MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs Oracle Berkeley DB comparison

The compared MongoDB and Oracle solutions aren't in the same category. MongoDB is ranked #2 in ND , with an average rating of 8.4, and holds a 13.1% mindshare in the category. Oracle is ranked #7 in EDS , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of MongoDB users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Read 82 MongoDB Enterprise Advanced reviews

12,004 Views
5,762 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Oracle Berkeley DB

Read 5 Oracle Berkeley DB reviews

1,430 Views
529 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Oracle Berkeley DB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MongoDB Enterprise Advanced and Oracle Berkeley DB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, MongoDB, Redis and others in NoSQL Databases.

To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,701 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (7th), NoSQL Databases (2nd), Managed NoSQL Databases (6th)

Oracle Berkeley DB

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Embedded Database (7th), Non-Relational Databases (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Databases solutions, they serve different purposes. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is designed for NoSQL Databases and holds a mindshare of 13.1%, down 15.2% compared to last year.
Oracle Berkeley DB, on the other hand, focuses on Embedded Database, holds 5.7% mindshare, up 4.2% since last year.

NoSQL Databases Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced	13.1%
Redis	8.3%
Cassandra	8.2%
Other	70.4%

NoSQL Databases

Embedded Database Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Berkeley DB	5.7%
SQLite	13.6%
SAP HANA	12.8%
Other	67.9%

Embedded Database

Featured Reviews

Anand Bandi

Co-Founder at Vsigma IT Labs Pvt Ltd

Have managed customer transaction data efficiently and supported high-demand workloads with reliable performance

The integration between data warehouse could be improved. Nowadays, a lot of data is getting generated, so certain ETL flexible scripts with backend database integrations would be an improvement I could see. I will not be able to clearly say there is currently a deficiency there. All our DBs are integrated with a backend data warehouse, not necessarily AWS. When third-party data warehouses are integrated, we are seeing some ETL job performance issues. It is a one-off scenario so we have not thoroughly done any troubleshooting on that. It could be platform or third-party related issue. From the AWS standpoint, if robust integration and data warehouse integration specific tools are added in the advanced suite, that would definitely be helpful.

Read full review

Emad Mokhatab

Solution & Software System Architect at Shaparak

Easy to integrate and manage the setup phase

One of the things that I want to see in Oracle Berkeley DB is a driver for reactive programming. I think the tool's official driver for reactive programming, especially for Java, is the thing that Oracle needs to be more agile in, specifically in those areas of programming that other products are currently going into. Other tools have become more innovative in many areas. I know that Oracle has many responsibilities in maintaining the situation with the current projects and so on. I think it would be very cool if Oracle could make improvements to its projects, as it can help me with my current projects. One reason why I don't choose Oracle Berkeley DB is because we want to go for reactive programming, along with Project Reactor from Spring, but we don't have the official driver for it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would recommend MongoDB because it is widely used by many organizations."

"The installation of MongoDB is straightforward."

"One of the most valuable features of MongoDB is it is Its open source."

"I like its performance and the stability; it's very stable and, performance-wise, it's really great."

"It stores historical data with ease. For example, if you are a healthcare member, then you will have multiple records of visits to the doctors. To store such data in Oracle Database, you have to create many records. You might also have duplication problems because your records are going in again and again, because of which the data warehouse and the maintenance cost will be huge. MongoDB is comparatively lightweight. It is a JSON extract. Once you define a schema and extract it, you can push all the relationships in any way you want. It is easier to define and get different types of transactions into MongoDB. It is also easier to set it up as compared to other solutions. MongoDB is a NoSQL database, which means it is a document DB in which you can store documents that you created in BSON. It is pretty fast in response. It is faster than relational databases because it does not define any primary keys, secondary keys, tertiary keys, and all those kinds of things."

"Most of the features are very nice and MongoDB is a solution that I would recommend."

"It is really a pretty easy product to use. It's very reliable, it's proven."

"MongoDB is simpler to learn and implement than traditional SQL solutions like MySQL."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pros

"We always had predictability, and by using a custom-built data service layer with plugins, it provided us a lot of scalability, fast turnaround for our fast-moving business requirement and huge data."

"The product meets all the essential business requirements."

"The tool's performance is good, and I don't have any problems with it."

"This product helped us to develop a performance-critical DB backend module in the healthcare domain."

"As a key/value store, Oracle BDB is simple to use, and it provides ACID transactions for companies that cannot afford eventual consistency."

Cons

"MongoDB could improve by not having so many updates and different versions."

"Simplifying the aggregation framework would be an improvement."

"It should have GUI for managing clusters. MongoDB needs a more powerful GUI to manage clusters and make switchovers. Currently, there is no good, free tool to check the replication to find out if there is a gap."

"The transaction could use improvement. From MySQL, for example, you cannot create a transaction if you are reading and writing a document at the same time."

"The stability could be improved."

"It has certain limitations when it comes to handling hierarchical data, enforcing relationships, and performing complex joins, which should be taken into account when designing databases for applications with intricate data requirements."

"The solution should more easily integrate with custom code."

"It could be more stable. It would be better if it were more user-friendly like Oracle, which is very easy. For example, creating an index is simple in Oracle. In MongoDB, it's quite challenging to do that. Performance could be better. It's fast and good, but you cannot put every application that you would like to in MongoDB."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced cons

"The product's interface could be more intuitive and user-friendly."

