Ivanti Secure Access vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks comparison

Ivanti and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category. Ivanti is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5. Ivanti holds a 1.6% mindshare in EIV, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Secure Access

Read 3 Ivanti Secure Access reviews

1,419 Views
1,405 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Prisma Access by Palo Alto ...

Read 65 Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks reviews

20,092 Views
4,018 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Ivanti Secure Access

Prisma Access by Palo Alto ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Ivanti Secure Access are both prominent security solutions. Users find Ivanti Secure Access to offer a richer feature set, while Prisma Access is praised for better pricing and support.

Features: Users highlight the comprehensive threat protection and scalability as valuable features of Prisma Access, along with competitive pricing and efficient support. Ivanti Secure Access is praised for its robust remote access capabilities, versatile integration with third-party tools, and rich feature set.

Room for Improvement: Prisma Access users suggest enhancements in reporting functionalities, admin flexibility, and scalability in large deployments. Ivanti Secure Access users indicate they would like to see improvements in speed optimization, simplified configuration processes, and third-party integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Users describe Prisma Access as straightforward to deploy but occasionally complex in large-scale deployments. Customer service is rated positively. Ivanti Secure Access receives mixed feedback on deployment ease, with some users experiencing challenges, but customer service is highly regarded. Deployment complexity varies, giving a slight advantage to Prisma Access due to smoother initial experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Prisma Access is noted for its competitive pricing and substantial ROI perceived through strong user protection. Ivanti Secure Access also delivers significant ROI, though users find its initial setup costs to be higher. Cost-effectiveness tilts in favor of Prisma Access, balancing price and value efficiently.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Secure Access vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Secure Access vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,668 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Secure Access

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Prisma Access by Palo Alto ...

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (4th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (1st), ZTNA as a Service (5th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Ivanti Secure Access is 1.6%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is 6.3%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks	6.3%
Ivanti Secure Access	1.6%
Other	92.1%

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

BabarShahbaz

Saleas Lead at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

A cloud solution to access the corporate network with BYOD policy

Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ. Ivanti Secure Access offers granular control over network access, allowing for on-demand VPN connections when accessing corporate resources. This means users may not need to initiate a VPN connection manually but can access resources seamlessly when accessing corporate websites or applications. This granular feature helps enhance security and user experience by providing secure access only when needed.

Read full review

IgorPinter

Director at PULSEC

Zero-trust access has improved remote security and now simplifies cloud-based firewall management

Regarding the integration part for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, the integration with identity providers is pretty much good. It is basically firewall as a service, so it performs well. I completed the integration without any issues. What Palo Alto Networks can do better for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is probably to have the point of presence available in more locations. The point of presence from the Serbia region has the nearest POP in Frankfurt, which is an issue since it is your gateway—when you start browsing the internet, you go through a commercial connection in Germany. They definitely need to spread the service in other countries.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The scalability of Pulse Client is good."

"It also provides an auto-connect feature. When you turn on your laptop and put it on auto-connect, it automatically connects."

"Pulse Client is a very good solution; it is very easy to manage, and very stable."

"The most valuable feature of Pulse Client is integration with Google authenticator for two-factor authentication."

"Prisma Access gives us security from a single point. It controls mobile users and determines how secure their networks will be, including from where they will get internet access. We can optimize things and add security profiles centrally."

"The most valuable features of the solution stem from the fact that it offers stability and scalability while being a very secure product."

"It's much faster and more secure than legacy solutions. It is also quite stable and scalable as well. We are able to see all the traffic in one place."

"From an audit or security perspective, the solution has been very stable so far."

"Monitoring is the most valuable feature because we can easily monitor all kinds of stuff coming over the network. We can check the dashboard and work accordingly."

"Overall, the cost savings, ease of deployment, and better VPN user experience and performance are valuable."

"The overall rating for GlobalProtect is nine out of ten."

"But if you have a budget for enterprise or best of firewalls I think you should take this solution into consideration."

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks pros

Cons

"Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ."

"Pulse Client could improve the system tokens for authentication."

"Pulse Client could improve the reports. The reports are not in PDF and we can't check the details in the reports of users who are using the VPNs."

"The price can be reduced to make it more competitive."

"The tools' scalability is subject to some limitations when done on-premise due to the need for additional licenses. However, in other scenarios, increasing scalability involves expanding infrastructure to accommodate more third-party VPN access. It is scalable as long as you pay the money. Also, it needs to improve security."

"We are using the SaaS offering. We use our applications for microservices. We use Twistlock to scan containers, and it displays these results in Prisma, which is a good feature because we can see vulnerabilities with respect to these containers. We can see everything in a very detailed manner. However, when you have different environments for a single application, such as DEV, QA, PROD, and TEST, all these environments run multiple containers, which can lead to a very high number of containers. In such a scenario, it shows you the alerts for all those containers that have vulnerabilities. If you show the results of all the containers that share the same image, it is not going to add any value. Therefore, they should narrow down the alerts based on a container. It should show information for a single container. Otherwise, the person who is looking at the results gets the impression that he has to fix all these issues. This is something that they can improve."

"The one thing that I've been a little bit disappointed with is when we have had to open cases with Palo Alto about Prisma Access issues. Versus their other platforms, like their firewalls, where we tend to get really quick responses and very definitive answers, the few tickets I've had to open for Prisma Access have taken them longer to respond to. And they haven't necessarily given me the kind of answer I was looking for, meaning a fix to the problem."

"Palo Alto needs to improve the GlobalProtect agent to work as a secure web gateway agent, not only as a VPN agent because some companies would want only a secure gateway. They wouldn't want a full VPN. So, Palo Alto has to make the VPN agent work as a secure web gateway agent for those customers who want only the secure web gateway solution."

