We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and NetSuite OneWorld based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."
"EnterpriseOne is stable and can be customized according to customer requirements."
"It is highly configurable. You have a choice in terms of how you want to run it. You can run it in your own data center, in a private cloud, or in a public cloud. The choice is really up to the customer."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"Lowers costs, produces higher efficiencies, while maintaining a leaner staff and produces advanced financials."
"Allows us to use it the way we need to instead of changing our needs and processes to fit the product."
"Inventory management in NetSuite OneWorld is one of the best in the industry, so this feature is what I like most about the solution."
"We've set up Jira integration and used robotic process automation (RPA) to streamline various processes, like procurement and invoicing. Some processes still require manual approval, like supplier invoices, but we're simplifying those too. We're also exploring integrating with other tools like Power BI for better data analytics and reporting. Currently, our automation focuses on general tasks, not document understanding or anything complex like that."
"NetSuite OneWorld is a single instance that allows you to do different business functions, such as reporting, order-to-cash, design-build, and procure-to-pay. This feature is what's most valuable in the solution."
"The executive dashboards have satisfied the founders and leadership with up to the minute information. This allows them to make high level decisions."
"Utilizes best practices that are simple to implement."
"Embedded business intelligence is a valuable feature. There is also no need to wait for extract functions, and each transaction is reflected in the system dashboards in real time."
"The reporting has to be flexible or it will turn the end-user off."
"I would like the user experience to be more user-friendly."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"Forms customization should be easier. Currently, it has to go through the development life cycle."
"It does not submit the inquiry as requested. We have to close the application and restart the computer."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"NetSuite OneWorld, the consolidation feature has been incredibly valuable. However, I cannot speak to the full range of features and functionalities offered by OneWorld as I am not familiar with all of them. I have utilized OneWorld primarily in the biotech industry, with a focus on operating expenses and financial reporting, such as capital contributions and foreign currency adjustments. I am confident, however, that OneWorld offers a robust module for reporting and consolidating revenue, though I have not had the opportunity to directly utilize this aspect of the software."
"In NetSuite OneWorld, what needs improvement is the production planning functionality."
"I don’t like the SaaS models. Of course, they make the tool powerful enough to run a billion-dollar business. The tool is cheaper than SAP or Core."
"The Project Management User Interface is lacking."
"There is not a 20 year pedigree of pharma experience in the NetSuite channel. While there are many of these CMO Pharma companies rapidly moving to NetSuite, there are few consultants with true pharma experience. Those who have experience are stretched pretty thin."
"Certain analytics features are missing that I've come to expect from other systems. Additionally, there are occasional issues with data accuracy that need to be addressed. Overall, deeper analytics capabilities would greatly improve the tool's usefulness for me."
"Some entities are not available for multiple subsidiaries, which requires duplication."
"If you were to use standard costs, it doesn't handle standard costs well."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 24 reviews while NetSuite OneWorld is ranked 15th in ERP with 7 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while NetSuite OneWorld is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Offers a variety of features, easy to use and understand, reasonably priced, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetSuite OneWorld writes "Useful currency exchange conversions, valuable report insight, and streamlined experience". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and SAP S/4HANA, whereas NetSuite OneWorld is most compared with NetSuite ERP, SAP Business One, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and SAP S/4HANA. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. NetSuite OneWorld report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.