MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Red Hat AMQ comparison

Salesforce and Red Hat are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Salesforce is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Red Hat is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.5. Salesforce holds a 8.9% mindshare in MQ, compared to Red Hat’s 9.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Read 58 MuleSoft Anypoint Platform reviews

2,382 Views
1,370 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Red Hat AMQ

Read 9 Red Hat AMQ reviews

1,905 Views
1,128 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Red Hat AMQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and Red Hat AMQ are key players in the integration and messaging solutions market. MuleSoft is favored for its comprehensive API and hybrid integration solutions, making it ideal for complex deployments, whereas Red Hat AMQ is preferred for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness in handling lightweight messaging, especially within OpenShift environments.

Features: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is known for its extensive library of over 200 connectors, a user-friendly design interface, and robust hybrid deployment capabilities, which facilitate complex API developments and integrations. Red Hat AMQ excels with its lightweight structure, reliability, and seamless integration with OpenShift, which suits message-oriented tasks well.

Room for Improvement: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform could benefit from lower costs, better documentation, and more efficient technical support to address user concerns. Red Hat AMQ might improve by enhancing its visualization tools, adopting technology updates more rapidly, and making technical support less procedural.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform supports diverse deployment environments, including public and private clouds, hybrid, and on-premises configurations, but its customer service can be delayed. Red Hat AMQ is designed for on-premises and cloud setups, offering client-centric support, which, despite being structured, remains proactive.

Pricing and ROI: While MuleSoft offers substantial ROI through its comprehensive API-led integration, its pricing is generally viewed as high, particularly for smaller businesses, complicated by a complex licensing model. Red Hat AMQ provides a straightforward licensing process and is praised for its affordability and value when bundled with OpenShift.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (1st), Workload Automation (4th), Cloud Data Integration (4th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (2nd)

Red Hat AMQ

Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 8.9%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat AMQ is 9.7%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Queue (MQ) Software

Featured Reviews

Tolulope A. Adeniji

Retired at a educational organization with 11-50 employees

Provides application integration and reduces time and effort during upgrades

One of the most valuable aspects was its impact on reducing time and effort during upgrades. Previously, SAP upgrades required significant coordination with multiple teams. Now, thanks to our streamlined integration approach, the SAP team interacts primarily with the integration team. When changes are needed, we simply create a new version. This allows application teams to migrate gradually from the old version to the new one, without extensive involvement from the SAP team. Moreover, our approach has improved reliability by eliminating duplicated efforts. Previously, different teams would often duplicate data sets due to inefficiencies in data naming conventions. We centralized data integration, ensuring that all applications use the same data set.

Read full review

Sther Martins

Java Developer at SCCON

An easy-to-learn solution that can be used with microservices

We have done around 20 projects in Red Hat AMQ. I have two projects using Red Hat AMQ, and I can share how its scalability has impacted them. In one project, we have a solution for authentication and authorization using SSO. We need to integrate with other systems in two ways. We use Red Hat AMQ for social data, sending messages to other queues, and integrating with business. We have two databases with the same information. The solution is good because it helps us solve problems with messaging. For instance, when messaging doesn't change, we still check the cloud and verify the information. In another project, we have a large banking solution for the Amazon region using Red Hat AMQ for financial transactions. In this solution, business messages are sent, and another system processes them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good interface, simple to use and stable."

"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."

"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."

"The monitoring capabilities of this product are very good because of the feedback it supplies in statistics."

"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."

"The most valuable feature is their integrations and very good API management."

"The solution is scalable, and its performance is quite good."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pros

"This product is well adopted on the OpenShift platform. For organizations like ours that use OpenShift for many of our products, this is a good feature."

"Red Hat AMQ's best feature is its reliability."

"The most valuable feature is stability."

"The solution is very lightweight, easy to configure, simple to manage, and robust since it launched."

"Reliability is the main criterion for selecting this tool for one of the busiest airports in Mumbai."

"AMQ is highly scalable and performs well. It can process a large volume of messages in one second. AMQ and OpenShift are a good combination."

"I can organize the tool with microservices, which allows me to use it across different services. It is easy to learn."

"The most valuable feature for us is the operator-based automation that is provided by Streams for infrastructure as well as user and topic management. This saves a lot of time and effort on our part to provide infrastructure. For example, the deployment of infrastructure is reduced from approximately a week to a day."