"Palo Alto Prisma 10 came out over a year ago. Palo Alto added this identity management feature. The legacy way Palo Alto selected which user is sitting on an IP address it passes through has been clunky."

"There can be some latency issues with the solution that should be improved."

"When it comes to the VPN, it uses the global protect VPN functionality to connect remotely, but it has a feature limitation for assigning multiple IP subnets to different user groups."

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pulse Client has two types of licenses. One is subsistence-based and the second is perpetual-based. The license cost is good, it is not very costly."

"As compared to other solutions, Prisma Access is much cheaper. It is probably 30% to 40% cheaper than other solutions, but I do not know the exact cost."

"The solution requires a license and the technical support has extra costs. The licensing model could improve."

"The initial prices of Prisma Access were okay. But as soon as you start deploying Palo Alto gear, the support prices and the recurring prices, which are the major operational costs, tend to increase over time."

"There's no reason not to buy the enterprise version that gives you unlimited PoPs, but you must understand the limitations you impose on yourself if you do that. If you go crazy, that allowlist will be too big for Kubernetes clusters."

"Prisma Access is a little bit expensive."

"In terms of pricing, considering that it is a two or three years old solution, they should apply big discounts for the next two or three years. This approach will be better for them to capture the market."

"The pricing for this solution is on the higher end."

"It is pretty expensive. We have to balance the cost of some features. They need to work on some of the services and products, price-wise."

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Pulse Client?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Pulse Client?

We use the solution to access the corporate network.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Pulse Client?

The tool is a preferred option for making the tunnel from these cloud VPNs. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks?

From my experience, Palo Alto is more expensive compared to solutions like Netskope and Triscale.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks?

See all answers

Comparisons

Ivanti Connect Secure vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 17% of the time

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 12% of the time

SonicWall SMA vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 10% of the time

Tailscale vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 10% of the time

AWS Direct Connect vs Ivanti Secure Access

Compared 6% of the time

More Ivanti Secure Access Competitors

Netskope vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 11% of the time

FortiSASE vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 7% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 7% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

May 2026

Download Ivanti Secure Access product report

Buyer's Guide

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks report

Download Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks product report

Also Known As

Pulse Client

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Prisma Access, GlobalProtect, Palo Alto GlobalProtect Mobile Security Manager, Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks, Prisma Access

Overview

Ivanti Secure Access delivers efficient, secure, and seamless connectivity solutions for enterprises needing robust security features and flexible access control to ensure optimal network safety.

Ivanti Secure Access caters to businesses requiring a secure infrastructure for remote access, providing consistent and safe connectivity for users across multiple devices and locations. It is designed to accommodate demanding business environments, ensuring security without compromising user experience.

What are the key features of Ivanti Secure Access?

Flexible VPN Support: Offers robust VPN support, ensuring secure remote access for users.
Access Control: Implements granular access control settings to manage and restrict user access efficiently.
Endpoint Security: Provides endpoint security measures, protecting devices from unauthorized access and threats.
Scalability: Designed to scale according to enterprise demands, allowing seamless integration as businesses grow.

What benefits can users expect from Ivanti Secure Access?

Enhanced Security: Strengthens network defense against potential threats.
Operational Efficiency: Promotes increased productivity by ensuring reliable access.
Reduced Costs: Lowers operational costs through efficient resource management.

Industries such as healthcare, finance, and education often implement Ivanti Secure Access to safeguard sensitive data and ensure uninterrupted service delivery. Its ability to provide comprehensive security solutions while managing user traffic efficiently makes it valuable in any security-conscious industry.

Ivanti

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks delivers robust security features including secure remote access across apps and traffic monitoring. It integrates smoothly with cloud environments to provide advanced threat protection and visibility into network traffic.

Prisma Access offers a comprehensive suite of security tools designed to protect cloud environments and remote workforces. With its focus on real-time risk identification and threat prevention, Prisma Access provides encrypted tunnels and centralized management for seamless connectivity and enhanced data security. Designed to scale across platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP, it optimizes traffic and connectivity while offering extensive visibility into vulnerabilities. However, integration with third-party products, usability, and support services are areas for development, as users report interface challenges and desire improved scalability and geographic coverage, especially in regions like China and South America.

What are the key features of Prisma Access?

Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects and manages potential threats instantly.
Secure Remote Access: Ensures secure connectivity to applications from anywhere.
Traffic Monitoring: Provides comprehensive oversight of network traffic.
Seamless Integration: Works well with platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP.
Firewall Capabilities: Blocks unauthorized access and threats.
Scalability: Adapts to various cloud environments to meet growing demands.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Prisma Access?

Reduced Data Breach Risk: Protects sensitive information through encrypted connections.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies management and configuration tasks.
Centralized Management: Offers a single view for managing all security policies.
Advanced Threat Protection: Regular updates guard against new threats.

Prisma Access is effectively used in industries requiring secure remote access and stringent data protection, such as finance and healthcare. Organizations leverage it to enforce Zero Trust policies, optimize network performance with SD-WAN, and ensure security compliance across multiple platforms.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Concord Hospital, State of Colorado, Essilor International, RheinLand Versicherungsgruppe, University of Westminster, Universidade Nove de Julho, SPAR Austria, CAME Group, ZipRealty, Greenhill & Co., IKT Agder, Aviva Stadium, Animal Logic, Management & Training Corporation, Brigham Young University Hawaii, School District of Chilliwack

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Secure Access vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

April 2026

Free Report: Ivanti Secure Access vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Secure Access vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,668 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Secure Access vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks report.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.