"Environment corruption is a common problem found when a DB environment is used by more than one process on a machine at a time."

"Memory usage becomes a problem when the number of entries stored within the key/value store are quite high (hundreds of millions)."

"There were some mid-term small releases that caused database crashes, but this was later fixed."

"I think the tool's official driver for reactive programming, especially for Java, is the thing that Oracle needs to be more agile in, specifically in those areas of programming that other products are currently going into."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an open-source solution."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"The pricing is normal. Price-wise, the product is not too much expensive."

"There is an enterprise license and it could be cheaper. We are using the free open source version."

"MongoDB's pricing is reasonable."

"MongoDB's pricing is not reasonable, but it is not as expensive as the others."

"I believe that the licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"MongoDB is a free solution. We wanted to have high availability and the subscription cost was quite expensive because the basic one is free and then when you want to have some other replications or other features you will need to pay money. Overall the solution is expensive."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pricing and cost advice

"There is a need to pay for the licenses and features of the tool."

"I rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Educational Organization

11%

University

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	39

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?

I think it depends on the provider. For example, on DigitalOcean, they have strict routing. You have to whitelist an IP address, or you risk getting DDoS. Then if you're going for the Atlas one tha...

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB?

I don't really have a deep dive into it, but I see that MongoDB Enterprise Advanced has RAG and Vertex support. However, we really didn't use it because I think one thing also is that Prisma, the O...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for MongoDB?

A typical use case for MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is mostly for the database, storing our data.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Berkeley DB?

There is a need to pay for the licenses and features of the tool. It can help other people use the tool properly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Berkeley DB?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Berkeley DB?

Giving out some free subscriptions and offering some premium plans for enterprise solutions that Oracle presents to the audience can help other people who want to use it. Being more agile in adapti...

See all answers

Comparisons

MongoDB Atlas vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 6% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

Redis vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

InfluxDB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

MySQL vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Competitors

SQLite vs Oracle Berkeley DB

Compared 15% of the time

DuckDB vs Oracle Berkeley DB

Compared 9% of the time

InterSystems Caché vs Oracle Berkeley DB

Compared 8% of the time

Claris FileMaker vs Oracle Berkeley DB

Compared 8% of the time

ENEA Polyhedra vs Oracle Berkeley DB

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Berkeley DB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

August 2026

Download MongoDB Enterprise Advanced product report

Buyer's Guide

Embedded Database

July 2026

Download Oracle Berkeley DB product report

Also Known As

No data available

Berkeley DB

Overview

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is a comprehensive platform renowned for its scalability, user-friendliness, and high performance, underpinned by its flexible document-based storage and open-source model. JSON compatibility, clustering, and security elevate its standing among professionals.

The platform facilitates efficient data management through developer-friendly tools and a strong aggregation framework. MongoDB’s no-schema requirement, supported by community expertise, underlines its adaptability. While its sharding capabilities and affordably support large data volumes, there are aspects such as security enhancement and enterprise tool integration that need attention. Indexing and query optimization pose challenges, alongside high costs. Improvements in analytics and UI could advance its infrastructure further.

What are the key features of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced?

Scalability: Dynamic adjustments to workloads with ease.
JSON Compatibility: Seamless data structuring with JSON support.
Clustering: Enhanced data management through robust clustering.
Security Integration: Built-in security measures for data protection.
Sharding: Efficient distribution of large datasets.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Document-Based Storage: Flexibility in managing varied data types.
Open-Source: Access to a broad community and resources.
Low-Cost Implementation: Economic efficiency in deployment.
Scalability: Supports the growth of data without sacrificing performance.

Industries leverage MongoDB Enterprise Advanced for significant roles in data storage within IoT platforms, healthcare apps, public service monitoring, and big data analytics. Companies in logistics and telecommunications find it instrumental for business process management and video content management, benefiting from its seamless integration and unstructured data support.

MongoDB

Oracle Berkeley DB is an embedded database known for high performance and scalability, suitable for applications requiring efficient data management. It supports a wide range of platforms, making it a versatile choice for developers.

Designed for high availability and transactional integrity, Oracle Berkeley DB offers a lightweight, fast storage engine. Its flexibility allows for custom implementations across multiple languages, enhancing its utility in embedded systems. With capabilities like ACID transactions, it assures data consistency and durability. Its minimal footprint and low latency make it ideal for applications where speed is critical, efficiently handling both simple and complex data management tasks.

What are the most important features of Oracle Berkeley DB?

ACID Compliance: Ensures reliable transactions and data integrity.
Scalability: Effectively handles large volumes of data.
Multiple API Support: Provides flexibility with C, C++, Java, and other languages.
High Availability: Offers replication for uninterrupted data access.
Low Latency: Optimizes speed for rapid data retrieval and storage.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Efficient resource utilization minimizes expenses.
Performance Gains: Enhanced processing speeds improve application response time.
Flexibility in Deployment: Supports diverse environments and platforms.
Reliability: Steady performance under heavy workloads ensures consistent service delivery.
Enhanced Data Management: Robust features streamline data handling processes.

In telecommunications, financial services, and retail industries, Oracle Berkeley DB is implemented to support high-transaction applications where reliability and speed are critical. Its adaptability allows seamless integration, catering to the specific data management needs of these industries.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google

Safe Water Kenya

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, MongoDB, Redis and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.