Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs Microsoft Configuration Manager comparison

Ivanti and Microsoft are both solutions in the Patch Management category. Ivanti is ranked #20 with an average rating of 9.0, while Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Ivanti holds a 1.1% mindshare in PM, compared to Microsoft’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Ivanti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Read 4 Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac reviews

363 Views
363 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Read 85 Microsoft Configuration Manager reviews

9,866 Views
3,157 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

Microsoft Configuration Manager and Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac compete in system environment management, with Ivanti taking the lead due to its comprehensive features and cross-platform compatibility, despite more favorable pricing and support for Microsoft.

Features: Microsoft Configuration Manager offers hardware and software inventory capabilities, application deployment, and operating system deployment. Ivanti delivers robust patch management for multiple OS platforms, automates vulnerability assessments, and compliance scanning. Ivanti's cross-platform patch management is a key differentiator.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment for Microsoft Configuration Manager is straightforward within Windows environments, benefiting from extensive integration with other Microsoft services. Ivanti's deployment process is versatile, addressing mixed OS environments effectively, and ensures rapid resolution of issues. Microsoft provides a more robust infrastructure for support.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Configuration Manager involves a lower initial cost and ongoing licensing fees, making it more affordable upfront. Ivanti's pricing reflects its broad capabilities, leading to higher initial costs but faster ROI through enhanced security compliance and system uptime. Microsoft's solution is cost-effective, while Ivanti provides significant return through streamlined patch management efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNI...

Ranking in Patch Management

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Ranking in Patch Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Distribution (1st), Server Monitoring (7th), Configuration Management (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 8.6%, down from 15.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Configuration Manager	8.6%
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac	1.1%
Other	90.3%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

KarthikU

Linux admin at Ameex Technologies

With good website development capabilities, the solution also provides exceptional stability

The initial setup is straightforward. The time taken for deployment for the website depends on the website code files and database. It may take four hours to eight hours for a single site to migrate from another solution. We used to do the migration from the cloud only and not on-premises. For deployment, we used to compress the code files, and using SFTP, we used to transfer the files. We then configure the same with that, and after transferring the code files, we used to have the UAT, staging, and production URL. Once everything is fine, we will switch the DNS for the live website. For the deployment and maintenance, we need support from the client's side and from the management side to make the DNS switch. We also need help from third-party vendors to provide access.

Read full review

JunedBedrekar

Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Have effectively deployed patches and applications while integrating with cloud solutions

The features I find most valuable in Microsoft Configuration Manager are replication and scripting. If I want to get a fetch report for anything, such as hardware-related issues or group policy-related issues, I need to fetch the report by using SCCM's scripting language and remediation part. The inventory collection features of Microsoft Configuration Manager are good because we always prefer the inventory. We do it by using the script language. We use remote management capabilities in Microsoft Configuration Manager. Remote management capabilities are useful if the user is not providing access; we can use the backend users to update the group policy and sync the devices. These are the main features we require.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The website development section is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"The solution is easy to implement."

"The tool is a stable product."

"Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date."

"I like Mircosoft's technical support. Microsoft has a few updates, like some of the critical KBs. They are published within the interval time, and in case of an escalation on the client missions, we will raise a ticket with the Microsoft team. They will create a hotfix or a critical update. They will chat with us, and that is one thing I like about Microsoft. Whenever any issues occur at my organization, they will help you out soon as possible within the SLA."

"Offers good patching."

"This has made the management of our environment easier."

"The most valuable features are Remote Connect, SUP, Cloud functionality, Report, Query, and third-party patching."

"Microsoft has done a good job with authentication solutions, such as single sign-on, or open authentication."

"This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD."

"Automation of operating system, application, and update deployments massively reduces IT operations effort."

"It's helped us solve problems surrounding patching, installing, and reporting different patches, etc., on the virtual machines."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pros

Cons

"The better way to improve the solution is by working on an area where it lacks, which includes the migration part."

"The tool needs to improve its visual system."

"The solution can be quite expensive, compared to other options on the market."

"Marketing: Our management doesn't understand that there is a piece of software which helps them automate and manage the entire network, as far as operating systems on computers."

"It would be nice to have everything in one place. Now they have Intune for the desktops and SCCM to handle their servers."

"The time the solution takes for updating systems could be quicker. For example, the system information status is not updating as it should. Additionally, the database synchronization querying is slow and could be improved."

