No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Mimecast Advanced Email Security vs Sophos Email Appliance [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Mimecast Advanced Email Sec...
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Email Archiving (2nd), Email Security (5th), Office 365 Protection (2nd), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (3rd)
Sophos Email Appliance [EOL]
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Avinash Mishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - EUC at Finthrive
Advanced email filtering has blocked massive spam volumes and prevents unauthorized data leaks
Improvements for Mimecast Advanced Email Security include enhancing the user interface and accessibility, particularly regarding admin capabilities to add or modify user accounts. Streamlining this could improve overall usability and security management for users. Reporting is another area needing improvement in Mimecast Advanced Email Security, as the reports provided are not very easy to decipher. With artificial intelligence being integrated into various tools including Mimecast Advanced Email Security, I believe there is potential to enhance functionality, enabling users to ask specific questions and retrieve concise answers instead of overwhelming data. I choose a nine for Mimecast Advanced Email Security because improvements such as better user interface and artificial intelligence integration features would greatly enhance its usability. While no tool is perfect, these adjustments could greatly elevate Mimecast Advanced Email Security's capabilities.
reviewer1279443 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Security Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Easy to install and secures users against URL relay attacks, spam, and malicious attachments
The frequency in which this solution receives technical updates should be improved. If they are to be rated as the number one email appliance then they should also be the first to receive updates. It should happen across all of the customers, immeidately. In the next release of this solution, I would like to see more user awareness, such as information about phishing email attacks that have been prevented. The baselining and reporting is better with some of the competing solutions.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Mimecast Mailbox Continuity helps companies continue to move."
"Mimecast has been in the market for a long time; it's a good tool if you want to simplify your operations and a good tool for removing on-prem appliances that otherwise you would need to do with the protection that Mimecast provides."
"Mimecast Mailbox Community is an email gateway required for every organization, regardless of size."
"My advice for others looking into using Mimecast Advanced Email Security is that they can strengthen their security very well if they choose to go with it."
"What I like about the integration is that it is directly into Microsoft 365, users can use their Microsoft 365 credentials to log into the portal and access their mail."
"The platform's most valuable features are journaling and email archiving, effectively stopping phishing attacks."
"The product's most valuable features are impersonation protection and phishing countermeasures."
"It offers an easy initial setup."
"The filtering aspect is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The solution is scalable; we have about 400 users on it right now."
"The interface makes it really easy to administer and configure."
"Sophos Email Appliance provides a layer of security that effectively defends against malicious attacks that arrive via email."
"The ease of use and the security offered by the solution are its most valuable features, and it also offers good information protection."
"The most valuable feature is the URL relay protection because it protects users from phishing attacks."
"Using this solution, they are no longer able to manipulate emails."
"Previous issues were resolved as soon as we deployed the solution."
 

Cons

"The system is not user-friendly because you have to create policies that are mapped in a dictionary."
"Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competition in the Indian market, and the local presence is lacking as they do not have a local representative currently."
"Technical support has been slower than it was in the past, likely due to the pandemic."
"The solution is expensive in comparison to similar solutions."
"We discussed the phishing aspect, the DNS system, and the key rotation."
"Their support should be improved. They are notorious for sending you to knowledge-based articles rather than actually talking to you about the problem you're reporting."
"This solution can be frustrating. It blocks many things that should be going through."
"Mimecast Advanced Email Security needs to improve in this area because they are only focusing on a particular set of problems which is on email and human risk, whereas companies that need a slightly bigger picture will look elsewhere."
"The baselining and reporting is better with some of the competing solutions."
"In the advanced version, you have DLP, Data Loss Prevention, but when you buy the standard version, you don't have it."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see more user awareness, such as information about phishing email attacks that have been prevented."
"Reporting could have more options for users to customize desired results."
"There aren't enough advanced settings. They should offer more advanced options."
"It may be possible for them to improve on the options in reporting."
"The reporting functionality is in major need of improvement."
"Occasionally the solution doesn't catch spam mail."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."
"The price of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is expensive."
"The product price is moderate. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."
"It is a bit expensive."
"Compared to the other solutions in the market, Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection's pricing is fine."
"The product has good pricing in terms of return on investment."
"Its price is in the middle range. It is a structured licensing model where there are various components that you can add or choose to add or not."
"The customers can select the license packages as per their requirements."
"Negotiate as much as you can."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.
912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise23
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?
There is room for improvement since new threats are emerging. Considering the availability of new features would be worthwhile. Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competi...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection, Mimecast Web Security, Mimecast Mailbox Continuity, Email and Collaboration Threat Protection
Email Appliance
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hewlett-Packard Company (HP), Cushman and Wakefield, PIB Group, Swissport
Investors Savings Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, Microsoft, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Email Security. Updated: August 2026.
912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.