I chose MongoDB because it is cost-effective compared to Oracle, which can be expensive. In addition, MongoDB has good performance and has not caused any issues while working with it. It has been a good choice for me.
MongoDB is a free solution. We wanted to have high availability and the subscription cost was quite expensive because the basic one is free and then when you want to have some other replications or other features you will need to pay money. Overall the solution is expensive.
Senior Associate at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Reseller
2021-04-03T15:35:32Z
Apr 3, 2021
The pricing is quite high and we don't appreciate the solution raising prices so much. I'm following up with the licensing, however, I don't have the exact figures right now. I mostly advise some companies about that, and usually do not go into detail. What I'm interested in, for example, is when you implement some solution in some company what are the costs for that company in the near future, for example, in one or two years. This is what we are thinking about. It's not easy to implement some solutions in some small companies if at the beginning they need to pay some licensing costs upfront. For example, for Mongo DB. It would be easier if the small companies could operate without licensing for some period of time and then only after they grow to a certain size or need they would have to pay some for that usage.
Managing Director at SimSol Technologies And Services Pvt Ltd
Real User
2020-09-27T04:10:01Z
Sep 27, 2020
For people who can afford it, there are good subscription offers that are available on the cloud as well as on-premises. On-premises is still a little expensive. However, if a company decides to go to the cloud, it is pretty affordable. If the company is small, there is a community edition that can be taken advantage of. If a company needs to scale quite a bit, they'll need to move up to the enterprise version. Due to the fact that we are a BFSI focused product company, we typically recommend that users go for the enterprise-level license. There is also pricing surrounding support. We're in discussions with MongoDB about that now. I don't know the exact costing just yet, however, I know it isn't free.
Senior Data Scientist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 10
2019-12-05T06:53:00Z
Dec 5, 2019
I would definitely recommend MongoDB. I'm hoping MongoDB will continue to be developed from strength to strength because I think it's an awesome tool. I hope that other products, like DocumentDB, will find a way to work with MongoDB to improve the overall stability of the product. It would be good if other services that host Mongo would become more readily available. It was very useful to actually have a hosted MongoDB set up that is maintained by Mongo Atlas. I would rate it 9 out of 10 because we had very little issues and it did exactly what we wanted it to do.
Headquartered in New York, MongoDB's mission is to empower innovators to create, transform, and disrupt industries by unleashing the power of software and data. Built by developers, for developers, our developer data platform is a database with an integrated set of related services that allow development teams to address the growing requirements for today's wide variety of modern applications, all in a unified and consistent user experience. MongoDB has tens of thousands of customers in over...
MongoDB is an open-source product. We don't have to pay for the licenses.
I only used the open-source version.
MongoDB's pricing is reasonable.
I chose MongoDB because it is cost-effective compared to Oracle, which can be expensive. In addition, MongoDB has good performance and has not caused any issues while working with it. It has been a good choice for me.
I would rate pricing a seven out of ten. It is a bit costly.
I currently use the solution's community edition which is free.
The licensing for the solution is free.
MongoDB has an open-source model.
MongoDB is a bit expensive compared to its competitors.
MongoDB is a free solution. We wanted to have high availability and the subscription cost was quite expensive because the basic one is free and then when you want to have some other replications or other features you will need to pay money. Overall the solution is expensive.
You only have to pay for the paid version, not the open-source version.
I believe that the licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.
I cannot speak to the exact pricing of the solution. I don't have any visibility on those details.
There is an enterprise license and it could be cheaper. We are using the free open source version.
There is an annual subscription for the use of this solution.
The solution is open source, so it is free. There is no licensing fee.
MongoDB has a free version. You can also buy the enterprise edition, which is cheaper than Oracle.
There's no license cost, it's open source.
It's open-source.
Our customers pay for yearly licenses for MongoDB.
The pricing is quite high and we don't appreciate the solution raising prices so much. I'm following up with the licensing, however, I don't have the exact figures right now. I mostly advise some companies about that, and usually do not go into detail. What I'm interested in, for example, is when you implement some solution in some company what are the costs for that company in the near future, for example, in one or two years. This is what we are thinking about. It's not easy to implement some solutions in some small companies if at the beginning they need to pay some licensing costs upfront. For example, for Mongo DB. It would be easier if the small companies could operate without licensing for some period of time and then only after they grow to a certain size or need they would have to pay some for that usage.
At the moment, all customers are using the community version.
I don't know, but I have heard from people who procure it that it is much cheaper than Oracle.
For people who can afford it, there are good subscription offers that are available on the cloud as well as on-premises. On-premises is still a little expensive. However, if a company decides to go to the cloud, it is pretty affordable. If the company is small, there is a community edition that can be taken advantage of. If a company needs to scale quite a bit, they'll need to move up to the enterprise version. Due to the fact that we are a BFSI focused product company, we typically recommend that users go for the enterprise-level license. There is also pricing surrounding support. We're in discussions with MongoDB about that now. I don't know the exact costing just yet, however, I know it isn't free.
We use the open-source version, which is available to use free of charge.
This is an open-source solution.
MongoDB is an open-source solution.
We are using the Community Edition of MongoDB. However, we would be happy if the pricing for the full version were more competitive.
I would definitely recommend MongoDB. I'm hoping MongoDB will continue to be developed from strength to strength because I think it's an awesome tool. I hope that other products, like DocumentDB, will find a way to work with MongoDB to improve the overall stability of the product. It would be good if other services that host Mongo would become more readily available. It was very useful to actually have a hosted MongoDB set up that is maintained by Mongo Atlas. I would rate it 9 out of 10 because we had very little issues and it did exactly what we wanted it to do.