

Postman Enterprise and Make are competing products in the API management and automation market. Make is perceived as having superior features, especially with its advanced integration and automation capabilities.
Features: Postman Enterprise stands out with robust API testing capabilities, collaborative features, and ease of use. The platform makes sharing and managing API tests efficient across teams. Make excels with its automation breakthrough, such as an extensive library for integrations, a simple UI, and drag-and-drop features that simplify complex automation processes.
Room for Improvement: Postman Enterprise could enhance its API automation capabilities and make its integration processes more seamless. Improving customer onboarding and documentation could help teams utilize the full potential of its features. Make could work on simplifying its initial setup process to increase accessibility. Enhancements in cost-effectiveness and a wider range of pre-built integrations could also benefit Make users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Postman Enterprise offers straightforward deployment with extensive support resources, making it ideal for teams needing quick setup. Make provides flexible deployment suited to complex environments, albeit requiring more involvement. Make's customer service offers thorough guidance, offering personalized support that is highly appreciated by users.
Pricing and ROI: Postman Enterprise is known for competitive pricing which appeals to budget-conscious teams, ensuring fast to medium-term ROI. Make, despite a potentially steeper initial setup cost, delivers substantial long-term ROI through its expansive integration offerings, justifying its higher pricing by enhancing operational efficiencies.
I have indeed seen a return on investment as it has saved us hundreds of hours in repetitive tasks, streamlining our follow-up to the leads that we are generating.
I implemented a booking system for my client that previously required data to be entered directly into Google Sheets and reminders to be sent manually; using Make, they have saved about 50% of their time, which equals one labor resource, translating to a significant amount of money saved.
With that extra time each month, I could focus more on sales and upscaling my business, so it is really worth it.
Earlier, I took one week for all planning before releasing some activities, which reduced to three days, sometimes to two days, which is about a 50% improvement in engineering efforts, time, and release cycles.
Faster bug detection has helped reduce production issues and rework, improving collaboration and reducing delays between development and QA teams.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
We have escalated a few issues that we faced during some integrations, and we received reasonable responses from Make support.
They were doing the best job for my use cases and my problems.
When I had a problem during the pricing payment, the customer support handled it very well.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
The documentation, community support, and onboarding resources were especially helpful for quickly resolving common issues.
The response time is generally good for enterprise-level tickets, and the documentation and community resources are helpful for resolving common issues.
When you have an error, it is very hard to do error handling and debugging.
It can handle increasing workloads or more complex automations easily, but I need to set up each and every component carefully.
Make's scalability is very good, and if the pricing were lower, I could scale a lot more.
Features such as shared workspace, role-based access control, governance, private API networks, and organization-level management make it suitable for enterprise collaboration.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
Postman Enterprise scales well for larger projects and growing teams, supporting centralized workspace management, team collaborations, role-based access control, SSO, and governance features for enterprise-scale use.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
During the development phase, you will face issues, but once it goes to production, you won't face such issues.
There should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make.
I would love to have more detailed logs, step-by-step error tracing, and better visualization of failed executions, as I think it would improve the user experience significantly.
The lagging problem needs to be solved.
If that integrates with an IDE, it will be a game changer.
Better advanced reporting, deeper analytics for API testing trends, and more simplified governance management for large organizations would also be valuable improvements.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
Licensing was affordable.
I found a solution that allows me to use Make almost for free, just using the Docker on-premises.
It's cost-effective and it's pocket-friendly.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
Make has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to solve use cases for hundreds of clients across hundreds of different platforms, providing the customization capabilities to automate accounting and invoicing processes that save dozens of man-hours a month, and allowing us to build custom churn, retention, and engagement costs that have driven a 30% reduction in churn.
Instead of spending several days implementing and testing API integrations inside our FastAPI back end, I was able to build the workflows in a few hours using Make.
The task that I would complete in a span of one day is completed in a matter of minutes by using Make.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Make | 0.5% |
| Postman Enterprise | 0.4% |
| Other | 99.1% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
Make is a robust automation platform that streamlines workflows, connecting apps to enhance productivity. Tailored for tech-savvy users, it offers dynamic automation solutions that optimize processes and facilitate seamless integration of disparate systems.
At its core, Make empowers businesses to automate tasks through an intuitive builder with drag-and-drop capabilities. Ideal for professionals who need to integrate systems efficiently, it supports a wide range of applications, aiding in the creation of complex workflows without the need for extensive coding. Users value its adaptability, making it a popular choice for enhancing operational efficiency.
What features does Make offer?In industries like retail and technology, Make has become essential for automating inventory management, order processing, and customer relationship tasks. Companies leverage its capacity to connect multiple databases, CRM systems, and sales platforms, driving growth and operational excellence.
Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.
Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.
What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.
We monitor all AI Software Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.