MySQL vs Oracle Multitenant comparison

MySQL and Oracle Multitenant are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. MySQL is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle Multitenant is ranked #13 with an average rating of 9.0. MySQL holds a 7.6% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle Multitenant’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of MySQL users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle Multitenant users who would recommend it.

MySQL

Read 150 MySQL reviews

9,581 Views
4,599 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle Multitenant

Read 20 Oracle Multitenant reviews

609 Views
603 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MySQL

Oracle Multitenant

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and Oracle Multitenant are competitive database solutions with distinct strengths. MySQL, with its open-source nature and affordability, has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, particularly for small to medium-sized businesses. Oracle Multitenant, however, excels in providing advanced enterprise features and resource management, making it preferable for larger organizations seeking high scalability.

Features: MySQL is highly valued for its multi-threaded architecture, strong integration capabilities with LAMP/WAMP stacks, and support for a broad range of programming languages. Oracle Multitenant, on the other hand, provides unparalleled database consolidation features, efficient resource management via pluggable databases, and top-notch security and data recovery options.

Room for Improvement: MySQL could benefit from enhancements in complex data handling capabilities, advanced database management features, and integration approaches. Oracle Multitenant, while offering robust features, faces challenges with high licensing costs and the need for better backward compatibility to ease migration concerns.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL offers simplicity in deployment across various environments, contributing to its cost advantages, though its support relies heavily on community efforts. Oracle Multitenant typically involves more structured deployments with higher initial costs but provides strong, enterprise-level customer support at a premium.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL is often viewed as a cost-effective choice with significant ROI, ideal for businesses looking to minimize investment. In contrast, Oracle Multitenant, despite its higher costs, is justified by its performance and robustness, serving larger enterprises focused on long-term benefits and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

150

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

Oracle Multitenant

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of MySQL is 7.6%, down from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Multitenant is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MySQL	7.6%
Oracle Multitenant	0.8%
Other	91.6%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Prabir Kumar Kundu

SR AVP–Presales Cloud & Platform Management Services at Path Infotech ltd

Offers robust security and availability with impressive replication capabilities

Regarding their documentation and interface, there is room for improvement. Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system. The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation. When there are multiple application servers connecting to the MySQL cluster and going through the MySQL load balancer, the documentation is not user-friendly. It's there, but only technical persons with deep knowledge of the MySQL database can implement it. Most of the community users or ISVs who use MySQL don't have many technical persons or DBA experts, so they face some challenges for the high availability of connecting high available databases from high available applications. That documentation should be simplified.

Read full review

Saikat Nag

Oracle Application Database Administrator at RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

Manages extensive utility billing applications efficiently with trusted performance and robust support

Currently, I have a very good experience with Oracle Multitenant. The pluggable database is easy to handle and manage, sharing resources efficiently. However, Oracle license pricing is an issue due to its high cost. Our organization is compelled to reduce CPU usage by seventy CPUs because the Oracle license cost depends on it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a community version. When I have to create a new database, I have no problems with licenses."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The fact that it is free is what appeals to me the most."

"This product is a good teaching tool for students who want to learn about networked databases."

"MySQL is easy to integrate. It works with just about every language."

"The solution is very stable."

"The deployment process is pretty fast."

"We use the basic features of MySQL. The interface that allows us to see the parameters of the server is good."

More MySQL pros

"You can scale the solution as needed."

"Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases."

"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"

"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."

"The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine."

"Maintaining databases is a valuable feature for us."

"The stability of Oracle Multitenant is excellent, and I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"Our primary use of Oracle includes writing queries for retrieving data for customers without worrying about the customer ID, user ID, as it is automatically connected to each query."

More Oracle Multitenant pros

Cons

"If it had something similar to Microsoft’s DTS engine then it would be the best database system out there."

"It could be a little bit simpler to use."

"In terms of what I'd like to see in the next release, one thing that's always missing is dash boarding. There's no real BI tool for MySQL, like there is in Yellowfin and all the different tools that you get. They all have MySQL connectors, but there's no specific BI tool for MySQL. These open source projects have sprung up, but they're more general purpose."

"The solution could have better integration and security features."

"The only service which could be improved is its usability. The entire user experience needs to be revamped to meet the 2018 design standards."

"While utilizing a comparable algorithm, is noted to be sensitive, especially when configuring the inner device."

"The performance issues in the product can be considered as an area where improvements are required."

"I would like to see more integrations of the solution with other platforms and improve the support on different data types."

More MySQL cons

"While the product is overall excellent, it is quite expensive."

"From the scope of improvement, I would say that people are adopting new query options. Certain databases like MongoDB adopt new query options so that they can just pull the data."

"Technical support could be faster."

"The solution lacks a GUI for commands."

"There is room for improvement in customer service and support."

"Oracle license pricing is an issue due to its high cost. Our organization is compelled to reduce CPU usage by seventy CPUs because the Oracle license cost depends on it."

"There are many functions where changes are not easy to implement, and we try to avoid modifying these areas due to security issues and the complexity of maintaining them."

"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve."

More Oracle Multitenant cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For the on-premise version, no license is required."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"The solution does not come with a licensing fee."

"The tool is open source."

"It is an open source platform."

"MySQL is a free and open-source solution."

"We are using the licensed version of MySQL."

"It's free."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"This solution is a little bit pricey."

"For me, I will go with it if I have the budget. Some features are nicer than before, but at the end of the day, you always have a limited budget. I prefer to upgrade and get a specific hardware when possible. At the end, you will have to make a compromise. You will not get everything you would have liked to have."

"The price is worth the quality."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

24%

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	31
Large Enterprise	61

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Multitenant?

The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Multitenant?

Oracle's licensing costs are very high. Due to the increased license costs, we migrated from Oracle hardware like SuperCluster and MiniCluster to HPE Nutanix to manage costs while continuing to use...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Multitenant?

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 23% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 14% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 57% of the time

SQL Server vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 43% of the time

More Oracle Multitenant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

August 2025

Download MySQL product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Multitenant

August 2025

Download Oracle Multitenant product report

Also Known As

No data available

Oracle Pluggable Database

Overview

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

Oracle Multitenant - an Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition option – introduces a new architecture that enables customers to easily consolidate multiple databases, without changing their applications. This new architecture delivers all the benefits of managing many databases as one, yet retains the isolation and resource prioritization of separate databases. In addition, Oracle Multitenant enables rapid provisioning and upgrades, and fully complements other options including Oracle Real Application Clusters and Active Data Guard.

For more information on Oracle Multitenant, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

An Post, National Oilwell Varco, SAS Institute, Sportmaster, Y-Telecom

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant

September 2025

Free Report: MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant

Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.