We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and NetSuite ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Activity Based Costing Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution can scale."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are financial reporting, procurement, and project management."
"With the new versions, it has become very user-friendly. We have integration with mobiles, and we have cloud-based solutions. There are a lot of things that can be done by front-end users without technical knowledge. They can create reports without having to do any coding, and it's very good now."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has improved within all the solutions and there have been a lot of investments by Oracle in these solutions. Most of the functionalities, and business requirements, are available for the system in the solution and there have been enhancements to the processes, UI, and tools, which have been done on a regular basis."
"Its user interface and ease of navigation are valuable."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."
"The most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is the flashback it quickly takes you to the data browser. Additionally, one of the newer tools is the orchestrator which is very good."
"Every year, they release a new version."
"It's integrated into everything well so you can navigate and use it in a very simple way."
"It is a very solid product for finance and procure-to-pay processes."
"NetSuite is a better value than some competing solutions. The fee structure is simpler, and other ERP solutions don't offer as many options for configuration."
"We can install the bundles based on our needs."
"I have found there to be many features, such as manufacturing, accounting, financials, inventory, and purchasing."
"NetSuite ERP has dramatically improved our organization. We went from QuickBooks to NetSuite. You can compare this transition to changing from tennis shoes to a flying car."
"The most valuable aspect of NetSuite ERP is the multi-subsidiary portion, it is the strongest across all the other ERPs. If you want to do consolidations, it works a lot better than other tools."
"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."
"Needs better integration with IoT solutions."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"We’d like to see technical support integrated within the application so that it is not required to raise additional incidents or do manual outreach to support."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"The implementation procedure could be simplified."
"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."
"From the operation perspective, it could offer more functionality for the APIs."
"The product should improve its warehouse management solution."
"In terms of the main improvement to NetSuite is the talent itself. It's grown so fast and there are about 25,000 companies running on it, and it's a relatively newer system compared to other competitors. It's growing so fast that the talent base in the partner organization (there's about 200 of them), is pretty thin."
"In NetSuite ERP, they should focus on offering better customization options."
"There is a lot of room for improvement. Multiple manufacturing features need to be updated on NetSuite. More functionalities need to be added. I think there are a lot of functionalities coming out for warehouse management systems and manufacturing automation via advanced manufacturing functionalities. I think they need to improve a little more on those aspects and make it easier on the scheduling aspect."
"The communication has been peculiar, and the overall commercial process has been less than satisfactory."
"NetSuite ERP's UI could be improved. There are some features that are very complex that do not have to be. There are some aspects of the solution that could be simplified and this can include the documentation. Since it's a very complex tool, you expect to have great detailed documentation to help you implement it."
"Additionally, adding advanced modules such as AI components or customer service modules could help the system become more scalable."
"Improvement-wise, it should be more customizable. Currently, you can't enhance the product yourself in terms of development for any applications unless you've got a very strong and big development team. Those are the skills that are in very short supply."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 3rd in Activity Based Costing Software with 24 reviews while NetSuite ERP is ranked 4th in Activity Based Costing Software with 13 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while NetSuite ERP is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Offers a variety of features, easy to use and understand, reasonably priced, and has responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetSuite ERP writes "Has a user-friendly interface, good reporting, and it allows dashboard customization, but it lacks the functionality to maintain sub-ledgers, and its pricing could be better". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, whereas NetSuite ERP is most compared with Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, NetSuite OneWorld, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and SAP Business ByDesign. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. NetSuite ERP report.
See our list of best Activity Based Costing Software vendors.
We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.