MuleSoft Composer vs SharePlex comparison

Salesforce and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Salesforce is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.8, while Quest Software is ranked #47. Salesforce holds a 0.7% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,461 Views
672 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SharePlex

Read 5 SharePlex reviews

1,777 Views
1,226 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

SharePlex

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

SharePlex and MuleSoft Composer are complementary products in the data management and integration category. MuleSoft Composer seems to have the upper hand in integration capabilities, which may justify its higher costs, whereas SharePlex is favored for pricing and support.

Features: SharePlex offers robust data replication capabilities with efficient handling of multiple targets and sources, ensuring reliable and high-performance data transfer. It provides utilities like Compare and Repair for maintaining data integrity. MuleSoft Composer stands out with extensive integration options due to its Salesforce ecosystem compatibility, excellent handling of various data sources, and pre-built connectors that save time and resources.

Room for Improvement: SharePlex could enhance its platform by expanding its integration features and offering cloud-based solutions to stay competitive. Improvements in user interface and analytics capabilities would benefit users. Meanwhile, MuleSoft Composer can work on reducing its initial configuration complexity and lowering costs. Further improvements in real-time monitoring and scalability might provide additional value to users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SharePlex is praised for straightforward deployment and user support, ensuring quick implementation. MuleSoft Composer offers ease of integration through its cloud-based model, yet requires more initial configuration. SharePlex focuses on technical support, while MuleSoft emphasizes seamless integration, reflecting distinct customer service approaches.

Pricing and ROI: SharePlex is recognized for competitive pricing and notable ROI due to its efficient replication and low operational costs. In contrast, MuleSoft Composer has higher initial expenses but promises substantial ROI through advanced integration capabilities. SharePlex’s cost-effectiveness is valued, though MuleSoft's extensive integration solutions may justify its cost for those needing better connectivity.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Composer vs. SharePlex Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. SharePlex

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Data Integration

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (15th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)

SharePlex

Ranking in Data Integration

47th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SharePlex is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Composer	0.7%
SharePlex	0.9%
Other	98.4%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

Kristopher Wells

Oracle DBA at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It reduces the downtime and migration time exponentially

I would rate SharePlex's high availability, and disaster recovery features highly. It works as advertised in terms of rapid fill-over and switch-over opportunities. It reduces the migration time for a multi-terabyte database to an hour or less because it performs real-time replication. SharePlex reduces downtime and migration time exponentially. Something that could take 12 to 24 hours is cut down to one to two hours. By the time you start to migrate, the only remaining replication is a slight difference in data from the point when SharePlex has shut down, and the application has to also switch over to the new database. It allowed the company to replicate data more transparently. Some of the business executives probably don't even know it's there. It works 100 percent of the time, with little downtime or problems. It provides what is needed. There's little concern about whether or not it functions. It's allowed the company to achieve its objectives with its clients, reducing and minimizing downtime for substantial migrations and upgrades. It can reduce hardware and storage costs, but my company doesn't utilize it with high-availability architecture.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"There are some capabilities within SharePlex where you can see how the data is migrating and if it still maintains good data integrity. For example, if there are some tables that get out of sync, there are ways to find them and fix the problem on the spot. Since these are very common issues, we can easily fix these types of problems using utilities, like compare and repair. So, if you find something is out of sync, then you can just repair that table. It basically syncs that table from source to target to see if there are any differences. It will then replicate those differences to the target."

"I like SharePlex's Compare and Repair tool."

"The core replication and its performance. Performance is crucial, and SharePlex is by far the fastest. The way it handles replication to multiple targets along with basic filtering, as well as from multiple sources to a single target, is very efficient."

"Because of the volume of the transactions, we heavily use a feature that allows SharePlex to replicate thousands of transactions. It's called PEP, Post Enhancement Performance, and that has helped us scale tremendously."

"The core features of the solution we like are the reliability of the data transfer and the accuracy of data read and write. The stability of the solution is also excellent."

Cons

"I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"I would like the solution to have some kind of machine learning and AI capabilities. Often, if we want to improve the performance of posting, we have to bump up a parameter. That means we need to stop the process, come up with a figure that we want to bump the parameter up to, and then start SharePlex. Machine learning and AI capabilities for these kinds of improvement would tremendously help boost productivity for us."

"I don't know how easy it would be to change the architecture in an already implemented replication. For example, if we have a certain way of architecting for a particular database migration and want to change that during a period of time, is that an easy or difficult change? There was a need for us to change the architecture in-between the migration, but we didn't do it. We thought, "This is possibly complicated. Let's not change it in the middle because we were approaching our cutover date." That was one thing that we should have checked with support about for training."

"The reporting features need improvement. It would be very good for users to have a clear understanding of the status of replication."

"I would like more ability to automate installation and configuration in line with some of the DevOps processes that are more mature in the market. That would be a considerable improvement."

"For its function in relation to replication (i.e. filtering), I'd give it a six or seven out of 10. GoldenGate has much more functionality by comparison."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"It is not as expensive as Oracle GoldenGate and has worked really well within our budgets."

"It's really good value for the money. There are some things they could improve on, but in terms of the pricing, features, and support, as a holistic package, we are not thinking of anything else at this point in time."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 13% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Oracle GoldenGate vs SharePlex

Compared 33% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex

Compared 14% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs SharePlex

Compared 11% of the time

Fivetran vs SharePlex

Compared 10% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs SharePlex

Compared 9% of the time

More SharePlex Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

SharePlex

January 2026

Download SharePlex product report

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Dell SharePlex, SharePlex

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

SharePlex delivers robust database replication and migration capabilities, emphasizing performance, synchronization, and data integrity management. Supporting high availability and real-time data syncing, it serves organizations handling vast transaction volumes, especially in IoT data processing.

SharePlex offers reliable data transfer and efficient multi-target replication. Its features like Compare and Repair utilities assist in maintaining data consistency. With PEP fostering scalability for large transactions, it caters to businesses aiming to cut down migration windows and minimize outages. Users employ SharePlex in real-time syncing and failover scenarios across data centers, crucial for handling extensive transaction data during migrations or upgrades.

What are SharePlex's key features?

Core Replication: Ensures reliable data synchronization across multiple targets.
Data Integrity Management: Maintains accuracy during reading and writing processes.
Compare and Repair Utilities: Facilitate data consistency checks and fixes.
PEP: Enhances performance for large transaction volumes.

Why consider SharePlex for your database needs?

Scalability: Supports large-scale transactions with efficiency.
Minimized Downtime: Provides continuous data availability during operations.
Business Continuity: Enables seamless failover and data center transitions.
Real-time Syncing: Supports time-sensitive data processing requirements.

Organizations in sectors like finance and telecommunications implement SharePlex to maintain uninterrupted operations and ensure quick recovery times. By facilitating database migrations to cloud platforms like AWS, they achieve reduced downtime and enhanced operational efficiency, catering to the rigorous demands of data-driven industries.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Bodybuilding.com, Priceline.com, Ameco Beijing, Viasat, SK Broadband

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. SharePlex

January 2026

Free Report: MuleSoft Composer vs. SharePlex

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. SharePlex and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Composer vs. SharePlex report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.