McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix comparison

The compared McAfee and Zix solutions aren't in the same category. McAfee is ranked #13 in SOAR , with an average rating of 8.7, and holds a 0.7% mindshare in the category. Zix is ranked #15 in SEG , and holds a 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zix users who would recommend it.

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Read 42 McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator reviews

1,117 Views
626 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Webroot Advanced Email Encr...

Read 1 Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix review

329 Views
148 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Webroot Advanced Email Encr...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR).

To learn more, read our detailed Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,021 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (13th)

Webroot Advanced Email Encr...

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator and Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is designed for Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) and holds a mindshare of 0.7%, up 0.6% compared to last year.
Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix, on the other hand, focuses on Secure Email Gateway (SEG), holds 0.7% mindshare, down 1.1% since last year.

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator	0.7%
Microsoft Sentinel	16.3%
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR	9.7%
Other	73.3%

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

Secure Email Gateway (SEG) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix	0.7%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365	27.5%
Proofpoint Email Protection	21.0%
Other	50.8%

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

Featured Reviews

Binu Haneef

System Administrator at Sky News Arabia

Comprehensive security management enabled through efficient integration and automation

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator helps automate routine security tasks. We created customized automation. For example, when we did not have an EDR or XDR solution, we created tasks exclusively for detection and response automation and automatic segregation of infected PCs. The ability to customize the dashboard in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator helps us significantly. The main feature is automation for auto-segmentation and segregation. As we are in an AI era, McAfee can focus on AI tools. Instead of putting manual effort into each security-related task, it can implement more advanced automation using AI. This enhancement could improve cybersecurity significantly. Regarding the reporting area in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, we are satisfied with what we currently have. Our cybersecurity team needs customized reports beyond the default ones. We have more than 20 separate reports for identifying threats, managing, and understanding the security posture of our company and assets.

Read full review

John Zupancic

Vice President / Branch Manager / Senior Technician at Aperion Information Technologies, Inc.

Inexpensive, with good email security, but the technical support could be improved

We don't have as many problems with email security. They have some areas that could be improved. For example, we also use this solution for email encryption, which was clunky and could be improved, but the email security itself has been excellent. The web interface works well but the Outlook plug-in has been problematic. We've had to uninstall/reinstall it. On some Outlook clients (including mine), it causes Outlook to stop responding. I disabled the Outlook plug-in and only use the web interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is very easy."

"I like the solution's feasibility. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is also better and easier to use than other ePOs."

"I really like the auditing component because it really looks at exactly what has happened on the network."

"The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly."

"What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console."

"The graphical interface of the solution is its most valuable aspect."

"The central management console is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"The most valuable feature of the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is agent communication."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pros

"They do a better job of determining what's real and what's not than most of the other solutions we have tried, and it's been very painless to use."

Cons

"The way that ePolicy launches the updates is very slow. It would be great if that was faster."

"There are some issues we are having with updating our Windows server. So we need to contact support or access our support portal."

"While there are bugs and a few functionality issues, it is just a matter of raising them with the support team. However, support is part of the problem as well. You want everything to be seamless in a perfect world, but the support is spread across different countries. They have Level 1, 2, and 3. Level 1 is most likely in a developing country. They don't provide the best service."

"McAfee should improve in terms of customer support and assigning a knowledgeable TAM to customers."

"The rollout to cover the online resources, such as SharePoint, One Drive, and Office 365 doesn't seem to have a very clear path."

"Lacks a single plug-in for multiple uses."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator support has been helpful. However, sometimes when I raise the case they take a while to answer. For example, the last time I used them it took them two weeks to reply back by email. No one has contacted me back since. They should improve their service."

"The detection aspect should be improved so that signatures are updated more quickly."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator cons

"They have some areas that could be improved. For example, we also use this solution for email encryption, which was clunky and could be improved, but the email security itself has been excellent."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is priced in the mid-range."

"McAfee tries to package different things into different products, then sell them as different products with different licenses. They just split everything up into multiple things. That's just their sales pitch and how they do it."

"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is not an expensive solution."

"There is a license required to use this solution. If we use the additional components, such as DLP encryption, there is an additional cost. However, it is similar to a separate product altogether. If you want to use that or not, it is optional, but when you use it, it will cost you additional pricing."

"It's an expensive solution"

"It is attractively priced. It is a fraction of what we're going to pay for CrowdStrike or SentinelOne, but it only has a fraction of the capabilities as well."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

"In terms of pricing, I believe they provide excellent value."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,021 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	19

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator network security software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mcafee's ePolicy O...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION ePO?

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator's performance is good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee MVISION ePO?

It's an expensive solution.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Splunk SOAR vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 27% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 25% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 24% of the time

GTB Technologies Inspector vs McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

Compared 24% of the time

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix

Compared 52% of the time

Cisco Secure Email vs Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix

Compared 48% of the time

More Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator

August 2025

Download McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator product report

Buyer's Guide

Secure Email Gateway (SEG)

August 2025

Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix report

Download Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix product report

Also Known As

McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee MVISION ePO

Zix Email Encryption, ZixEncrypt

Overview

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

McAfee

Proven Content Filters

To send an encrypted email, your employees simply create a message and hit ‘send'. Our content filters take care of the rest.

Transparent Delivery

When your employees receive an encrypted reply, the experience is just as easy. They simply open the encrypted email like regular email. No matter where they are or what device they use, if your customers and partners have email, they can easily receive encrypted email.

Convenient Recipient Experience

Our patented Best Method of Delivery ensures all messages are delivered in the most secure and easy manner possible, including transparent, pull and push methods. For pull delivery, secure web portals can be in the cloud or on-site. Also among our robust methods is secure PDF for statement delivery.

Simplified Quarantined Messages

If an email is quarantined, then employees, managers and IT receive notification to view the message and policy violations and can delete the email, or justify and release it for delivery.

Zix

Sample Customers

Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke

Erie County of Pennsylvania’s Human Services Department, Justice Federal Credit Union, STAR Financial Group, Chisago County, Minn., The National Banks of Central Texas, Kentucky Retirement Systems (KRS), Frankfort, Ky, Athletico Physical Therapy, District of Columbia Retirement Board (DCRB), CIBM Bank

Buyer's Guide

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR)

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,021 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.