MySQL vs Oracle Multitenant comparison

MySQL and Oracle Multitenant are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. MySQL is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Oracle Multitenant is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0. MySQL holds a 8.4% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle Multitenant’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of MySQL users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle Multitenant users who would recommend it.

MySQL

Read 148 MySQL reviews

7,193 Views
5,585 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle Multitenant

Read 20 Oracle Multitenant reviews

703 Views
386 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MySQL

Oracle Multitenant

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and Oracle Multitenant are competitive database solutions with distinct strengths. MySQL, with its open-source nature and affordability, has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, particularly for small to medium-sized businesses. Oracle Multitenant, however, excels in providing advanced enterprise features and resource management, making it preferable for larger organizations seeking high scalability.

Features: MySQL is highly valued for its multi-threaded architecture, strong integration capabilities with LAMP/WAMP stacks, and support for a broad range of programming languages. Oracle Multitenant, on the other hand, provides unparalleled database consolidation features, efficient resource management via pluggable databases, and top-notch security and data recovery options.

Room for Improvement: MySQL could benefit from enhancements in complex data handling capabilities, advanced database management features, and integration approaches. Oracle Multitenant, while offering robust features, faces challenges with high licensing costs and the need for better backward compatibility to ease migration concerns.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL offers simplicity in deployment across various environments, contributing to its cost advantages, though its support relies heavily on community efforts. Oracle Multitenant typically involves more structured deployments with higher initial costs but provides strong, enterprise-level customer support at a premium.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL is often viewed as a cost-effective choice with significant ROI, ideal for businesses looking to minimize investment. In contrast, Oracle Multitenant, despite its higher costs, is justified by its performance and robustness, serving larger enterprises focused on long-term benefits and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

148

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

Oracle Multitenant

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of MySQL is 8.4%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Multitenant is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

Native encryption ensures secure data management with a simple deployment

The most valuable feature is the on-premises data encryption facilities. By default, we can provide encryption, and this feature in MySQL is why we prefer it over other databases. The native encryption in MySQL encourages us to use this database model more frequently compared to Oracle and other databases. With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment. It perfectly supports our ROI, and we have no issues with its functionality.

Read full review

Saikat Nag

Oracle Application Database Administrator at RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

Manages extensive utility billing applications efficiently with trusted performance and robust support

Currently, I have a very good experience with Oracle Multitenant. The pluggable database is easy to handle and manage, sharing resources efficiently. However, Oracle license pricing is an issue due to its high cost. Our organization is compelled to reduce CPU usage by seventy CPUs because the Oracle license cost depends on it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is a small application and is very easy to deploy."

"The one interesting thing about this product is that it is open source. It comes from an open source product. MySQL has been positioned as open source, but it also provides support."

"It was easy to install."

"This specific version of this MySQL has been battle tested for a long time. Any issues are known issues and we pretty much don't have any problems when they're in production. So it's very stable."

"I am totally satisfied with MySQL."

"The solution is very simple. It's easy to use. That's the most important feature."

"While MySQL offers strong basic functionality."

"What I really like about MySQL is the opportunity to search for information and organize it any way I like."

More MySQL pros

"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. Our clients are mostly medium and enterprise businesses."

"Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases."

"The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine."

"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"

"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."

"Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us."

"You can scale the solution as needed."

"Our primary use of Oracle includes writing queries for retrieving data for customers without worrying about the customer ID, user ID, as it is automatically connected to each query."

More Oracle Multitenant pros

Cons

"MySQL could introduce more indexing strategies."

"The solution is expensive."

"We have encountered some performance issues, and the solution takes time for performing complex queries."

"Improvements to MySQL depend on the specific use case. For example, in my scenario, I frequently need to maintain and store data, which can then be utilized to generate reports. On the other hand, others may suggest incorporating a feature that allows for easier visualization of the data, such as what is available in Power BI or other similar tools."

"The performance issues in the product can be considered as an area where improvements are required."

"When working with a cluster wide, I have to use the MySQL cluster version."

"In the next release, I would like to see the scalability features improved to allow you to configure it and reduce the complexity with the configuration, making it easier for the end-user to scale. Make it as simple as it can be."

"I did the implementation of the solution myself and I used community support. The support from the vendor costs money."

More MySQL cons

"The solution lacks a GUI for commands."

"From the scope of improvement, I would say that people are adopting new query options. Certain databases like MongoDB adopt new query options so that they can just pull the data."

"This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."

"Technical support could be faster."

"There are many functions where changes are not easy to implement, and we try to avoid modifying these areas due to security issues and the complexity of maintaining them."

"It can be complicated to scale up the solution, but it's scalable."

"While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive."

"The user interface for this solution can be made better."

More Oracle Multitenant cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We're using the open-source version right now, which is free. I do see some value in some of the more enterprise functions. We're using the open-source version right now, and I was interested in the MySQL Enterprise version really for the tools that they provide, but we decided not to make the purchase."

"MySQL is free."

"There is a licensing cost because we are going for a proprietary product. There are some other versions for which there is no licensing cost."

"I use the open-source free community version."

"The pricing is not much expensive, it's cheap."

"My company uses MySQL's corporate licenses."

"There is no licensing fee."

"I don't pay for a license."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"This solution is a little bit pricey."

"For me, I will go with it if I have the budget. Some features are nicer than before, but at the end of the day, you always have a limited budget. I prefer to upgrade and get a specific hardware when possible. At the end, you will have to make a compromise. You will not get everything you would have liked to have."

"The price is worth the quality."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

22%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Multitenant?

The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Multitenant?

Oracle's licensing costs are very high. Due to the increased license costs, we migrated from Oracle hardware like SuperCluster and MiniCluster to HPE Nutanix to manage costs while continuing to use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Multitenant?

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 26% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 14% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 9% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

Teradata vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 57% of the time

SQL Server vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 43% of the time

More Oracle Multitenant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

April 2025

Download MySQL product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Multitenant

April 2025

Download Oracle Multitenant product report

Also Known As

No data available

Oracle Pluggable Database

Overview

MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.

MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.

What are the most important features of MySQL?

Free and Open-Source: No licensing costs, perfect for budget-conscious projects.
Compatibility: Works with multiple platforms and programming languages.
High Performance: Efficient performance across large datasets.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business needs.
Clustering and Replication: Ensures data availability and redundancy.
Easy Installation: Quick setup process on various operating systems.
Community Support: Extensive resources and community assistance.
Cross-Platform: Operates seamlessly on different operating systems.
Data Management Interface: Simplifies data handling and manipulation.

What are the benefits of using MySQL?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce expenses with a free, open-source database.
Scalability: Adapt to increasing data demands effortlessly.
Performance: Handle large datasets with ease and speed.
Community Support: Access a vast pool of knowledge and resources.
Flexibility: Integrate with various platforms and languages for diverse use cases.
Data Reliability: Clustering and replication for high data availability.

In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.

Oracle

Oracle Multitenant - an Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition option – introduces a new architecture that enables customers to easily consolidate multiple databases, without changing their applications. This new architecture delivers all the benefits of managing many databases as one, yet retains the isolation and resource prioritization of separate databases. In addition, Oracle Multitenant enables rapid provisioning and upgrades, and fully complements other options including Oracle Real Application Clusters and Active Data Guard.

For more information on Oracle Multitenant, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

An Post, National Oilwell Varco, SAS Institute, Sportmaster, Y-Telecom

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant

April 2025

Free Report: MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant

Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.