Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Monte Carlo vs Qlik Talend Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 18, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Monte Carlo
Ranking in Data Quality
30th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Data Observability (2nd)
Qlik Talend Cloud
Ranking in Data Quality
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
54
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (9th), Data Scrubbing Software (1st), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (7th), Data Governance (8th), Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) (4th), Streaming Analytics (9th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Quality category, the mindshare of Monte Carlo is 1.3%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Talend Cloud is 6.6%, down from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Quality Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Qlik Talend Cloud6.6%
Monte Carlo1.3%
Other92.1%
Data Quality
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2774796 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Governance System Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Data observability has transformed data reliability and now supports faster, trusted decisions
The best features Monte Carlo offers are those we consistently use internally. Of course, the automated DQ monitoring across the stack stands out. Monte Carlo can do checks on the volume, freshness, schema, and even custom business logic, with notifications before the business is impacted. It does end-to-end lineage at the field level, which is crucial for troubleshooting issues that spread across multiple extraction and transformation pipelines. The end-to-end lineage is very helpful for us. Additionally, Monte Carlo has great integration capabilities with Jira and Slack, as well as orchestration tools, allowing us to track issues with severity, see who the owners are, and monitor the resolution metrics, helping us collectively reduce downtime. It helps our teams across operations, analytics, and reporting trust the same datasets. The best outstanding feature, in my opinion, is Monte Carlo's operational analytics and dashboard; the data reliability dashboard provides metrics over time on how often incidents occur, the time to resolution, and alert fatigue trends. These metrics help refine the monitoring and prioritize our resources better. Those are the features that really have helped us. The end-to-end lineage is essentially the visual flow of data from source to target, at both the table and column level. Monte Carlo automatically maps the upstream and downstream dependencies across ingestion, transformation, and consumption layers, allowing us to understand immediately where data comes from and what is impacted when any issue occurs. Years ago, people relied on static documentation, which had the downside of not showing the dynamic flow or issue impact in real time. Monte Carlo analyzes SQL queries and transformations, plus metadata from our warehouses and orchestration tools, providing the runtime behavior for our pipelines. For instance, during network outages, our organization tracks metrics such as SAIDI and SAIFI used internally and for regulators. The data flow involves source systems such as SCADA, outage management systems, mobile apps for field crews, and weather feeds pushing data to the ingestion layer as raw outage events landing in the data lake. Data then flows to the transformation layer, where events are enriched with asset, location, and weather data, plus aggregations that calculate outage duration and customer impact, ultimately reaching the consumption layer for executive dashboards and regulatory reporting. Monte Carlo maps this entire food chain. Suppose we see a schema change in a column named outage_end_time and a freshness delay in downstream aggregated tables; the end-to-end lineage enables immediate root cause identification instead of trial and error. Monte Carlo shows that the issue is in the ingestion layer, allowing engineers to avoid wasting hours manually tracing SQL or pipelines, which illustrates how end-to-end lineage has really helped us troubleshoot our issues.
HJ
IT Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Has automated recurring data flows and improved accuracy in reporting
The best features of Talend Data Integration are its rich set of components that let you connect to almost any data design intuitive and its strong automation and scheduling capabilities. The TMap component is especially valuable because it allows flexible transformation, joins, and filtering in a single place. I also rely a lot on context variables to manage different environments like Dev, Test, and production, without changing the code. The error handling and logging tools are very helpful for monitoring and troubleshooting, which makes the workflow more reliable. Talend Data Integration has helped our company by automating and standardizing data processes. Before, many of these tasks were done manually, which took more time and often led to errors. With Talend Data Integration, we built automated pipelines that extract, clean, and load data consistently. This not only saves hours of manual effort, but also improves the accuracy and reliability of data. As a result, business teams had faster access to trustworthy information for reporting and decision making, which directly improved efficiency and productivity. Talend Data Integration has had a measurable impact on our organization. By automating daily data loading processes, we reduced manual effort by around three or four hours per day, which saved roughly 60 to 80 hours per month. We also improved data accuracy. Error rates dropped by more than 70% because validation rules were built into the jobs. In addition, reporting teams now receive fresh data at least 50% faster, which means they can make decisions earlier and with more confidence. Overall, Talend Data Integration has increased both efficiency and reliability in our data workflows.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Monte Carlo's introduction has measurably impacted us; we have reduced data downtime significantly, avoided countless situations where inaccurate data would propagate to dashboards used daily, improved operational confidence with planning and forecasting models running on trusted data, and enabled engineers to spend less time manually checking pipelines and more time on optimization and innovation."