"The solution could improve the functionality for automating, license management. Additionally, more and better-looking reports are needed."

"The database should be made to be more stable and robust, but not so much the configuration."

"As far as load balancing across, they don't have that support yet, so that you can actually build multiple primaries and have it load balance across. They don't have any of that functionality yet. That would be a nice feature, to scale that way."

"The solution should incorporate AI. It should also incorporate real-time capabilities. If we could get real-time information about challenges or issues, it would allow us to take immediate action. For example, with the recent outage caused by the Windows issue, having a real-time warning system could have helped us avoid or reduce the downtime we experienced."

"In terms of the monitoring, the timeframe it takes to actually report back on the compliance of a device after it has been patched is a bit too long."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source, so we do not need any licensing."

"It comes free with the Microsoft account. We have a yearly agreement, and all products are covered under it."

"The price is competitive and reasonable."

"Pricing and licensing are horrible. You have to not look at dollar value to use SCCM. It's super-duper expensive but it works. The acquisition cost is expensive, it's labor-intensive. But it works."

"I rate the price of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager an eight out of ten."

"We use the tool's free license. It is expensive."

"The license price could be reduced for Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager They should make the price more affordable for smaller companies, most companies would be able to use the solution if it was priced better. There are more people on this cloud because you don't have to have either a server room or an on-premise server. You can have one IT person handle this without any local infrastructure."

"There is not a license needed to use the solution."

"When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."

More Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	64

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac?

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac?

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, and Mac helps to ensure that everything is up to date.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac?

I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

See all answers

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

See all answers

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

See all answers

What do you like most about SCCM?

One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...

See all answers

Comparisons

KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 44% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 31% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac

Compared 24% of the time

More Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 9% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 5% of the time

BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 4% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Patch Management

January 2026

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac report

Download Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Configuration Manager

December 2025

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager product report

Also Known As

HEAT Patch, PatchLink

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ), Microsoft SMS

Overview

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac, powered by Heat, swiftly detects vulnerabilities in today’s environment, from workstation to data center. And it deploys expertly pretested patches automatically, helping organizations to patch with more efficiency and efficacy.

Ivanti

Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT management with features such as software deployment, patch management, and automation, centralizing operations for Windows environments. Integration with Microsoft products allows efficient oversight of workstations and servers.

Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive IT management, offering software deployment, patch management, and application pushing. Automation reduces manual tasks, ensuring consistency across systems. Centralized management enables standardized OS deployments, application updates, and configuration integrity. Integration with Microsoft products facilitates seamless operations, while hardware and software inventory, compliance reporting, and remote control functions enhance IT management. Users seek improvements in application deployment for those without deep scripting knowledge and desire better WSUS control, PowerShell and Intune integration, Linux compatibility, and user interface enhancements. Performance improvements are requested for remote user management and third-party application support.

What features enhance Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Software Deployment: Efficiently distribute software across large networks.
Patch Management: Automate and streamline update processes for security and functionality.
Automation Capabilities: Reduce manual effort and enhance consistency in IT tasks.
Centralized Management: Standardize OS deployments and application updates.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Seamless operation with existing Microsoft infrastructure.
Hardware and Software Inventory: Comprehensive tracking for assets and resources.
Compliance Reporting: Ensure compliance with internal and external standards.
Remote Control Functions: Enhance support and troubleshooting capabilities.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Decreased Manual Work: Automation reduces time spent on repetitive tasks.
Enhanced Security: Automated patch management keeps systems secure.
Consistent Configurations: Centralized updates ensure uniformity across systems.
Improved Integration: Seamless operation within Microsoft ecosystems boosts productivity.
Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed inventory and reporting tools aid in strategic planning.
Streamlined Support: Remote capabilities improve IT support and user satisfaction.

Microsoft Configuration Manager is widely implemented in organizations to manage Windows workstations and servers. It is essential for deploying operating systems and applications, managing software updates, and conducting hardware and software inventories. The tool is crucial for endpoint and configuration management, ensuring compliance, and automating processes like patching and vulnerability management. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education rely on Microsoft Configuration Manager to keep systems secure and operational, adapting it to address their specific needs and challenges in maintaining diversified IT environments.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad

Buyer's Guide

Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

December 2025

Free Report: Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager report.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.