Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Stormshield Endpoint Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Kaspersky Endpoint Security...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
122
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (3rd), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (15th)
Stormshield Endpoint Security
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
63rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is 3.5%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stormshield Endpoint Security is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmed El Kayal - PeerSpot reviewer
User-friendly interface simplifies management while performance issues during scanning need addressing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is easy to implement and has a user-friendly interface. It stands out as an antivirus and malware protection solution due to its extensive feeds and resources for antivirus signatures. These capabilities enable effective malware protection. Additionally, it offers scalability as any endpoint added to Active Directory can be easily integrated by Kaspersky Security Center. Its straightforward deployment and ease of management are other valuable features. It does not require an advanced engineer to manage, and resources are readily available online, making it accessible and scalable.
it_user745593 - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects the global station and has good stability
The feature I find most valuable is that it protects the global station The solution's integration with the Windows environment could be better. The solution needs better integration with products, if it did, it would have the assumption of better security. I've been using the solution since…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This solution is stable."
"It has many features, like deploying a package to many clients, an MDM solution, etc."
"We have over 1,000 users using the solution in our organization and the solution has been able to handle it."
"This product is easy to use."
"The centralized management is a nice features. It gives us the leeway to deal with other things as protection is being carried on in the background. We do not have to keep on watching as long as we have the right updates. It also saves us time."
"The malware threat detection has been excellent overall."
"It's flexible, and Kaspersky Endpoint Security's performance is good. Also, the pricing is fine."
"The user interface is easy to maintain once it is setup."
"The feature I find most valuable is that it protects the global station."
 

Cons

"It would be ideal with the solution offered more documentation."
"It's grown more expensive and customers are not happy about it."
"The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business could improve the flexibility of use."
"It slows down the system sometimes, and it has the occasional false positive where it deems something a virus when it isn't."
"It would be good if Kaspersky could lower the solution's price so people could afford to buy the licenses."
"From time to time, some users loose connection via the Network Agent."
"The company needs to keep developing more security measures to help keep its customers safe. If they could keep adding to security features, it would be ideal."
"The solution's integration with the Windows environment could be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"It is quite standard, because we use the volume licensing."
"Licensing fees are paid annually."
"The licensing is affordable. We bought a three-year license. There are no additional costs in addition to the standard license fees."
"The cost of the solution is approximately $31,000 for three years."
"For licensing, we pay a yearly subscription."
"The tool is too expensive compared to other products."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
There is room for improvement in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business regarding Data Leakage Prevention (DLP). Additional features such as application control or device control could benefit fr...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business?
The pricing and licensing cost of Kaspersky Endpoint Security is cheaper compared to Trend Micro.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Kaspersky Work Space Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security
SkyRecon Systems StormShield Security Suite
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
Arkoon, Netasq
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Stormshield Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.