"The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature."
"Qualys VM is very stable."
"Technical support is great and we've never really had a problem."
"The most recent is VMDR, which provides a comprehensive overview of how to detect, patch, and remediate specific vulnerabilities."
"I like Qualys because it is a very complete product, more so than Tenable."
"Great web application security for scanning."
"The initial setup was good. We didn't have any problems with it."
"Qualys VM's best feature is vulnerability management."
"The integrations for this solution are very good. I use a different product for virtual patching of vulnerabilities and Qualys integrates well with that product."
"An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite."
"Qualys VM's scanner doesn't pick up every vulnerability, so we have to use multiple scanners to cover that gap."
"Sometimes we face a problem with accessing the tool and not getting an expected result. From a technology point of view, they need to look into this."
"The reporting and the GUI need improvements."
"The ability to manage user accounts and give rights to the operator to know about abnormalities of applications is something that needs improvement."
"The price could be better. Asset view is still a legacy feature. I'm not able to extract the information about the asset with complete details. It would be better if they fixed that in the next release. I know Qualys is already working on it, so I'm hopeful it will be available in the next five or six months. That would be something that's changed where I seek improvement."
"Sometimes the scanning can get overwhelmed and start to drag when a lot of users are trying to scan at once."
"Endpoint stability and fault resolution could be improved."
"The reporting and dashboards could improve in Qualys VM. However, they have improved since the previous versions."
Kenna.VM is ranked 15th in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Qualys VM is ranked 3rd in Vulnerability Management with 24 reviews. Kenna.VM is rated 8.0, while Qualys VM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Kenna.VM writes "Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VM writes "Excellent continuous monitoring, helpful technical support, easy to scale, and simple to install". Kenna.VM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM, Snyk, Balbix BreachControl and RiskSense, whereas Qualys VM is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable SC, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Rapid7 InsightVM and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
