Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025
Symantec Web Application Firewall and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are competing in application threat protection. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and integration within its ecosystem.
Features: Symantec Web Application Firewall offers robust security protocols, integration capabilities, and extensive customization for enhanced protection. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides cloud-native architecture, auto-scaling, and integrated services like Azure Front Door. While Symantec is strong in flexibility and integration, Azure offers an edge with scalability.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Symantec Web Application Firewall requires straightforward deployment, sometimes needing more manual configuration, supported by consistent customer service. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway benefits from seamless integration and deployment due to its automated processes and extensive Azure ecosystem documentation. Both products offer reliable customer service, but Azure's streamlined deployment processes are particularly advantageous for cloud-based operations.
Pricing and ROI: Symantec Web Application Firewall's pricing is initially cost-effective, though ongoing maintenance could raise total costs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway provides competitive pricing through bundled services, offering a potentially higher ROI over time due to its scalable model. Symantec's immediate cost advantage may be eclipsed by Azure's long-term value benefits.