More Red Hat AMQ pros

Cons

"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."

"Mule should have better B2B integration."

"I would like to see some data integration and automation."

"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."

"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."

"When we are integrating with other applications, readily available connectors make it easy. However, when it comes to external applications, connectivity isn't as straightforward."

"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."

"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform cons

"There is improvement needed to keep the support libraries updated."

"There are several areas in this solution that need improvement, including clustering multi-nodes and message ordering."

"The challenge is the multiple components it has. This brings a higher complexity compared to IBM MQ, which is a single complete unit."

"The product needs to improve its documentation and training."

"This product needs better visualization capabilities in general."

"There are some aspects of the monitoring that could be improved on. There is a tool that is somewhat connected to Kafka called Service Registry. This is a product by Red Hat that I would like to see integrated more tightly."

"The turnaround of adopting new versions of underlying technologies sometimes is too slow."

"AMQ could be better integrated with Jira and patch management tools."

More Red Hat AMQ cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is the priciest in the market which is an issue for some clients."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is an expensive solution."

"Mule Anypoint Platform is affordable."

"The tool is heavily bundle-priced. I rate the solution’s pricing five on a scale of ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"The solution has a high price."

"The product is still very expensive."

"The solution's pricing, as per the old approach, is expensive."

"Regarding pricing, I believe there could be room for improvement to align with user expectations."

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform pricing and cost advice

"There is a subscription needed for this solution and there are support plans available."

"This is a very cost-effective solution and the pricing is much better than competitors."

"I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive."

"Red Hat AMQ's pricing could be improved."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes; What I see is though if you are an enterprise and have enough money th...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration and connectivity software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mule...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform for API management, as it lets us build new APIs easily and design new interfaces...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat AMQ?

The product needs to improve its documentation and training.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat AMQ?

We just started working with Red Hat AMQ. We selected it as the ESB (Enterprise Service Bus) platform for a new airport project. I manage the entire Master System Integration (MSI) project for one ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat AMQ?

I didn't have any problems using Red Hat AMQ and would recommend it. The documentation is good, and I encountered no issues during installation. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 18% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 7% of the time

IBM MQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ActiveMQ vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 37% of the time

Apache Kafka vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 28% of the time

IBM MQ vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 19% of the time

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions vs Red Hat AMQ

Compared 5% of the time

More Red Hat AMQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

June 2025

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat AMQ

June 2025

Download Red Hat AMQ product report

Also Known As

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ, Red Hat JBoss AMQ

Overview

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is used for integration and API management, connecting enterprise applications across retail, e-commerce, and supply chain. It supports cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-on-premises scenarios with real-time and asynchronous messaging.

Users leverage MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for diverse integrations including cloud-based and on-premises, enabling data transformations, middleware functions, and hybrid integrations. It seamlessly connects systems like SAP, Salesforce, and Oracle, facilitating data transfers and integrating legacy systems. The platform offers a graphic interface, quick implementation, and a variety of connectors, contributing to its popularity for robust and scalable solutions. Despite its strengths, users seek better technical support, more connectors, simplified runtime management, and improved documentation.

What are the key features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

Marketplace for integration platforms: Provides pre-built connectors and templates.
API management: Efficient management and monitoring of APIs.
Graphic interface: User-friendly design for ease of use.
Monitoring capabilities: Comprehensive monitoring and observability features.
Quick implementation: Rapid deployment of integrations and APIs.
Pre-built templates: Ready-to-use templates for common integrations.
Stability and performance: Reliable and high-performing platform.
Data transformation with DataWeave: Powerful tool for data mapping and transformation.
Support for hybrid deployments: Flexibility to integrate cloud and on-premises systems.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased connectivity: Seamless integration of multiple systems.
Operational efficiency: Streamlined processes and data flows.
Scalability: Ability to grow with business needs.
Cost savings: Reduced development time with pre-built components.
Enhanced visibility: Improved monitoring and management of integrations.

Enterprises in retail, e-commerce, and supply chain implement MuleSoft Anypoint Platform to connect various applications and systems. It supports real-time messaging for inventory management, synchronizes customer data across platforms, and integrates with legacy systems for smooth data migration. Users benefit from quick deployments and a marketplace that accelerates integration projects.

Salesforce

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat

Sample Customers

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

June 2025

Free Report: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs. Red Hat AMQ report.

See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.