"It makes organizing work easier based on its relevance to specific projects and teams."
"What I like about the Talend MDM Platform is that it's a good vendor diagnostic tool."
"The most valuable feature is integration."
"Flexibility is a key feature I appreciate about Talend Data Integration, especially the integration of Java within it and the ease of integrating with multiple source repositories such as GitHub and Bitbucket."
"We have used value frequency and patterns. We have been it impressed with these functions as they have helped us in making decisions in transformation work."
"The features that I find to be the most valuable are the extensibility, the integration, and the ease of integration with multiple platforms."
"The basic tools are easy to pick up and understand."
"I like the way that you can use the context variables, and how you can work those context variables to give you values and settings for every development environment, such as PROD, TEST, and DEV."
"It reduces the QA effort immensely by handling most of the test scenarios in a reusable way."
 

Cons

"For anomaly detection, the product provides only the last three weeks of data, while some competitors can analyze a more extended data history."
"Some improvements I see for Monte Carlo include alert tuning and noise reduction, as other data quality tools offer that."
"The stability is good, but the performance is slower when I work on a huge amount of data."
"The product must enhance the data quality."
"I think they should drive toward AI and machine learning. They could include a machine-learning algorithm for the deduplication."
"I would say that some of the support elements need improvement."
"Heap space issues plague us consistently. We maxed it out and it runs fine, then it doesn’t, then it does."
"If the SQL input controls could dynamically determine the schema-based on the SQL alone, it would simplify the steps of having to use a manually created and saved schema for use in the TMap for the Postgres and Redshift components. This would make things even easier."
"The ability to change the code when debugging the JavaScript could be improved."
"I'd be interested in seeing the running of Python programs and transformations from within the studio itself."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product has moderate pricing."
"It's a subscription-based platform, we renew it every year."
"The solution's pricing is very reasonable and half the cost of Informatica."
"The pricing is a little higher than what I had expected, but it's comparable with I-PASS competitors."
"It is cheaper than Informatica. Talend Data Quality costs somewhere between $10,000 to $12,000 per year for a seat license. It would cost around $20,000 per year for a concurrent license. It is the same for the whole big data solution, which comes with Talend DI, Talend DQ, and TDM."
"The price of the Talend Data Management Platform is reasonable. The other competing solutions are priced high. Gartner Magic Quadrant identified other solutions, such as Informatica, that are far more expensive."
"The tool is cheap."
"The licensing cost for the Talend MDM Platform is paid yearly, but I'm unable to give you the figure. I would rate its price as four out of five because it's on the cheaper side. I'm not aware of any extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees for the Talend MDM Platform."
"We did not purchase a separate license for DQ. It is part of our data platform suite, and I believe it is well-priced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Quality solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Retailer
7%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Talend Data Quality?
The most valuable feature lies in the capability to assign data quality issues to different stakeholders, facilitating the tracking and resolution of defective work.
What needs improvement with Talend Data Quality?
I don't use the automated rule management feature in Talend Data Quality that much, so I cannot provide much feedback. I may not know what Talend Data Quality can improve for data quality. I'm not ...
What is your primary use case for Talend Data Quality?
It is for consistency, mainly; data consistency and data quality are our main use cases for the product. Data consistency is the primary purpose we use it for, as we have written rules in Talend Da...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Talend Data Quality, Talend Data Management Platform, Talend MDM Platform, Talend Data Streams, Talend Data Integration, Talend Data Integrity and Data Governance
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Aliaxis, Electrocomponents, M¾NCHENER VEREIN, The Sunset Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, SAP, Qlik and others in Data Quality. Updated: January 2026.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.