We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus and VMware Workspace ONE based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."It is a comprehensive security solution that not only controls access to enterprise resources but also tracks and prevents unauthorized access, ensuring the protection of sensitive data and preventing potential data loss scenarios."
"It is very easy to use. It has a very easy interface."
"Fortunately, now everything is streamlined into a single, unified platform."
"The many policies available in Microsoft Intune for managing our devices are valuable."
"I can reach devices or computers over the internet. I don't need to worry about the network connectivity between the offices. I can manage any device. That is the most important part."
"Mobile device management is most valuable."
"Application deployment and keeping the devices secure no matter where they are, by having this cloud solution — that has been great."
"The ability to (somewhat) manage full Windows 10 computers including EXE-based or MSI-based application deployments using Azure Active Directory as Identity."
"Can manage a large fleet of devices without any outside interference."
"The solution has very good documentation."
"It was easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it enables us to remotely manage the devices, which is its purpose, and to push applications to the mobile devices from the portal."
"Remote management is most valuable. It allows you to manage multiple types of devices. It is not just limited to laptops or desktops. You can also manage IoT devices. If a device is lost or stolen, you can easily take control of the device without letting any information get leaked."
"Among the most important improvements is the ability to set up different groups with different deployment policies."
"You can upgrade and migrate the existing group policies that we use for VMware Workspace ONE for the active directory. We can push the policies and group policies. We can migrate it and manage it from VMware Workspace ONE."
"The Identity component of this solution is its most valuable feature."
"The performance is good, and it is easy to configure."
"We haven't really gone through all the features of Intune. We are just discovering them. Every day, we see a new feature that we want to apply, but what will be great for Intune is to be able to deploy apps in a simple fashion. We should be able to easily install various apps on the Windows platform, iOS, and Android. Currently, we have to write some scripts. It's not as straightforward as we would like it to be. It should be simplified so that we can do it just with three clicks—next, next, finish—without needing to write a script."
"There is still a gap between SCCM and Intune, especially in the reporting, inventory, and software deployment areas."
"There can be more logs. I do not have any other requirements."
"Integrating certain group policies can be challenging and may necessitate using on-premises systems to integrate them with Microsoft Intune."
"I'd like some more reporting so that I don't have to delve into PowerShell and I can pull more of the local device information such as memory, apps installed, etc. It would be nice to be able to see the apps that are present there but might not be managed. For example, if they installed 7Zip, it could report that back via an installed program or feature to see what was currently installed."
"Microsoft Intune is not user-friendly to manage and has room for improvement."
"The Mac integration has room for improvement."
"They could also make it easier to use because there are some other products that may be easier to use in terms of the look and feel of the dashboard."
"Lacks a factory reset feature."
"From an improvement perspective, there is a need for discounts to be offered by the solution since it is something that any organization can expect from the product."
"We'd like to see a better connection to Microsoft Azure and a better connection with Check Point."
"The console comes bunched together as a package and inbuilt. Its called Workspace ONE. Whenever we have an issue, we contact the service provider, and instead of a fix, we are just getting the next version of Workspace ONE."
"Lacks a modern enterprise mobility management platform."
"I'd like to see expanded device support, particularly for IoT things like SCADA devices."
"There could be ease of integration within the environment. I didn't have any issues when using it, but the integration part was a bit difficult for the other team."
"Security aspects such as data loss prevention could be improved."
"AirWatch doesn't seem to empower IT admins to try new things or get creative with implementations."
ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review while VMware Workspace ONE is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 81 reviews. ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is rated 10.0, while VMware Workspace ONE is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus writes "Great features with very good function management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Workspace ONE writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and offers single sign-on". ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, IBM MaaS360, Google Endpoint Management and SOTI MobiControl, whereas VMware Workspace ONE is most compared with VMware Horizon, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Citrix Workspace.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.