MuleSoft API Manager and Postman Enterprise occupy different niches in the realm of API solutions. MuleSoft stands out in comprehensive API lifecycle management with robust integration and security features, while Postman garners favor for its simplicity and ease of use, especially in development and testing.
Features: MuleSoft API Manager offers strong security protocols, a large set of connectors, and integration with DevOps, providing a low-code environment. Postman Enterprise excels with features like automated testing, environment variables, and a drag-and-drop interface, enabling speed and teamwork.
Room for Improvement: MuleSoft API Manager users highlight issues with pricing and complex setup, as well as a lack of automation with Kubernetes and Docker. Postman Enterprise could improve its support for SOAP APIs, reporting functionalities, and integration capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft API Manager presents varied deployment options but challenges users with a complex setup, offering solid technical support needing better response times. Postman Enterprise, with its simple setup, supports quick deployments and is praised for efficient customer service.
Pricing and ROI: MuleSoft API Manager is seen as expensive due to licensing costs, justified by its features, yet concerns about cost-effectiveness arise. Postman Enterprise, offering a free version and reasonably priced enterprise option, is accessible, though its feature limitations might affect ROI.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
Our enterprise pays for a special success program, which provides priority support.
They can be slow in addressing security vulnerabilities.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
There was an issue when trying to implement a request-reply pattern using JMS, which was not functioning as expected despite being documented.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
The tool is generally stable.
Introducing features related to auto governance without manual effort would make the API Manager smarter and more efficient for enterprises with complex landscapes.
Managing the cost of MuleSoft, particularly the billing model based on the number of active cores/threads, has been challenging.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
This feature would allow the response to be validated in the database as well.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
MuleSoft is typically more expensive compared to using Java or Spring Boot APIs hosted in containers.
The cost for using MuleSoft is approximately $500,000 USD per year.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
MuleSoft's ability to connect to third-party monitoring platforms like AWS, Datadog, and Elastic makes operational analysis more efficient.
It also enables us to create additional layers of authentication, like integrating external providers for OAuth, within reduced timelines.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
It has helped significantly since it is easy; the development team and QA team all use it, enabling us to automate almost 70% of our APIs using Postman.
Mulesoft API Manager is the portion of the Anypoint Platform that is used for the designing, building, managing, and publishing of APIs. Anypoint Platform uses Mule as its core runtime engine.
Mulesoft API Manager is an extremely versatile solution. It offers users the ability to deploy their APIs in a number of different settings. You can use API Manager on a public cloud, a private cloud, or a hybrid. Additionally, users can use the solution to manage their deployments with ease. A few clicks are all you need to alter your deployment.
Benefits of Mulesoft API Manager
Some of the benefits of using Mulesoft API Manager include:
Reviews from Real Users
Mulesoft API Manager is a highly effective piece of software whose purpose is to enable users to design, build, manage, and publish APIs. It stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are the ease with which users can connect it to their applications and the high level of value that its support offers. It provides users with the ability to easily connect this solution with whatever program they need to join it with. Users can create connections without having to write code. It offers different types of support which ensure that users have a high level of understanding about the product and how to use it.
PeerSpot user Tolulope A., a technical lead specializing in integration and middleware at a financial services firm, notes the ease with which users can connect Mulesoft API Manager to their applications. He writes, “One good thing about MuleSoft is that they have a lot of connectors to those back-end applications. We don't really need to write code to be able to connect to a database or to connect with SAP. You just need credentials and the connectivity details. Most of the development of what we do is just drag and drop. They're able to connect with applications using standard connectors that are provided by ESB, by MuleSoft.”
The CEO & Co-Founder at a computer retailer notes the value of Mulesoft’s supporting documentation. They write, “The documentation is great; it is always up-to-date and well-presented. If any details are missing, then there is a blog available that contains a lot of details. There are also channels on YouTube to help you better understand the solution and what some of the processes look like.”
Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.
Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.
What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
