"It stores good reports, as in, improved reports if compared with the SoapUI. It also has in-built security. You just need to switch and check the security testing. My team has never used it, but I know ReadyAPI provides those facilities as well."
"The solution is a very user-friendly tool, especially when you compare it to a competitor like BlazeMeter."
"I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this."
"The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily."
"We have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting. The technology supports that and enables us to have a wider range of testing. Enterprise-level testing is something that we are satisfied with."
"This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market."
"This is an area for improvement with the tool. We unnecessarily use JMeter for some website testing, which we would like to avoid by introducing this tool for API and load testing because it provides load testing features."
"It's not that popular on the cloud."
"Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"Micro Focus needs to improve in terms of support. With the same support plan but when the product was owned by HP, support was more responsive and better coordinated."
"The TruClient protocol works well but it takes a lot of memory to run those tests, which is something that can be improved."
"The solution is a very expensive tool when compared with other tools."
"It would be good if we could look forward at the future technology needs we have. I would like to see Micro Focus provide more customer awareness around how LoadRunner can fulfill requirements with Big Data use cases, for example, where you do performance testing at the scale of data lakes... when it comes to technologies our company has yet to adopt, I would like to see an indication from Micro Focus of how one does performance testing and what kinds of challenges can we foresee. Those kinds of studies would really help us."
More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
LoadUI Pro is ranked 11th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review while Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 7 reviews. LoadUI Pro is rated 9.0, while Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of LoadUI Pro writes "Facilitates load testing, operational volume testing, and spike testing for the APIs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Full geographical coverage, integrates well with monitoring tools, granular project inspection capabilities". LoadUI Pro is most compared with Apache JMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, whereas Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Silk Performer, Apache JMeter and ReadyAPI.
See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
