers such as VMware and Hyper-V using N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. You can also monitor disk utilization, HTTPS, whether an SSL certificate is valid or expired, etc., through the solution. Apart from monitoring, I also find patch management as one of the most valuable features of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. You can use it for Windows updates, as a patch management example. You can even manage and monitor servers and backup services via N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management, so whenever there's a backup failure or issue, you'll receive alerts from the solution, as long as it's configured as a Windows service, so you can even do a lot of preventive maintenance activities with the help of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. The solution is one of the best RMM solutions I've used so far. It's user-friendly, and it's pretty easy to use because you only need one interface where you can do a lot of activities. As a technician, I'm always concerned with time because if I have to troubleshoot an issue or a major incident, if I have to jump into two or three systems and open a few tabs on those systems, it'll be very hectic, especially if I have to switch between each step to see what's going on. In N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management, it's pretty easy to do because I have one interface and one tab where I can do a lot of processes and activities."

"The most valuable aspect of N-able Remote Monitoring & Management is it provides an all-in solution for the different solutions."

"The reporting for this solution has been most valuable."

"It provides quite a bit of real-time visibility; I can go in and see in real-time the processor use and memory use, it displays a list of the processes running currently and the installed software, and it also gives me warranty information so I know when things are reaching the end of life."

"We like that this solution is in real-time, it gives us real-time monitoring."

More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management pros

"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management was very simple."

"It enhances collaboration among my board members during board meetings, whether annual, regular, or irregular."

"We use the product to communicate."

"It's considered a trusted application."

"The user interface is fine."

"The product is very stable."

"The product is secure."

"The pricing of the solution is very reasonable."

More TeamViewer ONE pros

Cons

"There are disconnection issues sometimes."

"Additionally, N-sight has an anti-human device manager, but it is only for Apple iOS devices, not for Android."

"I would like to see notifications sent with SMS."

"The support could improve."

"After testing, we decided not to proceed with this product. It is very good and has many features, but the cost is very expensive so it is beyond our budget."

"Kaseya is a similar product and they have easier scripts. If you want to deploy one software to 100 machines, we need to dig into it and then we need to create the script and work with the support team and then we can deploy that particular script. The pre-built scripted is the one thing that I would definitely like to have improved."

"The product looks a bit old-fashioned."

"What could be improved in N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management is the reporting, in particular, the reporting interface and the report generation method. Currently, I don't find it easy to run reports on the solution. Every time, if I want a report on a Windows vulnerability because a client requested that report, I find the process difficult. For example, out of one hundred PCs, I need to get a report on how many PCs have not been updated to a specific patch level. I need to give that report to the CTO or CEO of a particular client organization, and as running the report on N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management isn't easy, sometimes, that makes me doubt the validity of the generated report as well. It depends on each case because I do find some reports to be genuine and 100% correct, but most of the time, I have to ask for help from other engineers, and even collaborating with another engineer to run reports isn't that easy, so reporting needs improvement in N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. Another room for improvement in the solution is patch management. The user-friendliness of the Take Control feature in N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management also needs improvement, particularly when it's used on multiple computers or displays. Switching between displays isn't as user-friendly on the technician side, so that could be improved by letting you see all displays or monitors all at once, or on a single display, rather than needing to switch from one display to another. As Take Control is on a Windows agent, or running on a client-end device, that feature of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management could be improved as well. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is a mobile application, though I'm not familiar if that's already available. As an IT MSP, sometimes I have on-call jobs, and I don't always want to look at the mailbox to see if there's any alert triggered from the devices. If N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management has a mobile application that would allow my team to get push notifications whenever there's downtime or issues, then that would make the solution more reliable. I'd like to get an alert that would pop up from my mobile device, so it would be pretty easy to keep an eye on alerts, and I won't have to check my inbox every time."

More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management cons

"They are doing many updates all the time. I don't like having so many updates."

"Using the solution’s remote connection causes some lagging issues."

"When a user is engaged in a chat on a system with a remote user present, copying the chat content isn't easy."

"I want TeamViewer Remote Management to incorporate more integrations."

"It could be more secure."

"The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session."

"The connectivity could improve."

"The compatibility needs improvement in TeamViewer Remote Management because there's some incompatibility in some versions of the solution. Some solutions require the higher-performing version of TeamViewer Remote Management. Otherwise, there's incompatibility. The security provided by TeamViewer Remote Management in terms of data transfer also needs improvement. I'd like to see more features in the next release of TeamViewer Remote Management because it's still lacking in features. It would also be good for TeamViewer Remote Management to have a built-in remoting program similar to what Itarian has."

More TeamViewer ONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive and out of our budget."

"We use SolarWinds RMM on a pay-as-you-go monthly basis, so the cost can be highly variable because it depends on a few factors such as how many devices you need to support and what extra features you want to use. The more devices you have, the more you'll pay, and the same goes for extras."

"The product is fairly priced."

"There is a license required for this solution."

"I haven't paid a whole lot of attention to that since I set it up. It has per-user licensing. If I remember it correctly, it worked out to about $10 a month per user. There were no additional costs. It was pretty straightforward and simple."

"Out clients pay monthly for the license of N-able Remote Monitoring & Management."

"As I'm not part of the procurement team and because I'm 100% technical, I'm not that familiar with the costs associated with N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management, but I can say that in my location, particularly here in Sri Lanka, it's more expensive than other RMM solutions. I'm working for an Australian IT MSP, and over there, the solution isn't as expensive, but where I'm located, it is, so this is the reason why sometimes, clients don't go with N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. Licensing cost is also the reason why my organization is looking into Kaseya RMM. My current organization merged with another organization that's using both Kaseya RMM and Connectwise."

"The solution is not very expensive."

"I have used the free version of the solution."

"The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive. The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive."

"My company uses the free version of TeamViewer Remote Management."

"The solution relies on cloud-based infrastructure so the price is tailored to each individual model used"

"We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee."

"Users need to pay a yearly license for TeamViewer Remote Management."

"We pay for a yearly license."

More TeamViewer ONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for N-able Remote Monitoring & Management?

The typical use case for my clients is that there is no atypical case. I use N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management to have a warning about the state of endpoint and server and also to p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able Remote Monitoring & Management?

There is room for improvement in the functional aspects of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management. For example, it should evaluate the penetration of assets and enhance asset management ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able Remote Monitoring & Management?

My relationship with N-able is as an end-user; I work as an MSP and use this solution to manage my customer endpoints. Regarding the pricing of this tool, I don't have any suggestions. I think the ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?

Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. However, the setup is easy and friendly to use. My overall rating for this product is...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?

I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.

See all answers

Comparisons

ConnectWise Automate vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

Compared 12% of the time

N-able N-central vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

Compared 11% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

Compared 10% of the time

Comodo RMM vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine RMM Central vs N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

Compared 6% of the time

More N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management Competitors

NinjaOne vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 13% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 10% of the time

Azure Bastion vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 10% of the time

GoTo Resolve vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 8% of the time

Atera vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 5% of the time

More TeamViewer ONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management

September 2026

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management report

Download N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer ONE

August 2026

Download TeamViewer ONE product report

Also Known As

N-able Remote Monitoring & Management, SolarWinds MSP Remote Monitoring & Management, MSP RMM, SolarWinds RMM, SolarWinds Remote Monitoring and Management

TeamViewer IoT

Overview

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management provides robust script deployment, comprehensive monitoring, and real-time alerts. It supports multiple platforms for effective asset management and web protection while simplifying IT environments with automation and custom scripting.

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management integrates automation and security, offering multi-platform support that enhances asset management, web protection, and remote connectivity. Its dashboard facilitates patch management and incident response. While users value its background remote access and reporting features, they seek improvements in reporting customization, customer support, and portal communication. Pricing models and mobile compatibility, especially for Android devices, require attention, with a need for a more intuitive interface and better asset management. Enhancements in backup responsiveness and compatibility with direct VMware monitoring are necessary, alongside updates to its appearance and the inclusion of AI capabilities.

What are the key features of N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management?

Script Deployment: Enables efficient mass deployment of scripts across devices.
Real-time Alerts: Offers immediate notifications for quick problem resolution.
Background Remote Access: Allows discreet system control without user disruption.
Integrated Reporting: Provides detailed analytics for better decision-making.
Multi-platform Support: Enhances management across different operating systems.
Automation and Custom Scripting: Reduces manual tasks and increases visibility.

What benefits or ROI can users find in reviews?

Streamlined Management: Centralizes control for efficient IT operations.
Improved Visibility: Enhances oversight of IT environments.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational expenses through automation.
Increased Security: Bolsters network protection and endpoint security.

Industries implementing N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management leverage it for network management, remote support, and monitoring of IT infrastructure like network devices. It aids in phasing out Active Directory and managing IT tasks for clients, providing antivirus deployment and backup management across multiple locations.

N-able

TeamViewer ONE offers remote access and cross-platform functionality, enhancing IT operations across various systems and clouds like AWS and Azure while streamlining setup and secure connections.

Providing a robust platform for IT professionals, TeamViewer ONE enables efficient remote management with features like interactive chat, file transfers, and seamless session management. Despite its strengths, users highlight the need for improved pricing models, security measures, and enhanced stability. Regular updates are requested to tackle connectivity and lag challenges, and improvements in reporting, integration, and mobile remote functionalities are desired.

What are the standout features of TeamViewer ONE?

Remote Access: Facilitates secure control across multiple devices.
Cross-Platform Functionality: Operates on different OS and cloud environments.
File Transfers: Enables smooth and efficient data exchange.
Interactive Chat: Supports real-time communication during sessions.
Remote Management: Provides a comprehensive view of system resources.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Simplifies teamwork with easy connectivity.
IT Support Efficiency: Streamlines troubleshooting and support tasks.
Resource Management: Offers tools for managing system performance.
Security Assurance: Delivers trusted connections for data protection.

TeamViewer ONE is implemented in industries requiring remote support and server management, offering solutions for IT support, remote client connections, and seamless meeting management. It assists in monitoring, troubleshooting, and resolving software and hardware issues for service providers and companies.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

NetSys Network Systems

Carey Paul Honda

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE

September 2026

Free Report: N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs. TeamViewer ONE report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.